Mullen H, Martin G L
Skills Unlimited, Winnepeg, Canada.
Int J Rehabil Res. 1988;11(2):125-41. doi: 10.1097/00004356-198806000-00004.
This study compared the effects of "typical" staff supervision to "typical" staff supervision plus one of two self-management strategies for improving work productivity of eight mentally retarded workers in a sheltered workshop. The first self-management strategy consisted of self monitoring plus one minute goal setting at the beginning of each half-day of work plus one minute of back-up social contigencies at the end of each half-day of work. The second self-management strategy was the same as that described above, plus a monetary bonus system for productivity. Procedural reliabilities were obtained on the components of the "typical" staff supervisory strategy and the self-management strategies. Both self-management strategies produced an increase in worker productivity, and there was little to recommend one over the other. Some limitations of existing research on self-management procedures for improving productivity of mentally retarded workers were discussed.
本研究比较了“典型”员工监督与“典型”员工监督加上两种自我管理策略之一对一家庇护工厂中八名智障工人工作效率的影响。第一种自我管理策略包括自我监控,在每个半天工作开始时设定一分钟的目标,以及在每个半天工作结束时进行一分钟的备用社会应急措施。第二种自我管理策略与上述相同,再加上一个基于工作效率的金钱奖励系统。对“典型”员工监督策略和自我管理策略的各个组成部分进行了程序可靠性分析。两种自我管理策略都提高了工人的工作效率,而且很难说哪一种更具优势。文中还讨论了现有关于提高智障工人工作效率的自我管理程序研究的一些局限性。