Suppr超能文献

激活非活跃献血者的有效方法:一项分层随机对照研究。

Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study.

机构信息

Guangzhou Blood Center, 7th F., 31st Luyuan Rd. Yuexiu Dist, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

The Key Medical Disciplines and Specialties Program of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 10;20(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08594-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recruiting of sufficient numbers of donors of blood products is vital worldwide. In this study we assessed the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of telephone calls and SMS reminders for re-recruitment of inactive blood donors.

METHODS

This single-centre, non-blinded, parallel randomised controlled trial in Guangzhou, China included 11,880 inactive blood donors whose last donation was between January 1 and June 30, 2014. The donors were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups (telephone call or short message service [SMS] communications) or to a control group without intervention. SMS messages with altruistic appeal were adopted in the SMS group; in addition to altruistic appeal, reasons for deferral of blood donation were also asked in the telephone group. All participants were followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome was re-donation rate, and rates in different groups were compared by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). Secondary outcomes were the self-reported deterrents. Other outcomes included the re-donation interval, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of telephone calls and SMS reminders on re-recruitment.

RESULTS

ITT analysis revealed no significant differences in the re-donation rate among the three groups. ATT estimations indicated that among compliers, telephone calls significantly increased re-donation compared to both SMS reminders and no intervention. Donor return behaviour was positively associated with receiving reminders successfully, being male, older age, and previous donation history. The SMS reminder prompted donors to return sooner than no reminder within 6 months, and according to ICER calculations, SMS reminders were more cost-effective than telephone calls. Donors reported time constraints as the most main causes of self-deferral in the telephone group, and altruistic appeal had a positive effect on these donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions to reactivate inactive blood donors can be effective, with telephone calls prompting more donors to return but at a greater cost than SMS messages. SMS reminder with altruistic appeal can urge donors to re-donate sooner within 6 months than no reminder.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03366441 (Reactivation of Inactive Blood Donors). Retrospectively registered 4 December 2017.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,招募足够数量的血液制品捐献者至关重要。本研究评估了电话和短信提醒在重新招募非活跃献血者方面的效果和成本效益。

方法

这项在中国广州进行的单中心、非盲、平行随机对照试验纳入了 11880 名非活跃献血者,他们最后一次献血时间在 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日之间。献血者被随机分配到两组干预组(电话或短信服务 [SMS] 通讯)或对照组(无干预)。短信组采用利他主义诉求的短信;电话组除了利他主义诉求外,还询问了献血推迟的原因。所有参与者均随访 1 年。主要结局是再次献血率,通过意向治疗(ITT)分析和治疗效果平均估计值(ATT)比较不同组的献血率。次要结局是自我报告的阻碍因素。其他结局包括再次献血间隔和电话和短信提醒重新招募的增量成本效益比(ICER)。

结果

ITT 分析显示三组间再次献血率无显著差异。ATT 估计表明,在遵守者中,与短信提醒和无干预相比,电话显著增加了再次献血。献血者的返回行为与成功收到提醒、男性、年龄较大和以前的献血史呈正相关。与无提醒相比,短信提醒在 6 个月内促使更多的献血者更早返回,根据 ICER 计算,短信提醒比电话更具成本效益。在电话组中,献血者报告时间限制是自我推迟的主要原因,利他主义诉求对这些献血者有积极影响。

结论

重新激活非活跃献血者的干预措施可能是有效的,电话提示更多的献血者返回,但成本高于短信。带有利他主义诉求的短信提醒可以促使献血者在 6 个月内比无提醒更早地再次献血。

试验注册

NCT03366441(非活跃献血者的再激活)。于 2017 年 12 月 4 日回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/800e/7147048/b51f968f9cd3/12889_2020_8594_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验