Suppr超能文献

对一级大学运动员营养知识的评估。

Assessment of nutrition knowledge in division I college athletes.

作者信息

Werner Emily N, Guadagni Alyssa J, Pivarnik James M

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Health. 2022 Jan;70(1):248-255. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1740234. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assess nutrition knowledge of Division I college athletes.

PARTICIPANTS

128 student-athletes (n = 70 female) from eight sports completed the survey in June 2018. METHODS: The survey by Calella et al (2017) was used to assess both general and sport nutrition knowledge.

RESULTS

Cases with more than 20% of responses missing were excluded (n = 3). Overall average score was 57.6% ± 18.6%. Females scored significantly ( < 0.001) better than the males (66.5% ± 16.4% versus 46.2% ± 14.7%). Participants were divided into revenue (football, ice hockey, male's basketball, women's basketball; n = 63) and non-revenue sports (field hockey, golf, rowing, soccer; n = 62) to address differences in knowledge between sports with greater versus lesser nutrition resource access. Revenue sports scored significantly ( < 0.001) worse than non-revenue sports (45.7% ± 15.2% versus 69.7% ± 13.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Athletes appear to have low nutrition knowledge, putting them at risk for inappropriate dietary choices that could decrease ability to optimally perform and increase risk of injury.

摘要

目的

评估一级大学运动员的营养知识。

参与者

来自八个运动项目的128名学生运动员(n = 70名女性)于2018年6月完成了调查。方法:采用卡莱拉等人(2017年)的调查来评估一般营养知识和运动营养知识。

结果

排除了回答缺失超过20%的案例(n = 3)。总体平均得分是57.6%±18.6%。女性得分显著高于男性(P < 0.001)(66.5%±16.4%对46.2%±14.7%)。参与者被分为创收项目(橄榄球、冰球、男子篮球、女子篮球;n = 63)和非创收项目(曲棍球、高尔夫、赛艇、足球;n = 62),以探讨营养资源获取较多与较少的运动项目在知识方面的差异。创收项目得分显著低于非创收项目(P < 0.001)(45.7%±15.2%对69.7%±13.1%)。

结论

运动员的营养知识似乎较低,这使他们面临做出不当饮食选择的风险,可能会降低最佳表现能力并增加受伤风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验