Suppr超能文献

脉冲电磁场治疗对骨关节炎患者疼痛、僵硬、身体功能和生活质量的影响:一项随机安慰剂对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy on Pain, Stiffness, Physical Function, and Quality of Life in Patients With Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2020 Jul 19;100(7):1118-1131. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa054.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy is a potentially useful treatment for osteoarthritis (OA), but its effectiveness is still controversial. This study aimed to examine the effects of PEMF therapy and PEMF parameters on symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients with OA.

METHODS

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro, clinical trial registers, and reference lists were searched until April 2019. This study examined randomized, placebo-controlled trials, patients with OA, symptom and/or QOL related outcomes, and articles published in English. Two authors extracted data and completed quality assessment.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included in our systematic review, while 15 studies with complete data were included in the meta-analysis. Our primary outcome was the standardized mean difference, which was equal to the treatment effect in the PEMF group minus the treatment effect in the placebo group divided by the pooled standard deviation. For pain, the standardized mean difference was 1.06 (95% CI = 0.61 to 1.51), for stiffness 0.37 (95% CI = 0.07 to 0.67), for function 0.46 (95% CI = 0.14 to 0.78), and for QOL 1.49 (95% CI = -0.06 to 3.04). PEMF parameters did not influence symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, there was a beneficial effect of PEMF therapy on pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with OA. Duration of treatment may not be a critical factor in pain management. Further studies are required to confirm the effects of PEMF therapy on QOL.

IMPACT

Our study suggests that PEMF therapy has clinically significant effects on pain in patients with OA. The current evidence was limited to the short-term effects of PEMF therapy.

摘要

目的

脉冲电磁场(PEMF)治疗可能是治疗骨关节炎(OA)的一种有效方法,但它的疗效仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨 PEMF 治疗和 PEMF 参数对 OA 患者症状和生活质量(QOL)的影响。

方法

我们检索了 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE、PEDro、临床试验注册库和参考文献列表,检索截至 2019 年 4 月。本研究纳入了随机、安慰剂对照试验,患者为 OA 患者,结局指标为症状和/或 QOL 相关指标,文章语言为英语。两位作者提取数据并完成质量评估。

结果

我们的系统评价纳入了 16 项研究,而荟萃分析纳入了 15 项有完整数据的研究。我们的主要结局指标为标准化均数差,等于 PEMF 组的治疗效果减去安慰剂组的治疗效果,再除以合并的标准差。疼痛的标准化均数差为 1.06(95%CI=0.61 至 1.51),僵硬为 0.37(95%CI=0.07 至 0.67),功能为 0.46(95%CI=0.14 至 0.78),QOL 为 1.49(95%CI=-0.06 至 3.04)。PEMF 参数对症状没有影响。

结论

与安慰剂相比,PEMF 治疗对 OA 患者的疼痛、僵硬和身体功能有有益的影响。治疗持续时间可能不是疼痛管理的关键因素。需要进一步的研究来证实 PEMF 治疗对 QOL 的影响。

影响

本研究表明,PEMF 治疗对 OA 患者的疼痛具有显著的临床效果。目前的证据仅限于 PEMF 治疗的短期效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验