Suppr超能文献

家庭调查中新生儿产后护理的测量:覆盖范围、质量差距以及应答内部的不一致性。

Household Survey Measurement of Newborn Postnatal Care: Coverage, Quality Gaps, and Internal Inconsistencies in Responses.

机构信息

Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Maternal and Newborn Health Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, & Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Dec 21;9(4):737-751. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00209. Print 2021 Dec 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reliable measurement of newborn postnatal care is essential to understand gaps in coverage and quality and thereby improve outcomes. This study examined gaps in coverage and measurement of newborn postnatal care in the first 2 days of life.

METHODS

We analyzed Demographic and Health Survey data from 15 countries for 71,366 births to measure the gap between postnatal contact coverage and content coverage within 2 days of birth. Coverage was a contact with the health system in the first 2 days (postnatal check or newborn care intervention), and quality was defined as reported receipt of 5 health worker-provided interventions. We examined internal consistency between interrelated questions regarding examination of the umbilical cord.

RESULTS

Reported coverage of postnatal check ranged from 13% in Ethiopia to 78% in Senegal. Report of specific newborn care interventions varied widely by intervention within and between countries. Quality-coverage gaps were high, ranging from 26% in Malawi to 89% in Burundi. We found some internally inconsistent reporting of newborn care. The percentage of women who reported that a health care provider checked their newborn's umbilical cord but responded "no" to the postnatal check question was as high as 16% in Malawi.

CONCLUSION

Reliable measurement of coverage and content of early postnatal newborn care is essential to track progress in improving quality of care. Postnatal contact coverage is challenging to measure because it may be difficult for women to distinguish postnatal care from intrapartum care and it is a less recognizable concept than antenatal care. Co-coverage measures may provide a useful summary of contact and content, reflecting both coverage and an aspect of quality.

摘要

背景

可靠地测量新生儿产后护理至关重要,这有助于了解覆盖范围和质量方面的差距,从而改善结果。本研究检查了在生命的头两天中新生儿产后护理覆盖范围和测量方面的差距。

方法

我们分析了来自 15 个国家的 151366 例分娩的人口与健康调查数据,以衡量出生后 2 天内的接触覆盖范围和内容覆盖范围之间的差距。覆盖范围是指在头两天内与卫生系统的接触(产后检查或新生儿护理干预),而质量则定义为报告接受了 5 项卫生工作者提供的干预措施。我们检查了有关脐带检查的相关问题之间的内部一致性。

结果

报告的产后检查覆盖率从埃塞俄比亚的 13%到塞内加尔的 78%不等。特定的新生儿护理干预措施的报告在国家内部和国家之间差异很大。质量覆盖范围差距很大,从马拉维的 26%到布隆迪的 89%不等。我们发现新生儿护理报告存在一些内部不一致的情况。报告卫生保健提供者检查了新生儿脐带但对产后检查问题回答“否”的妇女比例高达马拉维的 16%。

结论

可靠地测量早期产后新生儿护理的覆盖范围和内容对于跟踪改善护理质量的进展至关重要。由于妇女可能难以将产后护理与分娩期间的护理区分开来,并且由于它不如产前护理那样容易被认可,因此产后接触覆盖范围的测量具有挑战性。共同覆盖措施可能会提供接触和内容的有用总结,反映覆盖范围和质量的一个方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eef/8691891/8dae9939adc7/GH-GHSP210082F001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验