Suppr超能文献

是否要发推?看看放射学会如何使用 Twitter。

To Tweet or Not to Tweet? A Look at Radiology Societies' Use of Twitter.

机构信息

Imaging Department, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Praed St, Paddington, London, W2 1NY, UK.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jul;43(7):1070-1074. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02437-1. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Twitter is the most used social media platform by medical professionals and has become an effective way to disseminate ideas and information.

AIM

To evaluate Twitter usage by some of the larger diagnostic radiology (DR) and interventional radiology (IR) societies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from the publicly available Twitter analytics platform, Twitonomy™. Data collected included the number of followers, Twitter output, user engagement and changes of these parameters between January 2017 and January 2019.

RESULTS

DR societies have the largest number of followers. The IR group increased its number of followers by 5139 (55%) compared with 10013 (18%) by the DR group during the period studied. In both years, the IR group posted more tweets/day compared with the DR group (6.6 vs. 4.7). Although user engagement increased for both IR and DR societies, the IR subgroup had a highly engaged user audience with a similar number of 'likes' to the DR group despite their larger Twitter following (DR 65500 vs. IR 14411 in 2019).

CONCLUSIONS

The IR societies studied experienced comparable Twitter engagement to the larger DR societies. The societies with the smallest number of followers (BSIR and CIRSE) enjoyed the largest relative increase in followers over the study period. IR societies should be encouraged by these results to continue to publicize their work on social media and increase awareness of the specialty.

摘要

简介

Twitter 是医学专业人士使用最多的社交媒体平台,已成为传播思想和信息的有效途径。

目的

评估一些较大的放射诊断学 (DR) 和介入放射学 (IR) 学会在 Twitter 上的使用情况。

材料与方法

数据来自于公开的 Twitter 分析平台 Twitonomy™。收集的数据包括关注者数量、Twitter 输出、用户参与度以及 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月期间这些参数的变化。

结果

DR 学会拥有最多的关注者。与 DR 组的 10013 名(18%)相比,IR 组在研究期间增加了 5139 名(55%)关注者。在这两年中,IR 组每天发布的推文数量多于 DR 组(6.6 条 vs. 4.7 条)。尽管 IR 和 DR 学会的用户参与度都有所增加,但与拥有更大 Twitter 关注量的 DR 组相比,IR 亚组拥有高度参与的用户群体,点赞数量相似(DR 为 65500 个,IR 为 14411 个,均为 2019 年的数据)。

结论

所研究的 IR 学会在 Twitter 上的参与度与更大的 DR 学会相当。关注者数量最少的学会(BSIR 和 CIRSE)在研究期间的关注者数量增长幅度最大。这些结果应鼓励 IR 学会继续在社交媒体上宣传他们的工作,并提高人们对该专业的认识。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验