Ket Shara N, Mangira Dileep, Ng Allysia, Tjandra Douglas, Koo Ja H, La Nauze Richard, Metz Andrew, Moss Alan, Brown Gregor
Department of Gastroenterology Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.
JGH Open. 2019 Aug 18;4(2):172-177. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12243. eCollection 2020 Apr.
Cold snare polypectomy is safe and efficacious for removing polyps <10 mm with reduced rates of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding and postpolypectomy syndrome. This technique can also be used for sessile polyps ≥10 mm; however, further evidence is required to establish its safety. The aim of this study was to compare intraprocedure and postprocedure adverse events in patients who underwent cold (CSP) hot snare polypectomy (HSP) of 10-20 mm sessile colonic polyps.
Electronic medical records and endoscopy reports of all patients who underwent polypectomy for Paris 0-IIa, Is, or 0-IIa + Is 10-20 mm colonic polyps between January 2015 and June 2017 at three tertiary academic hospitals and one private hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Data on patient demographics, polyp characteristics, method of polypectomy, and intraprocedural and postpolypectomy adverse events were collected.
A total of 408 patients (median age 67, 50% male) had 604 polyps, 10-20 mm in size, removed. Of these, 258 polyps were removed by HSP, with a median size of 15 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 12-20), compared to 346 polyps that were removed by CSP, with median size of 12 mm (IQR 10-15), < 0.001. In the HSP group, 15 patients presented with postprocedure complications, including 11 with clinically significant bleeding, 2 with postpolypectomy syndrome, and 2 with abdominal pain. This compares with no postpolypectomy complications in the CSP group, < 0.001.
In this study, CSP was not associated with any postpolypectomy adverse events. CSP appears to be safer than HSP for removing 10-20 mm-sized sessile polyps. A prospective multicenter study has been commenced to verify these findings and to assess the efficacy of CSP for the complete resection of polyps of this size.
冷圈套息肉切除术对于切除直径小于10毫米的息肉安全有效,可降低息肉切除术后延迟出血和息肉切除术后综合征的发生率。该技术也可用于直径大于等于10毫米的无蒂息肉;然而,需要更多证据来确定其安全性。本研究的目的是比较接受10 - 20毫米无蒂结肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)和热圈套息肉切除术(HSP)的患者术中及术后不良事件。
回顾性分析2015年1月至2017年6月期间在三家三级学术医院和一家私立医院接受巴黎0-IIa、Is或0-IIa + Is型10 - 20毫米结肠息肉切除术的所有患者的电子病历和内镜报告。收集患者人口统计学数据、息肉特征、息肉切除方法以及术中及息肉切除术后不良事件的数据。
共有408例患者(中位年龄67岁,50%为男性)切除了604枚直径10 - 20毫米的息肉。其中,258枚息肉通过HSP切除,中位大小为15毫米(四分位间距[IQR] 12 - 20),相比之下,346枚息肉通过CSP切除,中位大小为12毫米(IQR 10 - 15),P < 0.001。在HSP组中,15例患者出现术后并发症,包括11例有临床意义的出血、2例息肉切除术后综合征和2例腹痛。相比之下,CSP组无息肉切除术后并发症,P < 0.001。
在本研究中,CSP与任何息肉切除术后不良事件均无关联。对于切除10 - 20毫米大小的无蒂息肉,CSP似乎比HSP更安全。一项前瞻性多中心研究已经启动,以验证这些发现并评估CSP对这种大小息肉完全切除的疗效。