Maastro Clinic, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Department of Radiation Oncology, HagaZiekenhuis, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jun;21(6):63-72. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12866. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
To evaluate the accuracy of a commercial optical surface tracking (OST) system and to demonstrate how it can be implemented to monitor patient positioning during non-coplanar single isocenter stereotactic treatments of brain metastases. A 3-camera OST system was used (Catalyst HD™, C-RAD) on a TruebeamSTx with a 6DoF couch. The setup accuracy and agreement between the OST system, and CBCT and kV-MV imaging at couch angles 0° and 270°, respectively, were examined. Film measurements at 3 depths in the Rando-Alderson phantom were performed using a single isocenter non-coplanar VMAT plan containing 4 brain lesions. Setup of the phantom was performed with CBCT at couch 0° and subsequently monitored by OST at other couch angles. Setup data for 7 volunteers were collected to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the OST system at couch angles 0°, 45°, 90°, 315°, and 270°. These results were also correlated to the couch rotation offsets obtained by a Winston-Lutz (WL) test. The Rando-Alderson phantom, as well as volunteers, were fixated using open face masks (Orfit). For repeated tests with the Rando-Alderson phantom, deviations between rotational and translational isocenter corrections for CBCT and OST systems are always within 0.2° (pitch, roll, yaw), and 0.1mm and 0.5mm (longitudinal, lateral, vertical) for couch positions 0° and 270°, respectively. Dose deviations between the film and TPS doses in the center of the 4 lesions were -1.2%, -0.1%, -0.0%, and -1.9%. Local gamma evaluation criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/1 mm yielded pass rates of 99.2%, 99.2%, 98.6%, 89.9% and 98.8%, 97.5%, 81.7%, 78.1% for the 4 lesions. Regarding the volunteers, the mean translational and rotational isocenter shift values were (0.24 ± 0.09) mm and (0.15 ± 0.07) degrees. Largest isocenter shifts were found for couch angles 45˚ and 90˚, confirmed by WL couch rotation offsets. Patient monitoring during non-coplanar VMAT treatments of brain metastases is feasible with submillimeter accuracy.
评估一种商业光学表面跟踪(OST)系统的准确性,并展示如何将其用于监测脑转移非共面单等中心立体定向治疗过程中的患者定位。在具有 6 自由度(6DoF)治疗床的 TruebeamSTx 上使用了一个 3 相机 OST 系统(Catalyst HD™,C-RAD)。分别在治疗床角度为 0°和 270°时,检查了 OST 系统与锥形束 CT(CBCT)和千伏毫安(kV-MV)成像之间的设置准确性和一致性。在 Rando-Alderson 体模的 3 个深度处进行了单次等中心非共面容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)计划的胶片测量,该计划包含 4 个脑病变。使用 CBCT 在治疗床 0°处对体模进行设置,然后在其他治疗床角度使用 OST 进行监测。为了评估 OST 系统在治疗床角度 0°、45°、90°、315°和 270°的准确性和可重复性,收集了 7 名志愿者的设置数据。这些结果还与 Winston-Lutz(WL)测试获得的治疗床旋转偏移相关联。使用开放式面罩(Orfit)固定 Rando-Alderson 体模和志愿者。对于 Rando-Alderson 体模的重复测试,CBCT 和 OST 系统的旋转和平移等中心校正之间的偏差始终在 0.2°(俯仰、滚动、偏航)以内,并且在治疗床角度 0°和 270°时,偏差分别为 0.1mm 和 0.5mm(纵向、横向、垂直)。4 个病变中心的胶片和治疗计划系统(TPS)剂量之间的剂量偏差为-1.2%、-0.1%、-0.0%和-1.9%。使用 2%/2mm 和 3%/1mm 的局部伽马评估标准,4 个病变的通过率分别为 99.2%、99.2%、98.6%、89.9%和 98.8%、97.5%、81.7%、78.1%。对于志愿者,平均平移和旋转等中心移位值分别为(0.24±0.09)mm 和(0.15±0.07)度。最大的等中心移位发生在治疗床角度为 45°和 90°时,这与 WL 治疗床旋转偏移得到的结果一致。脑转移非共面 VMAT 治疗过程中患者的监测是可行的,精度可达亚毫米级。