Suppr超能文献

阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍患者在模糊性或风险下的决策制定

Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment.

作者信息

Sun Tingting, Xie Teng, Wang Jing, Zhang Long, Tian Yanghua, Wang Kai, Yu Xin, Wang Huali

机构信息

Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing Dementia Key Lab, Beijing, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Key Laboratory for Mental Health, National Health Commission, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 18;11:218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00218. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Making advantageous decisions is essential in everyday life. Our objective was to assess how patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) make decisions under conditions of ambiguity or risk. In addition, the study also aimed to examine the relationship between decision-making competence and memory and executive function.

METHODS

Patients with MCI (n = 36) and AD (n = 29) and healthy elderly controls (HC, n = 34) were recruited from the memory clinic. All subjects were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery test. We used the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) to measure decision-making under ambiguity and the Game of Dice Task (GDT) to measure decision-making under risk. Pearson's correlation was used to examine the relationship between the performance of IGT and GDT with delayed recall and the Stroop test.

RESULTS

In the GDT, MCI and AD patients presented similar performance but showed different patterns when compared with the HC group. The proportion of those making advantageous choices was lower in the AD group than in the HC group ( = 0.01), while the MCI and HC groups did not differ ( = 0.14). Meanwhile, concerning the ratio of accepting negative feedback, the AD ( < 0.01) group was significantly different from the HC patients, but the MCI ( = 0.06) and HC groups did not differ. In the IGT, MCI and AD patients selected randomly from advantageous and disadvantageous decks ( = 0.94 and = 0.54), showing no significant change in performance over time. In contrast, the HC group made increasingly frequent advantageous selections over time ( = 0.04). Furthermore, the proportion of advantageous decision-makers for the GDT had a linear relationship with delayed recall of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test and Stroop color words ( < 0.01 and < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that decision-making ability under ambiguity is compromised in MCI and AD, and the decision-making under risk is only impaired in AD. Reduced decision-making performance under risk is closely correlated with lower executive functions and memory.

摘要

背景

做出有利决策在日常生活中至关重要。我们的目标是评估轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者和阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者在模糊或风险条件下如何做出决策。此外,该研究还旨在探讨决策能力与记忆和执行功能之间的关系。

方法

从记忆诊所招募了MCI患者(n = 36)、AD患者(n = 29)和健康老年对照(HC,n = 34)。所有受试者均接受了全面的神经心理成套测试。我们使用爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)来测量在模糊情况下的决策,使用掷骰子任务(GDT)来测量在风险情况下的决策。采用Pearson相关性分析来检验IGT和GDT的表现与延迟回忆及Stroop测试之间的关系。

结果

在GDT中,MCI和AD患者表现出相似的表现,但与HC组相比呈现出不同的模式。AD组中做出有利选择的比例低于HC组(= 0.01),而MCI组和HC组之间没有差异(= 0.14)。同时,关于接受负面反馈的比例,AD组(< 0.01)与HC患者有显著差异,但MCI组(= 0.06)和HC组之间没有差异。在IGT中,MCI和AD患者从有利和不利牌组中随机选择(= 0.94和= 0.54),随着时间推移表现没有显著变化。相比之下,HC组随着时间推移做出有利选择的频率越来越高(= 0.04)。此外,GDT中有利决策者的比例与霍普金斯言语学习测试的延迟回忆及Stroop颜色词之间存在线性关系(分别为< 0.01和< 0.01)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,MCI和AD患者在模糊情况下的决策能力受损,而在风险情况下的决策仅在AD中受损。风险情况下决策表现的降低与较低的执行功能和记忆密切相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b50f/7093589/d960a4466647/fpsyt-11-00218-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验