Suppr超能文献

患者对老视及其矫正的态度和信念。

Patients' attitudes and beliefs to presbyopia and its correction.

机构信息

Centre for Applied Vision Research, City, University of London, London, UK.

Centre for Applied Vision Research, City, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Optom. 2021 Apr-Jun;14(2):127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Mar 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Presbyopia is the gradual inability to focus near objects with age. This study explores patients' attitudes and beliefs towards presbyopia including preferred modes of near refractive correction.

METHODS

In the United Kingdom, twenty-four volunteers completed an online questionnaire and attended a structured, recorded focus group. Participants' age ranged between 36 and 48 years, representing a pre-presbyopic and a presbyopic population. Attitudes and beliefs about presbyopia, its significance, and opinions about current refractive correction including multifocal contact lenses were transcribed and coded using content analysis for overarching themes and patterns.

RESULTS

Six participants (25%) were already wearing a near visual correction while 18 (75%) were not. Five key primary themes with clear inter-participant similarities were identified as 'age-related' (75%), 'acceptance' (50%), clear lack of 'familiarity with the word presbyopia' (65%), a mixed/ reluctant attitude 'towards (multifocal) contact lenses' (62.5%), and 'comfort and convenience' of a presbyopic correction (79%) whereby cost is of less importance.

CONCLUSION

The need for a reading correction was perceived as a sign of age. Spectacles were the most preferred mode of near vision correction, while comfort and convenience were seen as more important than cost. Patient education about presbyopia is lacking. Multifocal contact lenses are not necessarily the preferred visual correction even if the patient already wears contact lenses for distance.

摘要

目的

远视是随着年龄的增长逐渐无法聚焦于近物的一种现象。本研究旨在探讨患者对远视的态度和信念,包括对近视力矫正方式的偏好。

方法

在英国,24 名志愿者完成了在线问卷调查,并参加了一个结构化的记录焦点小组。参与者的年龄在 36 岁至 48 岁之间,代表了一个未出现远视和一个出现远视的人群。参与者对远视及其重要性的态度和信念,以及对当前包括多焦点隐形眼镜在内的近视力矫正方式的看法,被转录并进行内容分析,以确定主题和模式。

结果

6 名参与者(25%)已经佩戴了近视力矫正眼镜,而 18 名参与者(75%)没有。有 5 个主要的初级主题,参与者之间存在明显的相似性,分别是“与年龄相关”(75%)、“接受”(50%)、“对远视这个词缺乏熟悉度”(65%)、“对(多焦点)隐形眼镜的混合/不情愿态度”(62.5%)以及“近视力矫正的舒适性和便利性”(79%),而成本的重要性相对较低。

结论

对阅读矫正的需求被视为衰老的标志。眼镜是近视力矫正的首选方式,而舒适性和便利性比成本更为重要。患者对远视的认识不足。即使患者已经佩戴隐形眼镜矫正远视,多焦点隐形眼镜也不一定是首选的视觉矫正方式。

相似文献

1
Patients' attitudes and beliefs to presbyopia and its correction.患者对老视及其矫正的态度和信念。
J Optom. 2021 Apr-Jun;14(2):127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
3
Gaze and behavioural metrics in the refractive correction of presbyopia.注视和行为指标在老视屈光矫正中的应用。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Jun;44(4):774-786. doi: 10.1111/opo.13310. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
4
Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses.老视矫正的进展 I:眼镜和隐形眼镜。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Jan;34(1):8-29. doi: 10.1111/opo.12091. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
8
Presbyopia: Effectiveness of correction strategies.老花眼:矫正策略的有效性。
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019 Jan;68:124-143. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

5
New insights in presbyopia: impact of correction strategies.老视新认识:矫正策略的影响。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001122.
8
Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.老花眼——当前治疗选择与新兴疗法综述
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 May 24;15:2167-2178. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S259011. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

2
Presbyopia: Effectiveness of correction strategies.老花眼:矫正策略的有效性。
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019 Jan;68:124-143. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
4
Pharmacological treatments of presbyopia: a review of modern perspectives.老花眼的药物治疗:现代观点综述
Eye Vis (Lond). 2017 Feb 7;4:3. doi: 10.1186/s40662-017-0068-8. eCollection 2017.
5
Factors in the success of new contact lens wearers.新佩戴隐形眼镜者成功佩戴的因素。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Feb;40(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
8
Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses.老视矫正的进展 I:眼镜和隐形眼镜。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Jan;34(1):8-29. doi: 10.1111/opo.12091. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
10
Meta-analysis of sex differences in presbyopia.Meta 分析年龄相关性远视的性别差异。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 May 31;53(6):3215-20. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9791.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验