• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using, risking, and consent: Why risking harm to bystanders is morally different from risking harm to research subjects.使用、冒险和同意:为什么冒险伤害旁观者在道德上与冒险伤害研究对象不同。
Bioethics. 2020 Nov;34(9):899-905. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12743. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
2
Bystanders, risks, and consent.旁观者、风险和同意。
Bioethics. 2020 Nov;34(9):906-911. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12673. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
3
Risky research and bystander consent.风险研究与旁观者同意。
Bioethics. 2020 Nov;34(9):912-917. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12811. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Sex partners as bystanders in HIV prevention trials: Two test cases for research ethics.艾滋病毒预防试验中的性伴侣作为旁观者:研究伦理的两个测试案例。
Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;16(5):455-457. doi: 10.1177/1740774519865878. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
Limitations of informed consent for in utero gene transfer research: implications for investigators and institutional review boards.子宫内基因转移研究知情同意的局限性:对研究者和机构审查委员会的启示
Hum Gene Ther. 2000 May 1;11(7):1057-63. doi: 10.1089/10430340050015365.
6
The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes--chapter 7: Informed consent and xenotransplantation clinical trials.国际异种移植协会关于开展1型糖尿病猪胰岛产品临床试验条件的共识声明——第7章:知情同意与异种移植临床试验
Xenotransplantation. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):255-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00546.x.
7
Bystanders and ethical review of research: Proceed with caution.旁观者与研究的伦理审查:谨慎行事。
Bioethics. 2020 Nov;34(9):937-940. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12823. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
8
Informed consent for research in Borderline Personality Disorder.边缘型人格障碍研究的知情同意书。
BMC Med Ethics. 2007 May 10;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-4.
9
Respecting autonomy without disclosing information.尊重自主权而不披露信息。
Bioethics. 2013 Sep;27(7):388-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01971.x. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
10
The Ethics of Research That May Disadvantage Others.可能使他人处于不利地位的研究的伦理问题。
Ethics Hum Res. 2021 Jan;43(1):2-16. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500074.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing CRISPR/Cas9 potential in SDG3 attainment: malaria elimination-regulatory and community engagement landscape.评估 CRISPR/Cas9 在实现可持续发展目标 3 方面的潜力:消除疟疾——监管和社区参与格局。
Malar J. 2024 Jun 19;23(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-04996-x.
2
Defending and Defining Environmental Responsibilities for the Health Research Sector.捍卫和界定健康研究领域的环境责任。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Jun 6;30(3):25. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00487-z.
3
A partner protection package for HIV cure-related trials involving analytical treatment interruptions.涉及分析性治疗中断的 HIV 治愈相关试验的合作伙伴保护方案。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Oct;23(10):e418-e430. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00267-0. Epub 2023 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The ethics of biosafety considerations in gain-of-function research resulting in the creation of potential pandemic pathogens.功能获得性研究中生物安全考量的伦理问题,该研究导致了潜在大流行病原体的产生。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Nov;41(11):901-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102619. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
2
Missing the forest: further thoughts on the ethics of bystander risk in medical research.只见树木,不见森林:关于医学研究中旁观者风险伦理的进一步思考
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2007 Fall;16(4):483-90. doi: 10.1017/s0963180107070648.
3
Third-party risks in research: should IRBs address them?研究中的第三方风险:机构审查委员会应处理这些风险吗?
IRB. 2007 May-Jun;29(3):1-5.
4
Protecting third parties in human subjects research.在人体研究中保护第三方。
IRB. 2006 Jul-Aug;28(4):1-7.
5
Does informed consent to research require comprehension?对研究的知情同意是否需要理解?
Lancet. 2003 Dec 13;362(9400):2016-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15025-8.
6
Respect for persons, informed consent and the assessment of infectious disease risks in xenotransplantation.尊重人格、知情同意与异种移植中传染病风险评估
Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(1):53-70. doi: 10.1023/a:1009972928996.
7
Informed consent in therapy and experimentation.治疗与实验中的知情同意。
J Med Philos. 1977 Dec;2(4):307-29. doi: 10.1093/jmp/2.4.307.

使用、冒险和同意:为什么冒险伤害旁观者在道德上与冒险伤害研究对象不同。

Using, risking, and consent: Why risking harm to bystanders is morally different from risking harm to research subjects.

机构信息

Rutgers University School of Law, Camden, NJ, 08102-1519, USA.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2020 Nov;34(9):899-905. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12743. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1111/bioe.12743
PMID:32266732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7541549/
Abstract

Subjects in studies on humans are used as a means of conducting the research and achieving whatever good would justify putting them at risk. Accordingly, consent must normally be obtained before subjects are exposed to any substantial risks to their welfare. Bystanders are also often put at risk, but they are not used as a means. Accordingly-or so I argue-consent is more often unnecessary before bystanders are exposed to similar substantial risks to their welfare.

摘要

在以人为研究对象的研究中,会将人作为一种手段来进行研究,以实现任何有理由让人承担风险的好处。因此,通常必须在研究对象面临对其福利造成实质性风险之前获得同意。旁观者也经常面临风险,但他们不作为一种手段。因此——或者我认为——在旁观者面临类似对其福利造成实质性风险之前,同意通常不是必需的。