Labiris Georgios, Panagiotopoulou Eirini-Kanella, Ntonti Panagiota
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, GRC.
Cureus. 2022 Apr 28;14(4):e24548. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24548. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Introduction The primary objective of this study is to develop and validate an experimental lighting facility that allows the evaluation of near and intermediate vision in different user-defined illuminance levels. Methods This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Normophakic patients populated three validation groups (VGs) according to their binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA): a) VG1, 0.0-0.1 logMAR; b) VG2, 0.4 logMAR; and c) VG3, 0.7 logMAR. All participants addressed 10 near and intermediate activities of daily life (ADLs) in the three following lighting settings: 1) 25 foot candles (fc)/3000 kelvins (K), 2) 50 fc/4000 K, and 3) 75 fc/6000 K. Results Thirty patients in each group performed all ADLs in the three lighting settings. VG1 demonstrated the best ADL scores in all ADLs and lighting settings, followed by the VG2. VG3 presented the worst scores. ADLs using printed material showed significant differences among the three lighting settings for all study groups, while ADLs using screens or needing manual dexterity demonstrated no significant differences except for the Screwdriver Test (ST) in VG1. All ADL scores demonstrated a high correlation with UNVA in all lighting settings (p < 0.001). Conclusion This is the first study that validates a lighting facility for comparative studies in patients with different near vision capacities performing a series of ADLs.
引言 本研究的主要目的是开发并验证一种实验性照明设施,该设施能够在不同的用户定义照度水平下评估近视力和中视力。方法 这是一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。正视眼患者根据其双眼未矫正近视力(UNVA)分为三个验证组(VG):a)VG1,0.0 - 0.1 logMAR;b)VG2,0.4 logMAR;c)VG3,0.7 logMAR。所有参与者在以下三种照明环境中进行10项近视力和中视力日常生活活动(ADL):1)25英尺烛光(fc)/3000开尔文(K),2)50 fc/4000 K,3)75 fc/6000 K。结果 每组30名患者在三种照明环境下完成了所有ADL。VG1在所有ADL和照明环境中表现出最佳的ADL评分,其次是VG2。VG3的评分最差。所有研究组中,使用印刷材料的ADL在三种照明环境之间存在显著差异,而使用屏幕或需要手动灵活性的ADL除了VG1中的螺丝刀测试(ST)外无显著差异。在所有照明环境下,所有ADL评分与UNVA均呈现高度相关性(p < 0.001)。结论 这是第一项验证用于不同近视力能力患者进行一系列ADL比较研究的照明设施的研究。