Aston University, Aston Pharmacy School, School of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
University of Stirling, School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7082. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7082.
To explore the use of artifacts and material objects in accessing what learning means to pharmacy students, what their learning practices are, and their assumptions about what it means to master the pharmacy curriculum. Data collection was qualitative and took the form of individual semi-structured interviews with students in a Master of Pharmacy program. Participants were asked to select three artifacts (a photograph, an object, a song, a picture, or something else) that represented what learning as a pharmacy student meant to them and bring them to the interview. The interviews were conducted using both the abstracts and a semi-structured interview plan constructed as a mind map. Flexibility was applied to changing the sequence of themes, and additional probing questions were asked. Data were analyzed thematically using mind mapping and, subsequently, theoretical constructs were applied to make sense of the analysis. Nineteen interviews were conducted. Findings were grouped into five distinct themes: study practices or strategies adopted, rituals associated with learning and studying, pharmacy knowledge, motivation for learning, and ways of learning. Each of these identified themes was summarized and illustrations from the data given. The affective dimensions of learning were a strong emergent theme throughout the data. The use of artifacts in the research process afforded in-depth insight into the specific study practices adopted by a group of pharmacy students. Qualitative methods can be useful in surfacing students' learning practices and difficulties faced in their negotiation of the pharmacy curriculum.
为了探索使用人工制品和实物来了解药学学生的学习意义、他们的学习实践以及他们对掌握药学课程的意义的假设。数据收集是定性的,采用了与药学硕士课程学生进行的个人半结构化访谈的形式。要求参与者从他们作为药学学生的学习意义中选择三件人工制品(照片、物品、歌曲、图片或其他物品)带到访谈中。访谈使用摘要和作为思维导图构建的半结构化访谈计划进行。灵活性适用于改变主题的顺序,并提出了额外的探究问题。使用思维导图对数据进行主题分析,然后应用理论结构来理解分析结果。进行了 19 次访谈。研究结果分为五个不同的主题:采用的学习实践或策略、与学习和研究相关的仪式、药学知识、学习动机和学习方式。这些已确定的主题中的每一个都进行了总结,并给出了数据中的说明。学习的情感维度是整个数据中一个强烈的突出主题。在研究过程中使用人工制品深入洞察了一组药学学生采用的特定学习实践。定性方法可用于揭示学生的学习实践以及他们在药学课程谈判中面临的困难。