DeBord Zachary L, Duncan Zachary M, Pflughoeft Madison G, Suhr Kyler J, Ellis William C, Hollenbeck William R, Montgomery Sean P, Spore Tyler J, Titgemeyer Evan C, Blasi Dale A, Tarpoff Anthony J
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Corn Belt Livestock Services, Papillion, NE 68046, USA.
Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Nov 19;8:txae161. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae161. eCollection 2024.
Experiments were conducted during the summers of 2021 and 2022 to evaluate the effects of feeding strategy and shade on growth performance, animal comfort, water usage, apparent diet digestibility, and ruminal fermentation characteristics of growing heifers during periods of heat stress. In Exp. 1, 852 heifers (initial body weight [BW] = 251 ± 13 kg) were assigned to one of 4 treatments: high-energy diet limit-fed at 2.2% of BW (dry matter [DM] basis; LIM) or high-roughage diet fed for ad libitum intake (ADLIB) with shade (SH) or without shade (NSH). Pen BWs were measured on day 0, weekly from days 14 to 84, day 90, and day 97. Pen weights were used to adjust weekly intakes of LIM. Refusals for ADLIB were targeted at 5% of feed consumed the previous day. Following the 90-d feeding period, a gut-fill equilibration diet was fed to all cattle at 2.5% of BW (DM basis) for 7 d to balance differences in gut-fill between dietary treatments. Dry matter intake was lesser ( < 0.01) for LIM compared with ADLIB. Average daily gain (ADG) and gain:feed (G:F) were greater ( < 0.01) for LIM compared with ADLIB. In addition, ADG and G:F were greater ( < 0.01) for SH compared with NSH. Water usage was less ( < 0.01) for SH heifers compared with NSH and was also less ( < 0.01) for LIM compared with ADLIB. Mean panting scores were lower ( < 0.01) for SH compared with NSH and LIM compared with ADLIB. In Exp. 2, 16 heifers (initial BW = 254 ± 22 kg) were arranged in 4 replicated 4 × 4 Latin squares to evaluate treatments from Exp. 1. Apparent total tract digestibility of DM and organic matter was greater ( < 0.01) for LIM compared with ADLIB. Ruminal pH was more acidic ( = 0.02) for LIM compared with ADLIB. Shade did not affect ( ≥ 0.68) apparent diet digestibility; however, ruminal pH was greater ( < 0.01) for SH compared with NSH. In conclusion, LIM improved feed efficiency, reduced mean panting score, and reduced water usage compared with ADLIB. In addition, SH improved growth performance, reduced water usage, and improved animal comfort during periods of heat stress.
在2021年和2022年夏季进行了试验,以评估饲养策略和遮荫对热应激期间生长小母牛的生长性能、动物舒适度、水的使用、表观日粮消化率和瘤胃发酵特性的影响。在试验1中,852头小母牛(初始体重[BW]=251±13千克)被分配到4种处理之一:以体重的2.2%进行高能量日粮限量饲喂(干物质[DM]基础;LIM),或以随意采食方式饲喂高粗饲料日粮(ADLIB),有遮荫(SH)或无遮荫(NSH)。在第0天、从第14天到第84天每周、第90天和第97天测量栏内体重。栏内体重用于调整LIM的每周摄入量。ADLIB的剩料目标是前一天采食饲料量的5%。在90天的饲喂期之后,给所有牛饲喂占体重2.5%(DM基础)的肠道充盈平衡日粮,持续7天,以平衡日粮处理之间肠道充盈的差异。与ADLIB相比,LIM的干物质摄入量较少(<0.01)。与ADLIB相比,LIM的平均日增重(ADG)和增重:饲料比(G:F)更高(<0.01)。此外,与NSH相比,SH的ADG和G:F更高(<0.01)。与NSH相比,SH小母牛的水使用量较少(<0.01),与ADLIB相比,LIM的水使用量也较少(<0.01)。与NSH相比,SH的平均气喘评分较低(<0.01),与ADLIB相比,LIM的平均气喘评分较低(<0.01)。在试验2中,16头小母牛(初始BW=254±22千克)被安排在4个重复的4×4拉丁方中,以评估试验1中的处理。与ADLIB相比,LIM的DM和有机物质的表观全消化道消化率更高(<0.01)。与ADLIB相比,LIM的瘤胃pH值更偏酸性(=0.02)。遮荫对表观日粮消化率没有影响(≥0.68);然而,与NSH相比,SH的瘤胃pH值更高(<0.01)。总之,与ADLIB相比,LIM提高了饲料效率,降低了平均气喘评分,并减少了水的使用。此外,SH在热应激期间提高了生长性能,减少了水的使用,并改善了动物舒适度。