Suppr超能文献

亚胺培南-西司他丁与庆大霉素加克林霉素治疗混合感染的随机试验

Randomized trial of imipenem-cilastatin versus gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of polymicrobial infections.

作者信息

Danziger L H, Creger R J, Shwed J A, Stellato T A, Hau T

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago 60612.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 1988;8(6):315-8. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1988.tb04089.x.

Abstract

The comparative efficacy of imipenem-cilastatin versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of polymicrobial infections was evaluated. Eleven patients completed treatment with the former and nine with the latter. Conditions treated included infected extremity ulcers, peritonitis, perirectal abscess, soft-tissue abscess, abdominal abscess, and acute diverticulitis. Similar rates of bacteriologic and clinical cure or improvement were achieved with the two treatments. Superinfection occurred in two patients who received imipenem-cilastatin and one who received clindamycin and gentamicin. No significant difference in adverse effects was noted. Imipenem-cilastatin appears to be an effective antibiotic in treating polymicrobial infections; however, a much larger patient population would be required to detect a significant difference in the efficacy rates or frequency of adverse effects when comparing the two regimens.

摘要

对亚胺培南-西司他丁与克林霉素及庆大霉素治疗混合感染的疗效进行了评估。11例患者接受前者治疗并完成疗程,9例患者接受后者治疗。所治疗的病症包括感染的肢体溃疡、腹膜炎、直肠周围脓肿、软组织脓肿、腹部脓肿和急性憩室炎。两种治疗方法在细菌学治愈率和临床治愈率或改善率方面相似。接受亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗的2例患者及接受克林霉素和庆大霉素治疗的1例患者发生了二重感染。未观察到不良反应有显著差异。亚胺培南-西司他丁似乎是治疗混合感染的一种有效抗生素;然而,在比较两种治疗方案时,需要更大规模的患者群体才能检测到疗效率或不良反应发生率的显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验