Pain and Rehabilitation Center, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 6;21(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03198-1.
Chronic pain is a globally widespread condition with complex clusters of symptoms within a heterogeneous patient group. Internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (IACT) has shown promising results in the treatment of chronic pain. How IACT is experienced by patients is less well known. Qualitative studies of patients' experiences are needed to further understand factors behind both engagement and negative effects. The aim of this study was to explore how IACT was experienced by chronic pain patients who had participated in a controlled trial.
Through an open and exploratory approach this study aimed to investigate how IACT was experienced when delivered as a guided self-help program to persons with chronic pain. Eleven participants were interviewed over telephone after completing IACT.
Qualitative analysis based on grounded theory resulted in 2 core categories and 8 subcategories. In treatment: Physical and cognitive restraints, Time and deadline, Therapist contact, and Self-confrontation. After treatment: Attitude to pain, Image of pain, Control or Command, and Acting with pain. Individual differences as well as specific conditions of the treatment may explain variations in how the treatment was approached, experienced and what consequences it led to. Therapist guidance and deadlines for homework play complex roles in relation to autonomy and change.
Adjusting treatment content and format based on participants' characteristics, such as expectations, motivation and restraints, might positively affect engagement, autonomy and change. Further research on attrition and negative effects of treatment might clarify what enables chronic pain patients to benefit from IACT.
clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01603797). Registered 22 May 2012. Retrospectively registered.
慢性疼痛是一种在全球范围内广泛存在的疾病,在异质的患者群体中具有复杂的症状群。互联网为基础的接受与承诺疗法(IACT)已在慢性疼痛治疗中显示出良好的效果。但是,患者对 IACT 的体验方式知之甚少。需要对患者的体验进行定性研究,以进一步了解参与和负面效果的背后因素。本研究旨在探讨接受过对照试验的慢性疼痛患者对 IACT 的体验。
通过开放和探索性的方法,本研究旨在探讨将 IACT 作为指导自助程序提供给慢性疼痛患者时的体验。在完成 IACT 后,通过电话对 11 名参与者进行了访谈。
基于扎根理论的定性分析得出了 2 个核心类别和 8 个亚类别。在治疗过程中:身体和认知限制、时间和截止日期、治疗师联系和自我对抗。治疗后:对疼痛的态度、疼痛的形象、控制或命令和带痛行动。个体差异以及治疗的具体情况可能会解释治疗方法、体验方式以及产生的后果的差异。治疗师的指导和家庭作业的截止日期在自主权和改变方面发挥着复杂的作用。
根据参与者的特征,如期望、动机和限制,调整治疗内容和格式可能会对参与度、自主权和改变产生积极影响。进一步研究治疗的脱落率和负面效果可能会阐明是什么使慢性疼痛患者受益于 IACT。
clinicaltrials.gov(NCT01603797)。2012 年 5 月 22 日注册。回顾性注册。