• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症患者复苏的特征以及液体反应性动态测试的使用与预后之间的关联:阿根廷一项多中心前瞻性队列研究的结果

Characteristics of resuscitation, and association between use of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness and outcomes in septic patients: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study in Argentina.

作者信息

Dubin Arnaldo, Loudet Cecilia, Kanoore Edul Vanina S, Osatnik Javier, Ríos Fernando, Vásquez Daniela, Pozo Mario, Lattanzio Bernardo, Pálizas Fernando, Klein Francisco, Piezny Damián, Rubatto Birri Paolo N, Tuhay Graciela, García Analía, Santamaría Analía, Zakalik Graciela, González Cecilia, Estenssoro Elisa

机构信息

Servicio de Terapia Intensiva, Sanatorio Otamendi, Azcuénaga 870, C1115 AAB, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Hospital Interzonal de Agudos San Martin de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Apr 15;10(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00659-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13613-020-00659-7
PMID:32297028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7158970/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resuscitation of septic patients regarding goals, monitoring aspects and therapy is highly variable. Our aim was to characterize cardiovascular and fluid management of sepsis in Argentina, a low and middle-income country (LMIC). Furthermore, we sought to test whether the utilization of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness, as a guide for fluid therapy after initial resuscitation in patients with persistent or recurrent hypoperfusion, was associated with decreased mortality.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of a national, multicenter prospective cohort study (n = 787) fulfilling Sepsis-3 definitions. Epidemiological characteristics, hemodynamic management data, type of fluids and vasopressors administered, physiological variables denoting hypoperfusion, use of tests of fluid responsiveness, and outcomes, were registered. Independent predictors of mortality were identified with logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Initially, 584 of 787 patients (74%) had mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mm Hg and/or signs of hypoperfusion and received 30 mL/kg of fluids, mostly normal saline (53%) and Ringer lactate (35%). Vasopressors and/or inotropes were administered in 514 (65%) patients, mainly norepinephrine (100%) and dobutamine (9%); in 22%, vasopressors were administered before ending the fluid load. After this, 413 patients (53%) presented persisting or recurrent hypotension and/or hypoperfusion, which prompted administration of additional fluid, based on: lactate levels (66%), urine output (62%), heart rate (54%), central venous O saturation (39%), central venous-arterial PCO difference (38%), MAP (31%), dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness (30%), capillary-refill time (28%), mottling (26%), central venous pressure (24%), cardiac index (13%) and/or pulmonary wedge pressure (3%). Independent predictors of mortality were SOFA and Charlson scores, lactate, requirement of mechanical ventilation, and utilization of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective observational study assessing the characteristics of resuscitation of septic patients in Argentina, a LMIC, the prevalent use of initial fluid bolus with normal saline and Ringer lactate and the use of norepinephrine as the most frequent vasopressor, reflect current worldwide practices. After initial resuscitation with 30 mL/kg of fluids and vasopressors, 413 patients developed persistent or recurrent hypoperfusion, which required further volume expansion. In this setting, the assessment of fluid responsiveness with dynamic tests to guide fluid resuscitation was independently associated with decreased mortality.

摘要

背景

脓毒症患者在复苏目标、监测方面和治疗上存在很大差异。我们的目的是描述阿根廷这个低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)脓毒症患者的心血管和液体管理情况。此外,我们试图检验在持续性或复发性低灌注患者初始复苏后,使用液体反应性动态测试作为液体治疗的指导是否与死亡率降低相关。

方法

对一项符合脓毒症-3定义的全国性、多中心前瞻性队列研究(n = 787)进行二次分析。记录流行病学特征、血流动力学管理数据、给予的液体和血管加压药类型、表示低灌注的生理变量、液体反应性测试的使用情况以及结局。通过逻辑回归分析确定死亡率的独立预测因素。

结果

最初,787例患者中有584例(74%)平均动脉压(MAP)< 65 mmHg和/或有低灌注体征,接受了30 mL/kg的液体,大部分为生理盐水(53%)和乳酸林格液(35%)。514例(65%)患者使用了血管加压药和/或正性肌力药,主要是去甲肾上腺素(100%)和多巴酚丁胺(9%);22%的患者在液体负荷结束前就使用了血管加压药。此后,413例患者(53%)出现持续性或复发性低血压和/或低灌注,这促使根据以下因素给予额外液体:乳酸水平(66%)、尿量(62%)、心率(54%)、中心静脉血氧饱和度(39%)、中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差(38%)、MAP(31%)、液体反应性动态测试(30%)、毛细血管再充盈时间(28%)、皮肤花斑(26%)、中心静脉压(24%)、心脏指数(13%)和/或肺楔压(3%)。死亡率的独立预测因素是序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和Charlson评分、乳酸、机械通气需求以及液体反应性动态测试的使用情况。

结论

在这项评估阿根廷这个低收入和中等收入国家脓毒症患者复苏特征的前瞻性观察性研究中,普遍使用生理盐水和乳酸林格液进行初始液体推注以及最常使用去甲肾上腺素作为血管加压药,反映了当前的全球实践。在使用30 mL/kg液体和血管加压药进行初始复苏后,413例患者出现持续性或复发性低灌注,这需要进一步扩容。在这种情况下,使用动态测试评估液体反应性以指导液体复苏与死亡率降低独立相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a76/7158970/ba6d445e5288/13613_2020_659_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a76/7158970/379c5f8d7391/13613_2020_659_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a76/7158970/ba6d445e5288/13613_2020_659_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a76/7158970/379c5f8d7391/13613_2020_659_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a76/7158970/ba6d445e5288/13613_2020_659_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Characteristics of resuscitation, and association between use of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness and outcomes in septic patients: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study in Argentina.脓毒症患者复苏的特征以及液体反应性动态测试的使用与预后之间的关联:阿根廷一项多中心前瞻性队列研究的结果
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Apr 15;10(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00659-7.
2
Hypoperfusion context as a predictor of 28-d all-cause mortality in septic shock patients: A comparative observational study.低灌注情况作为脓毒性休克患者28天全因死亡率的预测指标:一项比较性观察研究。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Jun 6;11(16):3765-3779. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i16.3765.
3
Hemodynamic Assessment and Support in Sepsis and Septic Shock in Resource-Limited Settings资源有限环境下脓毒症和脓毒性休克的血流动力学评估与支持
4
Fluid Therapy for Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis: A Review.严重脓毒症成人的液体治疗:综述。
JAMA. 2023 Jun 13;329(22):1967-1980. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7560.
5
Haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings.资源有限环境下脓毒症和脓毒性休克的血流动力学评估与支持
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Nov 1;111(11):483-489. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try007.
6
Capillary refill time response to a fluid challenge or a vasopressor test: an observational, proof-of-concept study.毛细血管再充盈时间对液体冲击或血管加压药试验的反应:一项观察性概念验证研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Apr 1;14(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01275-5.
7
[Adequate fluid resuscitation in septic shock with high catecholamine doses].[高剂量儿茶酚胺治疗脓毒性休克时的充分液体复苏]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2016 Sep;111(6):514-24. doi: 10.1007/s00063-015-0111-2. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
8
Prognosis of patients excluded by the definition of septic shock based on their lactate levels after initial fluid resuscitation: a prospective multi-center observational study.基于初始液体复苏后乳酸水平对脓毒性休克定义排除的患者的预后:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Feb 24;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1935-3.
9
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
10
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准:用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining the physiological bounds of left ventricular ejection time with a wireless, wearable ultrasound: An analysis of over 137,000 cardiac cycles.利用无线可穿戴超声设备界定左心室射血时间的生理范围:对超过137,000个心动周期的分析。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 17;11:20552076251323838. doi: 10.1177/20552076251323838. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Management of adult sepsis in resource-limited settings: global expert consensus statements using a Delphi method.资源有限环境下成人脓毒症的管理:采用德尔菲法的全球专家共识声明
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):21-38. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07735-7. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Resuscitation Guided by Volume Responsiveness Does Not Reduce Mortality in Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis.容量反应性指导下的复苏不能降低脓毒症死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
Crit Care Explor. 2019 May 23;1(5):e0015. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000015. eCollection 2019 May.
2
Systematic assessment of fluid responsiveness during early septic shock resuscitation: secondary analysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial.早期脓毒性休克复苏期间液体反应性的系统评估:ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 试验的二次分析。
Crit Care. 2020 Jan 23;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2732-y.
3
How to detect a positive response to a fluid bolus when cardiac output is not measured?
The correlation between carotid artery Doppler and stroke volume during central blood volume loss and resuscitation.
中心血容量丢失及复苏过程中颈动脉多普勒与每搏输出量之间的相关性
Acute Crit Care. 2024 Feb;39(1):162-168. doi: 10.4266/acc.2023.01095. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
4
The left ventricular outflow tract and carotid artery velocity time integrals.左心室流出道及颈动脉速度时间积分。
Front Med Technol. 2024 Jan 24;6:1320810. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1320810. eCollection 2024.
5
Inferior Vena Caval Measures Do Not Correlate with Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time Change Measured Using a Wireless Doppler Patch in Healthy Volunteers.在健康志愿者中,下腔静脉测量值与使用无线多普勒贴片测量的颈动脉校正血流时间变化不相关。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 3;13(23):3591. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13233591.
6
Performance of Tools and Measures to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Pediatric Shock and Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.工具和措施在预测儿童休克和危重症液体反应性方面的表现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;25(1):24-36. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003320. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
7
Effective hemodynamic monitoring.有效的血流动力学监测。
Crit Care. 2022 Sep 28;26(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04173-z.
8
Effect of a tailored sepsis treatment protocol on patient outcomes in the Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia: results of an interrupted time series analysis.埃塞俄比亚提克里安贝萨专科医院个体化脓毒症治疗方案对患者结局的影响:一项中断时间序列分析结果。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jul 19;17(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01221-8.
9
Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?液体反应性的预测。有什么新进展?
Ann Intensive Care. 2022 May 28;12(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8.
10
Assessing Fluid Intolerance with Doppler Ultrasonography: A Physiological Framework.评估多普勒超声检查中的液体不耐受:生理框架。
Med Sci (Basel). 2022 Feb 9;10(1):12. doi: 10.3390/medsci10010012.
在未测量心输出量的情况下,如何检测对液体冲击试验的阳性反应?
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Dec 16;9(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0612-x.
4
Evaluation and Predictors of Fluid Resuscitation in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者液体复苏的评估和预测因素。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1582-1590. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003960.
5
Health inequities in the diagnosis and outcome of sepsis in Argentina: a prospective cohort study.阿根廷脓毒症诊断与转归中的健康不平等:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2019 Jul 9;23(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2522-6.
6
[Clinical value of early liquid resuscitation guided by passive leg-raising test combined with transthoracic echocardiography in patients with septic shock].被动抬腿试验联合经胸超声心动图指导下早期液体复苏在感染性休克患者中的临床价值
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Apr;31(4):413-417. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.04.008.
7
The Restrictive IV Fluid Trial in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock (RIFTS): A Randomized Pilot Study.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的限制液体复苏试验(RIFTS):一项随机初步研究。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;47(7):951-959. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003779.
8
Narrative review: clinical assessment of peripheral tissue perfusion in septic shock.叙述性综述:脓毒性休克时外周组织灌注的临床评估
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Mar 13;9(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0511-1.
9
Adherence to fluid resuscitation guidelines and outcomes in patients with septic shock: Reassessing the "one-size-fits-all" approach.在感染性休克患者中,液体复苏指南的遵循与结局:重新评估“一刀切”的方法。
J Crit Care. 2019 Jun;51:94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
10
Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial.以外周灌注状态为目标的复苏策略与血清乳酸水平对感染性休克患者 28 天死亡率的影响:ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):654-664. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0071.