• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定性研究的抽样

Sampling for qualitative research.

作者信息

Marshall M N

机构信息

Institute of General Practice, University of Exeter, Postgraduate Medical School, UK.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 1996 Dec;13(6):522-5. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
PMID:9023528
Abstract

The probability sampling techniques used for quantitative studies are rarely appropriate when conducting qualitative research. This article considers and explains the differences between the two approaches and describes three broad categories of naturalistic sampling: convenience, judgement and theoretical models. The principles are illustrated with practical examples from the author's own research.

摘要

在进行定性研究时,用于定量研究的概率抽样技术很少适用。本文思考并解释了这两种方法之间的差异,并描述了自然主义抽样的三大类:便利抽样、判断抽样和理论模型抽样。文中用作者自身研究中的实际例子对这些原则进行了说明。

相似文献

1
Sampling for qualitative research.定性研究的抽样
Fam Pract. 1996 Dec;13(6):522-5. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522.
2
The key informant technique.关键 informant 技术。
Fam Pract. 1996 Feb;13(1):92-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.1.92.
3
[The cooperation of general practitioner and practising specialist (author's transl)].全科医生与专科医生的合作(作者译)
Ther Umsch. 1975 Nov;32(11):703-6.
4
Desirable features of qualitative research.定性研究的理想特征。
Fam Pract Res J. 1994 Dec;14(4):369-78.
5
How can the principles of complexity science be applied to improve the coordination of care for complex pediatric patients?复杂性科学的原理如何应用于改善对复杂儿科患者的护理协调?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Apr;15(2):85-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014605.
6
Integrating methodologies in general practice research. Does it work?整合全科医学研究中的方法。它有效吗?
Aust Fam Physician. 1998 Jan;27 Suppl 1:S5-6.
7
Research on risk and risk in research: theoretical and practical experiences from a multidisciplinary study on cervical cancer screening in urban Sweden.研究中的风险与风险研究:瑞典城市宫颈癌筛查多学科研究的理论与实践经验
Qual Health Res. 1999 Jan;9(1):45-60. doi: 10.1177/104973299129121686.
8
Ideas and approaches towards strengthening the quantitative science for the interprofessional field.加强跨专业领域定量科学的思路与方法。
J Interprof Care. 2011 Jul;25(4):239-40. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.564458.
9
Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.混合方法实施研究中定性数据收集与分析的目的抽样法
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
10
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.

引用本文的文献

1
Advance care planning in the perioperative setting: a mixed methods study of anaesthetists' knowledge, attitudes and practice.围手术期的预先护理计划:一项关于麻醉医生的知识、态度和实践的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 28;15(8):e101642. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101642.
2
"Invisible wounds of childbirth"; women's experiences of obstetric violence: a phenomenological qualitative study.“分娩的无形创伤”;女性遭遇产科暴力的经历:一项现象学质性研究
Reprod Health. 2025 Aug 22;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02109-8.
3
The impact of vitreous floaters on quality of life: a qualitative study.
玻璃体混浊对生活质量的影响:一项定性研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Aug 18;9(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00934-w.
4
Exploring aspects of medical students' professional identity through their reflective expressions.通过医学生的反思性表达探索其职业身份的各个方面。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 25;25(1):1111. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07611-y.
5
Acceptability of a personalised single-session feedback intervention for eating disorders: a qualitative content analysis.个性化单节反馈干预对饮食失调症的可接受性:一项定性内容分析
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jul 10;13(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01333-8.
6
Understanding physical activity participation among underserved women: a mixed-methods cross sectional study using an ecological framework.了解弱势群体中女性的体育活动参与情况:一项采用生态框架的混合方法横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2178. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23189-y.
7
Insights Into the Current and Future State of AI Adoption Within Health Systems in Southeast Asia: Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study.东南亚卫生系统中人工智能应用的现状与未来洞察:横断面定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 16;27:e71591. doi: 10.2196/71591.
8
"All things equal": ethical principles governing why autonomous vehicle experts change or retain their opinions in trolley problems-a qualitative study.“在其他条件相同的情况下”:关于自动驾驶汽车专家在电车难题中改变或保留其观点的伦理原则——一项定性研究
Front Robot AI. 2025 May 27;12:1544272. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1544272. eCollection 2025.
9
Structural barriers to sexual and reproductive health care among Black and Latina cisgender and transgender U.S. women who use drugs: a qualitative study.美国使用毒品的黑人及拉丁裔顺性别和跨性别女性在性与生殖健康护理方面面临的结构性障碍:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 27;25(1):754. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12910-7.
10
Ecological Momentary Assessment in Eating Disorders Research: A Qualitative Examination of Participant Experience and Recommendations for Future Studies.饮食失调研究中的生态瞬时评估:对参与者体验的定性考察及对未来研究的建议
Int J Eat Disord. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1002/eat.24473.