• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

母婴产后护理不一致:测量假象还是错失良机?

Discordance in postnatal care between mothers and newborns: Measurement artifact or missed opportunity?

机构信息

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Save the Children, Washington, D.C., USA.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010505. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010505.

DOI:10.7189/jogh.10.010505
PMID:32257159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7101084/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postnatal care (PNC) for mothers and newborns is essential to monitor risks of morbidity and adverse conditions following delivery. Current estimates of the coverage of PNC show substantial discordance between mothers and newborns. We investigate the sources of this discordance in Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS).

METHODS

We used DHS data from 48 countries collected since 2011, spanning phases 6 and 7 of the survey program with 32 and 16 surveys, respectively, analyzed. We assessed the distribution of the reported timing of PNC and conducted a sensitivity analysis that excludes/includes PNC reported within 0-1 hour or PNC in the day 2. Agreement in PNC reporting considered four groups: (1) Concordance, neither mother nor newborn received PNC; (2) Concordance, mother and newborn pair received PNC; (3) Discordance, mother received PNC and newborn did not; of (4) Discordance, mother did not receive PNC but the newborn did. We carried out logistic regressions to understand correlates of PNC discordance. All analyses distinguished phase 6 surveys from phase 7.

RESULTS

We found substantial differences in the PNC coverage estimated between phase 6 and phase 7 surveys. The phase 7 PNC questions for newborns were improved to increase the understanding of the questions by respondent which probably led to reducing the large PNC gap between mothers and newborns observed in phase 6 surveys. With phase 6 surveys, PNC coverage for mother was estimated on average at 62% compared to only 31% for newborns. No such gap was observed for phase 7 surveys, where for both mothers and newborns, the PNC coverage estimate was similar, at 56%. For both phases, over half of the reported PNC for mothers and newborns occurred during 0-1 hour following delivery, leading to substantial overestimation of PNC coverage, due to confusion between intrapartum care and PNC. There were 37% discordant cases between mother and newborn, largely in favor of the mother in phase 6 surveys, compared to 16% in phase 7 surveys. In phase 6 surveys, discordant PNC cases were observed largely among facility deliveries vs non-facility deliveries (44% compared to 19%).

CONCLUSIONS

Current estimates of coverage of PNC from DHS phase 6 surveys appears to include substantial level of measurement noises that could explain substantial part of the mother-newborn discordance in PNC. The PNC estimates appear to capture a substantial number of intrapartum care. Current measurement approaches warrant further validation to ensure accurate monitoring of the PNC programs.

摘要

背景

母婴产后护理(PNC)对于监测分娩后发病率和不良状况的风险至关重要。目前对 PNC 覆盖范围的估计显示,母亲和新生儿之间存在很大差异。我们在人口与健康调查(DHS)中研究了这种差异的来源。

方法

我们使用了自 2011 年以来收集的 48 个国家的 DHS 数据,涵盖了调查项目的第 6 阶段和第 7 阶段,分别分析了 32 项和 16 项调查。我们评估了报告的 PNC 时间分布,并进行了敏感性分析,排除/包括在 0-1 小时内报告的 PNC 或在第 2 天报告的 PNC。PNC 报告的一致性考虑了四个组:(1)一致,母亲和新生儿都没有接受 PNC;(2)一致,母亲和新生儿都接受了 PNC;(3)不一致,母亲接受了 PNC,但新生儿没有;(4)不一致,母亲没有接受 PNC,但新生儿接受了。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以了解 PNC 不一致的相关因素。所有分析都区分了第 6 阶段和第 7 阶段的调查。

结果

我们发现第 6 阶段和第 7 阶段的 PNC 覆盖率估计存在很大差异。第 7 阶段的新生儿 PNC 问题得到了改进,提高了受访者对问题的理解,这可能导致第 6 阶段调查中观察到的母亲和新生儿之间的 PNC 巨大差距缩小。在第 6 阶段调查中,母亲的 PNC 覆盖率平均估计为 62%,而新生儿仅为 31%。第 7 阶段调查没有观察到这种差距,母亲和新生儿的 PNC 覆盖率估计相似,为 56%。在两个阶段中,超过一半的母亲和新生儿报告的 PNC 发生在分娩后 0-1 小时内,由于将分娩期间的护理与 PNC 混淆,导致 PNC 覆盖率的大量高估。在母亲和新生儿之间有 37%的不一致病例,在第 6 阶段调查中,这种情况主要有利于母亲,而在第 7 阶段调查中,这种情况占 16%。在第 6 阶段调查中,不一致的 PNC 病例主要发生在设施分娩中,而非设施分娩中(44%比 19%)。

结论

目前来自 DHS 第 6 阶段调查的 PNC 覆盖率估计似乎包括了大量的测量噪声,这可以解释 PNC 中母亲-新生儿不一致的很大一部分原因。PNC 估计似乎捕捉到了大量的分娩期间的护理。目前的测量方法需要进一步验证,以确保对 PNC 计划进行准确监测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/8b5878540d3e/jogh-10-010505-F7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/e6565ed0cedb/jogh-10-010505-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/08ae10b5c183/jogh-10-010505-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/4b9e0e7634bb/jogh-10-010505-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/b703bdaec37e/jogh-10-010505-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/c3fbcf8d39ae/jogh-10-010505-F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/4259ce55b050/jogh-10-010505-F6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/8b5878540d3e/jogh-10-010505-F7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/e6565ed0cedb/jogh-10-010505-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/08ae10b5c183/jogh-10-010505-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/4b9e0e7634bb/jogh-10-010505-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/b703bdaec37e/jogh-10-010505-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/c3fbcf8d39ae/jogh-10-010505-F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/4259ce55b050/jogh-10-010505-F6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/506c/7101084/8b5878540d3e/jogh-10-010505-F7.jpg

相似文献

1
Discordance in postnatal care between mothers and newborns: Measurement artifact or missed opportunity?母婴产后护理不一致:测量假象还是错失良机?
J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010505. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010505.
2
Measuring postnatal care contacts for mothers and newborns: An analysis of data from the MICS and DHS surveys.衡量母亲和新生儿的产后护理接触情况:对多指标类集调查(MICS)和人口与健康调查(DHS)数据的分析
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020502. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020502.
3
Gap between contact and content in maternal and newborn care: An analysis of data from 20 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.孕产妇和新生儿护理中接触与内容之间的差距:对撒哈拉以南非洲20个国家数据的分析
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020501. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020501.
4
Factors associated with postnatal care for newborns in Zambia: analysis of the 2013-14 Zambia demographic and health survey.赞比亚与新生儿产后护理相关的因素:2013-2014 年赞比亚人口与健康调查分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 13;17(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1612-1.
5
High coverage but low quality of maternal and newborn health services in the coverage cascade: who is benefitted and left behind in accessing better quality health services in Nepal?在覆盖范围的传递过程中,孕产妇和新生儿健康服务的高覆盖率与低质量:在尼泊尔,谁受益于获得更高质量的卫生服务,而谁又被甩在后面?
Reprod Health. 2022 Jul 19;19(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01465-z.
6
Women's utilisation of quality antenatal care, intrapartum care and postnatal care services in Ethiopia: a population-based study using the demographic and health survey data.妇女在埃塞俄比亚利用优质产前护理、分娩期护理和产后护理服务的情况:基于人口的研究使用人口与健康调查数据。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 19;23(1):1174. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15938-8.
7
Comparison of inequality in utilization of postnatal care services between Bangladesh and Pakistan: Evidence from the Demographic and Health Survey 2017-2018.孟加拉国和巴基斯坦利用产后护理服务不平等的比较:来自 2017-2018 年人口与健康调查的证据。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jun 22;23(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05778-0.
8
Trend analysis of multi-level determinants of maternal and newborn postnatal care utilization in Pakistan from 2006 to 2018: Evidence from Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys.2006 年至 2018 年巴基斯坦母婴产后护理利用的多层次决定因素趋势分析:来自巴基斯坦人口与健康调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15286-7.
9
Early postnatal care contact within 24 hours by skilled providers and its determinants among home deliveries in Myanmar: Further analysis of the Myanmar Demographic and Health Survey 2015-16.由熟练提供者在 24 小时内提供的早期产后护理接触及其在家分娩中的决定因素:对 2015-16 年缅甸人口与健康调查的进一步分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 16;18(8):e0289869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289869. eCollection 2023.
10
What can we learn about postnatal care in Ghana if we ask the right questions? A qualitative study.如果我们提出正确的问题,我们能从加纳的产后护理中学到什么?一项定性研究。
Glob Health Action. 2015 Sep 7;8:28515. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.28515. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of gaps in the continuum of maternal and neonatal care in a high-mortality setting: An observational study in rural Guinea-Bissau.在高死亡率环境下确定孕产妇和新生儿连续护理中的差距:几内亚比绍农村地区的一项观察性研究
Trop Med Int Health. 2025 Aug;30(8):812-822. doi: 10.1111/tmi.14136. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Factors that influence the uptake of postnatal care from the perspective of fathers, partners and other family members: a qualitative evidence synthesis.从父亲、伴侣和其他家庭成员的角度来看影响产后护理利用的因素:定性证据综合评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 May;8(Suppl 2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011086.
3
Factors that influence uptake of routine postnatal care: Findings on women's perspectives from a qualitative evidence synthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Women's recall of maternal and newborn interventions received in the postnatal period: a validity study in Kenya and Swaziland.产妇对产后阶段接受的母婴干预措施的回忆:肯尼亚和斯威士兰的一项有效性研究。
J Glob Health. 2018 Jun;8(1):010605. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.010605.
2
Measuring postnatal care contacts for mothers and newborns: An analysis of data from the MICS and DHS surveys.衡量母亲和新生儿的产后护理接触情况:对多指标类集调查(MICS)和人口与健康调查(DHS)数据的分析
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020502. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020502.
3
Countdown to 2030: tracking progress towards universal coverage for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health.
影响常规产后护理接受度的因素:定性证据综合分析中关于女性观点的发现。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 12;17(8):e0270264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270264. eCollection 2022.
4
Household Survey Measurement of Newborn Postnatal Care: Coverage, Quality Gaps, and Internal Inconsistencies in Responses.家庭调查中新生儿产后护理的测量:覆盖范围、质量差距以及应答内部的不一致性。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Dec 21;9(4):737-751. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00209. Print 2021 Dec 31.
5
Spatial variability in factors influencing maternal health service use in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia: a geographically-weighted regression analysis.埃塞俄比亚吉马地区影响孕产妇保健服务利用因素的空间变异性:地理加权回归分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 12;21(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06379-3.
6
Immediate postnatal care following childbirth in Ugandan health facilities: an analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys between 2001 and 2016.乌干达医疗机构中产后即刻护理:对2001年至2016年人口与健康调查的分析
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004230.
7
The importance of improving intervention coverage measurement for ensuring all women, children and adolescents are reached with the health care services they need.改善干预覆盖率测量对于确保所有妇女、儿童和青少年都能获得所需医疗服务的重要性。
J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010102. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010102.
倒计时 2030:追踪实现生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康普遍覆盖的进展。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 14;391(10129):1538-1548. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30104-1. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Can surveys of women accurately track indicators of maternal and newborn care? A validity and reliability study in Kenya.对女性的调查能否准确追踪孕产妇和新生儿护理指标?肯尼亚的一项效度与信度研究。
J Glob Health. 2016 Dec;6(2):020502. doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.020502.
5
Measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in Mexico: validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care.衡量墨西哥孕产妇和新生儿保健进展:验证卫生系统接触和护理质量指标
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1047-0.
6
Assessing the validity of indicators of the quality of maternal and newborn health care in Kenya.评估肯尼亚孕产妇和新生儿保健质量指标的有效性。
J Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(1):010405. doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.010405.
7
What can we learn about postnatal care in Ghana if we ask the right questions? A qualitative study.如果我们提出正确的问题,我们能从加纳的产后护理中学到什么?一项定性研究。
Glob Health Action. 2015 Sep 7;8:28515. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.28515. eCollection 2015.
8
Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost?现有的干预措施能否终结可预防的孕产妇、新生儿和死产死亡,并需要付出什么代价?
Lancet. 2014 Jul 26;384(9940):347-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60792-3. Epub 2014 May 19.
9
Measuring coverage in MNCH: testing the validity of women's self-report of key maternal and newborn health interventions during the peripartum period in Mozambique.测量妇幼健康服务的覆盖面:在莫桑比克围产期期间,测试妇女自我报告的关键孕产妇和新生儿健康干预措施的有效性。
PLoS One. 2013 May 7;8(5):e60694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060694. Print 2013.
10
Measuring coverage in MNCH: indicators for global tracking of newborn care.测量母婴健康中的覆盖情况:新生儿护理全球跟踪指标。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001415. Epub 2013 May 7.