• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区与移民群体在健康和保健研究方面的互动:制定社区参与定义、框架和方法分类法的系统评价方案。

Community engagement with immigrant communities involving health and wellness research: a systematic review protocol towards developing a taxonomy of community engagement definitions, frameworks, and methods.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 6;10(4):e035649. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035649.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035649
PMID:32265248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7245376/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The importance of community engagement has been established globally in health and wellness research. A certain degree of ambiguity remains, however, regarding the meaning of community engagement, which term has been used for various purposes and implemented in various forms. In this study, we aimed to explore the different definitions of community engagement, discuss the various objectives that have been proposed and uncover the diverse ways this concept has been implemented among researchers working for the betterment of the health and wellness of immigrant communities in host countries.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Taxonomy is a process for classifying complex and multifaceted matters using logical conceptual domains and dimensions for clearer way of contextualising. We will develop a taxonomy to organise the available literature on community engagement in immigrant health and wellness research in a way that captures user knowledge and understanding of its various meanings and processes. Specific methodological and analytical frameworks for systematic review and taxonomy development will guide each step. We will conduct a comprehensive systematic search in relevant databases, from inception to December 2019, using appropriate keywords followed by snowball search (single-citation tracking, reference lists). Papers will be included if they fall within predefined inclusion criteria (seen as most likely informative on elements pertaining to community engagement) and are written in English, regardless of design (conceptual, qualitative and quantitative). Two reviewers will independently employ two-stage screening (title-abstract screening followed by screening of the full text to determine inclusion). Finally, information that helps to develop taxonomy of the concept and practice of community engagement will be abstracted and used towards taxonomy development, where different levels of stakeholder research team members will be involved.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review. We have opted for an integrated knowledge translation or a community-engaged knowledge mobilisation approach where we are engaged with community-based citizen researchers from the inception of our programme. We plan to disseminate the results of our review through meetings with key stakeholders, followed by journal publications and presentations at applicable platforms.

摘要

简介

社区参与在全球健康和健康研究中具有重要意义。然而,对于社区参与的含义仍然存在一定程度的模糊性,该术语已被用于各种目的,并以各种形式实施。在这项研究中,我们旨在探讨社区参与的不同定义,讨论提出的各种目标,并揭示从事改善东道国移民社区健康和健康工作的研究人员实施这一概念的不同方式。

方法和分析

分类是使用逻辑概念领域和维度对复杂和多方面的事物进行分类的过程,以便更清晰地进行语境化。我们将开发一个分类法,以组织关于移民健康和健康研究中社区参与的现有文献,以捕捉用户对其各种含义和过程的知识和理解。系统评价和分类法开发的具体方法和分析框架将指导每个步骤。我们将在相关数据库中进行全面的系统搜索,从开始到 2019 年 12 月,使用适当的关键字,然后进行滚雪球搜索(单引文跟踪,参考文献列表)。如果论文符合预定义的纳入标准(被视为最有可能提供有关社区参与要素的信息)且以英文撰写,无论设计如何(概念、定性和定量),都将被纳入。两名审查员将独立使用两阶段筛选(标题-摘要筛选,然后筛选全文以确定纳入)。最后,有助于开发社区参与概念和实践分类法的信息将被摘录并用于分类法开发,其中将涉及不同级别的利益相关者研究团队成员。

伦理与传播

本系统评价不需要伦理批准。我们选择了一种综合知识转化或社区参与的知识动员方法,从我们计划的开始,我们就与社区公民研究人员合作。我们计划通过与主要利益相关者举行会议,然后在适用的平台上发表期刊文章和演讲,来传播我们审查的结果。

相似文献

1
Community engagement with immigrant communities involving health and wellness research: a systematic review protocol towards developing a taxonomy of community engagement definitions, frameworks, and methods.社区与移民群体在健康和保健研究方面的互动:制定社区参与定义、框架和方法分类法的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 6;10(4):e035649. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035649.
2
Knowledge mobilisation in bridging community-practice-academia-policy through meaningful engagement: systematic integrative review protocol focusing on studies conducted on health and wellness among immigrant communities.通过有意义的参与在社区实践-学术-政策之间进行知识转化:以移民群体健康和保健为重点的系统综合评价方案的研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 8;10(4):e036081. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036081.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Primary care access barriers faced by immigrant populations in their host countries: a systematic review protocol aiming to construct a conceptual framework using root cause analysis to capture 'what leads to what'.目的国家的移民群体在获得初级保健方面面临的障碍:一项系统评价方案,旨在使用根本原因分析构建一个概念框架,以捕捉“是什么导致了什么”。
J Prim Health Care. 2020 Jun;12(2):139-148. doi: 10.1071/HC20006.
5
Health and well-being literacy initiatives focusing on immigrant communities: an environmental scan protocol to identify "what works and what does not".关注移民群体的健康与福利素养倡议:一项旨在确定“有效做法和无效做法”的环境扫描方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 20;9(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01340-7.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Waves of hurt faced by families due to a hospitalised relative with COVID-19 in the Cape Flats.开普敦贫民区因有亲属感染新冠病毒住院而面临伤痛的家庭。
Health SA. 2025 Mar 25;30:2754. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2754. eCollection 2025.
2
Color coded health data: factors related to willingness to share health information in South Asian community members in Canada.彩色编码健康数据:加拿大南亚裔社区成员分享健康信息意愿的相关因素。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023 Jun 20;8(1):2134. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2134. eCollection 2023.
3
Competence in Daily Activities and Mental Well-Being among Technical Intern Trainees in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Immigrant community integration in world cities.世界城市的移民社区融合。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 14;13(3):e0191612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191612. eCollection 2018.
2
Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions.社区参与叙事:公共卫生干预措施的系统评价衍生概念框架
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 11;17(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4958-4.
3
An evidence-based framework on community-centred approaches for health: England, UK.基于证据的以社区为中心的健康方法框架:英国英格兰
日本技能实习生日常生活活动能力与心理健康状况的关系:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3189. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063189.
4
Community voice in cross-sector alignment: concepts and strategies from a scoping review of the health collaboration literature.社区声音在跨部门协同中的作用:健康合作文献综述中的概念和策略。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 13;21(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10741-9.
Health Promot Int. 2019 Apr 1;34(2):356-366. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax083.
4
Why do older people with multi-morbidity experience unplanned hospital admissions from the community: a root cause analysis.患有多种疾病的老年人为何会从社区意外入院:根本原因分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 27;15:525. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1170-z.
5
Evaluating community engagement in global health research: the need for metrics.评估全球卫生研究中的社区参与:对衡量指标的需求。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Jul 1;16:44. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0033-9.
6
Working with Concepts: The Role of Community in International Collaborative Biomedical Research.与概念合作:社区在国际合作生物医学研究中的作用。
Public Health Ethics. 2011 Apr;4(1):26-39. doi: 10.1093/phe/phr007. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
7
Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review.社区参与研究:教育和同行评审框架。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Aug;100(8):1380-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.178137. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
8
Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity.基于社区的参与式研究对干预研究的贡献:科学与实践的交叉点,以改善健康公平。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 1;100 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S40-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
9
A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews.一种用于评估混合方法研究的评分系统,同时也用于在混合研究综述中评估定性、定量和混合方法的原始研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Apr;46(4):529-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
10
Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.卫生服务研究的定性数据分析:构建分类法、主题和理论。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1758-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x.