Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100081, PR China; College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, PR China.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100081, PR China.
Environ Pollut. 2020 Aug;263(Pt B):114408. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114408. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
Decision-making related to nitrogen (N) applications based solely on historic experience is still widespread in China, the country with the largest rice production and N fertilizer use. By connecting N application rates with target N uptake, indigenous N supply, and N loss estimates collected from 1078 on-farm experiments, we determined regional N application rates for five rice-based agroecosystems, including a quantification of the reduction potential of application rates when using low-loss N sources, such as organic N and slow-release N. Based on our results, the moderate regional N application rates were 165, 180, 160, 153, and 173 kg N ha for single, middle-CE (Central and Eastern China), middle-SW (Southwestern China), early, and late rice, respectively; lower (99-148 kg N ha) and upper (195-217 kg N ha) limits of N application rates were developed for situations with sufficient and insufficient indigenous N supplies, respectively. The depletion of soil N mineralization was quantified as 46.8-67.3 kg ha, and straw return is determined to be a robust measure to maintain soil N balance. Substituting manure or slow-release N for conventional N fertilizer significantly decreased N losses via NH volatilization, leaching, runoff, and NO emissions. Overall, we observed 7.2-11.3 percent point reductions of N loss rate for low-loss N sources when compared to conventional N applications. On average, total N application rates could be theoretically reduced by 27 kg N ha by using a slow-release N fertilizer, or by 30 kg N ha when using manure due to their effectiveness at decreasing system N losses. Greater productivity, sustainable soil fertility, and a lower risk of N pollution would result from the ideal N application rate coupled with appropriate management practices. Widespread adoption of using low-loss N sources could become a key solution for future reduction in environmental N pollution and agricultural N inputs.
在中国,基于历史经验来决定氮肥(N)的施用量仍然很普遍。中国是水稻产量和氮肥用量最大的国家。我们通过将施用量与目标氮吸收量、土壤中内源性氮供应和从 1078 个田间试验中收集的氮损失估算值联系起来,确定了五个基于水稻的农业生态系统的区域氮肥施用量,包括使用低氮损失源(如有机氮和缓释氮)时施用量减少的潜力。根据我们的结果,单季稻、中稻-东部(CE)、中稻-西南(SW)、早稻和晚稻的适度区域施氮量分别为 165、180、160、153 和 173 千克/公顷;在有足够和不足内源性氮供应的情况下,分别制定了氮施用量的较低(99-148 千克/公顷)和较高(195-217 千克/公顷)限制。量化了土壤氮矿化的消耗,为 46.8-67.3 千克/公顷,秸秆还田被确定为维持土壤氮平衡的有力措施。用有机肥或缓释氮肥替代常规氮肥,可显著减少氨挥发、淋失、径流和 NO 排放引起的氮损失。总体而言,与常规氮肥应用相比,低氮损失源的氮损失率降低了 7.2-11.3 个百分点。平均而言,通过使用缓释氮肥,理论上可以减少 27 千克/公顷的总氮施用量,或者通过使用有机肥减少 30 千克/公顷的总氮施用量,因为它们可以有效地减少系统氮损失。通过理想的氮肥施用量和适当的管理措施,将带来更高的生产力、可持续的土壤肥力和更低的氮污染风险。广泛采用低氮损失源可能成为未来减少环境氮污染和农业氮投入的关键解决方案。