Forti Samanta, Serbena Carlos Augusto, Scaduto Alessandro Antonio
Departamento de Psicologia, Setor de Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal do Paraná. Praça Santos Andrade 50, Ala Alfredo Buffren, Centro. 80020-300 Curirtiba PR Brasil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Mar;25(4):1463-1474. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020254.21672018. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
Spirituality/religiousness has been regarded as an important dimension for health studies and services. The present study consists of a systematic review on health and spirituality/religiousness, specifically, instruments for its measurement. In order to do so, we searched for papers using the keywords "scales spirituality religiousness" and "scales spirituality religiousness and health" in CAPES, DOAJ, Lilacs, Pubmed, Scielo and Web of Science, from 2000 to 2017. The search returned 500 studies, from which 35 were selected, considering their originality, availability, language (English or Portuguese), and description of scales for measuring spirituality/religiousness and adapted for the Brazilian culture. From such papers, 16 instruments were identified; the instruments with most studies were the WHOQOL-100 (as well as its reduced version and the SRPB module), the Spiritual Well-Being Scale and the RCOPE scale. We conclude that studies on this field are scarce, for, although many instruments are described, the continuity of their validation is poor.
精神性/宗教信仰已被视为健康研究与服务的一个重要维度。本研究包括对健康与精神性/宗教信仰，特别是其测量工具的系统综述。为此，我们于2000年至2017年期间在CAPES、DOAJ、Lilacs、Pubmed、Scielo和科学网中使用关键词“精神性宗教信仰量表”和“精神性宗教信仰与健康量表”搜索论文。搜索结果有500项研究，从中选取了35项，考虑了它们的原创性、可得性、语言（英语或葡萄牙语）以及测量精神性/宗教信仰且适用于巴西文化的量表描述。从这些论文中，识别出了16种工具；研究最多的工具是世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表100（以及其简化版和SRPB模块）、精神幸福感量表和RCOPE量表。我们得出结论，该领域的研究较少，因为尽管描述了许多工具，但其验证的连续性较差。
