Ramada Faria Gil Filipe, Nunes Santos Jorge Manuel, Simonson Donald C
Department of Surgery, Unidade de Investigação em Cirurgia Digestiva e Metabólica, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Sto António, Portugal.
Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, Portugal.
Porto Biomed J. 2017 Mar-Apr;2(2):40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.pbj.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
Quality-of-life measures improve as early as 3 months after bariatric surgery.There is wide variability in reporting that renders direct comparisons difficult.The available comparisons between RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy could not detect any difference.Improvement in PRO measures might be related to weight loss.Larger and better designed studies are required to achieve discrimination in PRO measures.
Obesity is associated with reduced quality-of-life (QoL), which generally improves after bariatric surgery. The differential effect of each type of surgery (gastric sleeve [SG] and gastric bypass [RYGB]) on QoL is not yet fully understood.
To understand which of these surgeries offers greatest improvement in QoL and patient satisfaction.
Systematic literature search on Pubmed in July 2014. Relevant articles were selected in a step-wise approach. The 2482 titles were scanned for relevance and 191 were selected for abstract reviewing; and 88 papers were selected for full text analysis.
Only 5 papers compared the 2 techniques and only 17 more had retrievable data either on SG or RYGB. The reports were very heterogeneous, preventing a direct comparison of patient reported outcomes (PRO) among studies.Improved results have been reported as early has 3 months and SF-36 scores were improved in all domains in medium to long-term. The question remains whether the improvement in QoL is related to the weight loss and which factors are associated with improved patients' perceptions.
There is wide heterogeneity in the reporting of PRO measures after bariatric surgery, but data is consistent with a significant improvement after both surgeries.Larger and better-designed studies are required to understand if there are significant differences in the quality of life after SG or RYGB.
减肥手术后仅3个月,生活质量指标就有所改善。报告存在很大差异,难以进行直接比较。Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)和袖状胃切除术之间的现有比较未发现任何差异。患者报告结局(PRO)指标的改善可能与体重减轻有关。需要开展规模更大、设计更优的研究,以区分PRO指标。
肥胖与生活质量(QoL)下降相关,减肥手术后QoL通常会改善。每种手术类型(袖状胃切除术[SG]和胃旁路术[RYGB])对QoL的不同影响尚未完全明确。
了解哪种手术能最大程度改善QoL和患者满意度。
2014年7月在PubMed上进行系统文献检索。采用逐步筛选的方法选择相关文章。对2482篇标题进行相关性筛选,191篇入选进行摘要评审;88篇论文入选进行全文分析。
仅5篇论文比较了这两种技术,另外只有17篇有关于SG或RYGB的可检索数据。报告差异很大,无法直接比较各研究中患者报告的结局(PRO)。术后3个月就已报告有改善结果,中长期所有领域的SF-36评分均有所提高。问题仍然是QoL的改善是否与体重减轻有关,以及哪些因素与患者认知的改善相关。
减肥手术后PRO指标的报告存在很大异质性,但数据表明两种手术均能带来显著改善。需要开展规模更大、设计更优的研究,以了解SG或RYGB术后生活质量是否存在显著差异。