Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Department of Animal Production, College of Technology and Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Dracena, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Anim Sci. 2020 May 1;98(5). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa114.
The objectives of this study were to compare ruminal total tract digestibility, bacterial communities, and eating and rumination activity between Holstein and Angus steers fed grain- or forage-based diets. Six Holstein steers (average body weight [BW] = 483 ± 23 kg) and six Angus steers (average BW = 507 ± 29 kg), previously fitted with rumen cannulae, were fed in a crossover design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of four treatments: 1) Holsteins fed a grain-based diet, 2) Holsteins fed a forage-based diet, 3) Angus fed a grain-based diet, and 4) Angus fed a forage-based diet. Each period was 35 d with 26 d of diet adaptation and 9 d of sample collection. On days 1 and 2 of collection, feeding activity was recorded for 48 h. On day 3, rumen contents were sampled to measure ruminal pH at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 18 h after feeding. A portion of the strained ruminal fluid was subsampled at 0, 3, and 6 h for volatile fatty acids (VFA) analysis. Rumen contents were subsampled at 3 h for analysis of bacterial communities. From day 4 to 8, total fecal excretion, feed, and refusals samples were collected and analyzed for dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and starch. On days 8 and 9 (0 and 3 h post-feeding, respectively), total reticulorumen evacuation was conducted and contents were weighed. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedures in SAS (v9.4 SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). Repeated measures were used to analyze changes in ruminal pH and VFA over time. There were no interactions of diet × breed (P ≥ 0.07). While the main effects of diet were expected, unique to these data is the fact that bacterial diversity and richness were reduced (P < 0.01) in cattle fed grain-based diets. There was no main effect (P > 0.34) of breed on total tract DM, organic matter, and starch digestibility, but Angus cattle had greater (P = 0.01) NDF digestibility than Holsteins. The increased NDF digestibility may be associated with a numerical (P = 0.08) increased numbers of bacterial species in Angus steers compared with Holstein steers. Holstein steers also spent more time (P ≤ 0.05) ruminating than Angus steers. There was no effect (P > 0.80) of breed on reticulorumen content at feeding time; however, Holstein steers had greater (P = 0.04) reticulorumen content on a wet basis 3 h post-feeding. Although Holstein steers spent more time ruminating, Angus steers were better able to digest NDF when compared with Holsteins, regardless of basal diet, and this improvement may be related to changes in bacterial communities in the rumen or to rumination activity.
本研究的目的是比较荷斯坦和安格斯牛在饲喂谷物或纤维基础日粮时的瘤胃全肠道消化率、细菌群落和采食及反刍活动。6 头荷斯坦奶牛(平均体重[BW] = 483 ± 23 kg)和 6 头安格斯奶牛(平均 BW = 507 ± 29 kg),之前均安装有瘤胃套管,采用 2×2 因子交叉设计进行饲喂,有 4 种处理:1)荷斯坦牛饲喂谷物基础日粮,2)荷斯坦牛饲喂纤维基础日粮,3)安格斯牛饲喂谷物基础日粮,4)安格斯牛饲喂纤维基础日粮。每个周期为 35 d,其中 26 d 为适应期,9 d 为样品采集期。在采集的第 1 和第 2 天,记录 48 h 的采食活动。在第 3 天,在采食后 0、3、6、12 和 18 h 时采集瘤胃液,以测量瘤胃 pH 值。在 0、3 和 6 h 时采集部分过滤的瘤胃液,用于分析挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)。在 3 h 时采集瘤胃液样本,用于分析细菌群落。从第 4 天到第 8 天,收集总粪便排泄、饲料和拒食物样品,并分析干物质(DM)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)和淀粉。在第 8 天和第 9 天(分别为 0 和 3 h 后采食),进行总网胃排空,称重内容物。使用 SAS(v9.4 SAS Inst. Inc., Cary,NC)中的 MIXED 过程分析数据。使用重复测量分析瘤胃 pH 值和 VFA 的随时间变化。饮食×品种(P≥0.07)之间没有交互作用。虽然预期到饮食的主要作用,但这些数据的独特之处在于,饲喂谷物基础日粮的牛的细菌多样性和丰富度降低(P<0.01)。品种对全肠道 DM、有机物和淀粉消化率没有主要影响(P>0.34),但安格斯牛的 NDF 消化率高于荷斯坦牛(P=0.01)。NDF 消化率的增加可能与 Angus 牛的细菌种类数量增加(P=0.08)有关,与荷斯坦牛相比。荷斯坦牛比 Angus 牛反刍时间更长(P≤0.05)。品种对采食时的网胃内容物没有影响(P>0.80);然而,荷斯坦牛在采食后 3 h 时的网胃内容物的湿重更大(P=0.04)。尽管荷斯坦牛反刍时间更长,但与荷斯坦牛相比,安格斯牛对 NDF 的消化能力更强,无论基础日粮如何,这种改善可能与瘤胃细菌群落的变化或反刍活动有关。