Suppr超能文献

从肺泡微力学中汲取的机械通气经验教训。

Mechanical Ventilation Lessons Learned From Alveolar Micromechanics.

作者信息

Kollisch-Singule Michaela, Satalin Joshua, Blair Sarah J, Andrews Penny L, Gatto Louis A, Nieman Gary F, Habashi Nader M

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR, United States.

Department of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2020 Mar 24;11:233. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00233. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Morbidity and mortality associated with lung injury remains disappointingly unchanged over the last two decades, in part due to the current reliance on lung macro-parameters set on the ventilator instead of considering the micro-environment and the response of the alveoli and alveolar ducts to ventilator adjustments. The response of alveoli and alveolar ducts to mechanical ventilation modes cannot be predicted with current bedside methods of assessment including lung compliance, oxygenation, and pressure-volume curves. Alveolar tidal volumes (Vt) are less determined by the Vt set on the mechanical ventilator and more dependent on the number of recruited alveoli available to accommodate that Vt and their heterogeneous mechanical properties, such that high lung Vt can lead to a low alveolar Vt and low Vt can lead to high alveolar Vt. The degree of alveolar heterogeneity that exists cannot be predicted based on lung calculations that average the individual alveolar Vt and compliance. Finally, the importance of time in promoting alveolar stability, specifically the inspiratory and expiratory times set on the ventilator, are currently under-appreciated. In order to improve outcomes related to lung injury, the respiratory physiology of the individual patient, specifically at the level of the alveolus, must be targeted. With experimental data, this review highlights some of the known mechanical ventilation adjustments that are helpful or harmful at the level of the alveolus.

摘要

在过去二十年中,与肺损伤相关的发病率和死亡率仍令人失望地保持不变,部分原因是目前依赖呼吸机设置的肺部宏观参数,而不是考虑微环境以及肺泡和肺泡管对呼吸机调整的反应。目前的床边评估方法,包括肺顺应性、氧合和压力-容积曲线,无法预测肺泡和肺泡管对机械通气模式的反应。肺泡潮气量(Vt)较少取决于机械呼吸机设置的Vt,而更多地依赖于可容纳该Vt的募集肺泡数量及其异质性机械特性,因此高肺Vt可导致低肺泡Vt,低Vt可导致高肺泡Vt。基于对个体肺泡Vt和顺应性进行平均的肺部计算,无法预测存在的肺泡异质性程度。最后,时间在促进肺泡稳定性方面的重要性,特别是呼吸机设置的吸气和呼气时间,目前尚未得到充分认识。为了改善与肺损伤相关的结局,必须针对个体患者的呼吸生理学,特别是肺泡水平的呼吸生理学。结合实验数据,本综述强调了一些已知的在肺泡水平上有帮助或有害的机械通气调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2252/7105828/fe4a67cff0b2/fphys-11-00233-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验