• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

化肥投入全要素替代效率的驱动因素及相关环境调控政策:以浙江省为例。

Driving factors of total-factor substitution efficiency of chemical fertilizer input and related environmental regulation policy: A case study of Zhejiang Province.

机构信息

China Institute of Regulation Research, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Xueyuan Road 18, Hangzhou, 310018, China.

School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Yuhangtang Road 866, Hangzhou, 310058, China.

出版信息

Environ Pollut. 2020 Aug;263(Pt B):114541. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114541. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114541
PMID:32289649
Abstract

Based on the panel data of 63 counties of Zhejiang Province from 2003 to 2017, this paper studied the total-factor substitution efficiency of chemical fertilizer input and its spatial-temporal evolution by using the Super-efficiency DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis) model, locational Gini coefficient and Theil index. And the driving factors of the total-factor substitution efficiency of chemical fertilizer input were analyzed by constructing the Panel Tobit model. The results showed that: the comprehensive efficiency of total-factor substitution for chemical fertilizer input in Zhejiang Province is low, and technical efficiency is the main drive for promoting comprehensive efficiency; Gini coefficient is below the warning line of 0.4, and the difference of substitution efficiency, relatively small, mainly comes from the contribution within the region, and the difference ratio of contribution by the Southwestern Zhejiang is rapidly increasing. In detail, financial investment in agriculture serve as the greatest the driving force, and government chemical fertilizer input subsidies have a significantly negative effect. Therefore, we should improve the subsidy policy system, increase government investment in agricultural infrastructure, adjust the structure of agroindustry and improve the income of rural residents under the premise of reducing the fertilizer input intensity.

摘要

基于 2003-2017 年浙江省 63 个县的面板数据,运用超效率 DEA(数据包络分析)模型、区位基尼系数和泰尔指数,研究了化肥投入的全要素替代效率及其时空演变,并通过构建面板 Tobit 模型分析了化肥投入全要素替代效率的驱动因素。结果表明:浙江省化肥投入全要素替代综合效率较低,技术效率是推动综合效率的主要动力;基尼系数低于 0.4 的警戒线,替代效率的差异较小,主要来源于区域内的贡献,且浙西南地区的贡献差异比快速增加。具体而言,农业财政投入是最大的驱动力,政府化肥投入补贴则有显著的负向作用。因此,在降低化肥投入强度的前提下,我们应完善补贴政策体系,增加政府对农业基础设施的投资,调整农产业结构,提高农村居民收入。

相似文献

1
Driving factors of total-factor substitution efficiency of chemical fertilizer input and related environmental regulation policy: A case study of Zhejiang Province.化肥投入全要素替代效率的驱动因素及相关环境调控政策:以浙江省为例。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Aug;263(Pt B):114541. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114541. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
2
[Substitution efficiency of agro-chemical input intensity and its influence factors].[农用化学品投入强度替代效率及其影响因素]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Apr;30(4):1404-1414. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.035.
3
Will the substitution of capital for labor increase the use of chemical fertilizer in agriculture? Analysis based on provincial panel data in China.资本对劳动力的替代会增加农业中化肥的使用量吗?基于中国省级面板数据的分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(8):21052-21071. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23628-y. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
4
Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of fertilizer reduction control in Zhejiang Province.浙江省肥料减控的时空演变及驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:650-659. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.420. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
5
Spatial-temporal characteristics and driving factors of the chemical fertilizer supply/demand correlation network in China.中国化肥供需关联网络的时空特征及驱动因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(53):80532-80548. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21387-4. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
6
Effect of agricultural subsidies on the use of chemical fertilizer.农业补贴对化肥使用的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 1;299:113621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113621. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
7
[Regional difference of NPK fertilizers application and environmental risk assessment in Jiangsu Province, China].[中国江苏省氮磷钾肥料施用的区域差异及环境风险评估]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 May;26(5):1477-83.
8
Evaluating the Heterogeneity Effect of Fertilizer Use Intensity on Agricultural Eco-Efficiency in China: Evidence from a Panel Quantile Regression Model.评估肥料使用强度对中国农业生态效率的异质性影响:来自面板分位数回归模型的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 28;19(11):6612. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116612.
9
Effect of the grain-growing purpose and farm size on the ability of stable land property rights to encourage farmers to apply organic fertilizers.粮食种植目的和农场规模对稳定土地产权鼓励农民施用有机肥能力的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 1;251:109621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109621. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
10
Financial Support for Agriculture, Chemical Fertilizer Use, and Carbon Emissions from Agricultural Production in China.中国农业财政支持、化肥使用与农业生产碳排放
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 10;19(12):7155. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127155.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental regulations, green development of agriculture, and residents' health-empirical analysis of Yangtze River Economic Belt in China.环境法规、农业绿色发展与居民健康——中国长江经济带的实证分析。
PeerJ. 2023 Jul 26;11:e15717. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15717. eCollection 2023.
2
Impact of Agricultural Division of Labor on Fertilizer Reduction Application: Evidence from Western China.农业分工对化肥减施的影响——来自中国西部的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3787. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053787.
3
Are Socialized Services of Agricultural Green Production Conducive to the Reduction in Fertilizer Input? Empirical Evidence from Rural China.
农业绿色生产的社会化服务有利于减少化肥投入吗?来自中国农村的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22):14856. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214856.
4
Evaluating China Food's Fertilizer Reduction and Efficiency Initiative Using a Double Stochastic Meta-Frontier Method.运用双重随机前沿模型评估中国食品业的减量化和增效举措。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;19(12):7342. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127342.
5
Potential to Reduce Chemical Fertilizer Application in Tea Plantations at Various Spatial Scales.在不同空间尺度上减少茶园化肥施用的潜力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5243. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095243.
6
Evaluating Fertilizer Use Efficiency and Spatial Correlation of Its Determinants in China: A Geographically Weighted Regression Approach.评估中国肥料利用效率及其决定因素的空间相关性:一种地理加权回归方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 27;17(23):8830. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238830.