Villalba Karina, Cook Christa, Dévieux Jessy G, Ibanez Gladys E, Oghogho Etinosa, Neira Camila, Cook Robert L
Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Heliyon. 2020 Mar 26;6(3):e03612. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03612. eCollection 2020 Mar.
Research on contingency management is limited due to feasibility issues with monitoring adherence. Incentives usually depend on objective measures to verify compliance; therefore, biological markers for identifying alcohol use are not as dependable for the use of financial contingency studies. The Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM) is an objective alcohol biosensor that can be locked onto a person's ankle to address these limitations. In preparation for a large, contingency management study for HIV-positive and HIV-negative persons with heavy drinking, the aims for the study were to (1) explore barriers and facilitators to participating in a contingency management intervention using the SCRAM ankle monitor as the potential alcohol measure for the intervention; (2) explore levels of appropriate compensation for using the SCRAM and for study assessments as part of a contingency management intervention study; and (3) attitudes and beliefs on lifestyle changes as a consequence of wearing the SCRAM among HIV-positive and HIV-negative heavy drinkers in Florida. Five focus groups were conducted and we collected qualitative data from thirty-seven individuals (18 men; 19 women). During the analysis, six themes were identified as barriers and facilitators for participation in a contingency management intervention using the SCRAM sensor to measure alcohol use: (1) health assessment, (2) monetary incentives including payment structure and levels of compensation, (3) stigma associated with wearing the SCRAM sensor, (4) aesthetics and other related concerns with wearing the SCRAM sensor, (5) motivation to stop drinking, and (6) social support. Stigma was a major barrier for wearing the SCRAM sensor; however, if participants were motivated to change their behavior then the monetary incentives became a facilitator to wearing the sensor. In addition to the financial contingency method, social support may further increase the odds for participants to change their behaviors.
由于监测依从性存在可行性问题,应急管理的研究受到限制。激励措施通常依赖客观指标来核实依从情况;因此,用于识别饮酒情况的生物标志物在财务应急研究中的可靠性不如其他指标。安全连续远程酒精监测仪(SCRAM)是一种客观的酒精生物传感器,可以固定在人的脚踝上,以解决这些局限性。在为一项针对大量酗酒的艾滋病毒阳性和阴性患者的应急管理大型研究做准备时,该研究的目的是:(1)探讨使用SCRAM脚踝监测仪作为干预措施中潜在酒精测量方法参与应急管理干预的障碍和促进因素;(2)探讨在应急管理干预研究中使用SCRAM和进行研究评估的适当补偿水平;(3)佛罗里达州艾滋病毒阳性和阴性酗酒者佩戴SCRAM后对生活方式改变的态度和信念。开展了五个焦点小组讨论,我们从37个人(18名男性;19名女性)那里收集了定性数据。在分析过程中,确定了六个主题,作为使用SCRAM传感器测量酒精使用情况参与应急管理干预的障碍和促进因素:(1)健康评估,(2)金钱激励,包括支付结构和补偿水平,(3)与佩戴SCRAM传感器相关的耻辱感,(4)佩戴SCRAM传感器的美观性及其他相关问题,(5)戒酒动机,(6)社会支持。耻辱感是佩戴SCRAM传感器的主要障碍;然而,如果参与者有改变行为的动机,那么金钱激励就会成为佩戴该传感器的促进因素。除了财务应急方法外,社会支持可能会进一步增加参与者改变行为的几率。