Suppr超能文献

初级卫生保健策略与精神障碍治疗结果的相关性。

Associations between primary health care strategies and outcomes of mental disorders.

机构信息

Departamento de Medicina Social, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Departamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento, FMRP, USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;42(4):360-366. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0659. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate associations between the percentage and severity of mental disorders (MD) and three different primary health care (PHC) strategies in Brazil: traditional care (TC), the Family Health Strategy (FHS), and FHS with shared mental health care (FHS+SC).

METHODS

Random samples were selected from three different areas of a Brazilian city. Each area was served by a different PHC strategy (TC, FHS, or FHS+SC). Five mental health professionals, blinded to the type of PHC strategy delivered in each area, conducted interviews using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and other specific instruments to assess the prevalence and severity of MD.

RESULTS

530 subjects were interviewed. The TC strategy was significantly associated with a higher percentage of MD when compared to FHS and FHS+SC. These results were not affected by adjustment for sociodemographic variables. The difference in prevalence of MD between the two FHS areas (with and without SC) was not statistically significant. No significant differences in MD severity were observed across the three PHC strategies.

CONCLUSION

Areas covered by FHS showed a lower percentage of MD than those covered by TC. Presence of SC did not influence the prevalence of MD, suggesting that mental-health training of FHS teams may have minimized the influence of SC.

摘要

目的

探讨在巴西,三种不同的初级卫生保健(PHC)策略(传统保健(TC)、家庭健康策略(FHS)和 FHS 与共享心理健康保健(FHS+SC))与精神障碍(MD)的百分比和严重程度之间的关联。

方法

从巴西一个城市的三个不同区域中随机抽取样本。每个区域都由不同的 PHC 策略(TC、FHS 或 FHS+SC)提供服务。五位心理健康专业人员在不知道每个区域提供的 PHC 策略类型的情况下,使用 Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview(MINI)和其他特定工具进行访谈,以评估 MD 的患病率和严重程度。

结果

对 530 名受访者进行了访谈。与 FHS 和 FHS+SC 相比,TC 策略与 MD 的百分比显著相关。这些结果不受社会人口统计学变量调整的影响。两个 FHS 区域(有和没有 SC)之间 MD 患病率的差异无统计学意义。在三种 PHC 策略中,MD 的严重程度没有观察到显著差异。

结论

FHS 覆盖的区域 MD 的比例低于 TC 覆盖的区域。SC 的存在并未影响 MD 的患病率,这表明 FHS 团队的心理健康培训可能已经将 SC 的影响降到了最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cb6/7430389/b8e78cc24f73/bjp-42-04-360-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验