• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较中重度类风湿关节炎 JAK 抑制剂的疗效:网络荟萃分析。

Comparative Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors for Moderate-To-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.

AbbVie, Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):2356-2372. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01303-3. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1007/s12325-020-01303-3
PMID:32297280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7467453/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a class of targeted therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with established clinical efficacy. However, little is known about their efficacy compared with each other. This network meta-analysis (NMA) estimated the comparative efficacy of JAK inhibitors currently approved for RA.

METHODS

A targeted literature review was conducted for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of three approved JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib) as monotherapy or combination therapy among patients with moderate-to-severe RA who had inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD-IR). Using Bayesian NMA, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 responses and clinical remission (defined as DAS28-CRP < 2.6) were evaluated separately at 12 and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs were identified and included in the NMA. All JAK inhibitors demonstrated significantly better efficacy than csDMARD. Among combination therapies, upadacitinib 15 mg had the highest 12-week ACR50 responses (median [95% credible interval]: 43.4% [33.4%, 54.5%]), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg (38.7% [28.6%, 49.8%]), baricitinib 2 mg (37.1% [25.0%, 50.6%]), and baricitinib 4 mg (36.7%, [27.2%, 47.0%]). Similar results were observed for ACR20/70 and at week 24. Upadacitinib 15 mg + csDMARD was also found to have the highest clinical remission rates at week 12 (29.8% [16.9%, 47.0%]), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg (24.3%, [12.7%, 40.2%]), baricitinib 4 mg (22.8%, [11.8%, 37.5%]), and baricitinib 2 mg (20.1%, [8.6%, 37.4%]). Similar results were seen at week 24. Among monotherapies, upadacitinib had a higher ACR50 response (38.5% [25.3%, 53.2%]) than tofacitinib (30.4% [18.3%, 45.5%]). The differences in efficacy measures were not statistically significant between the JAK inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

The NMA found that upadacitinib 15 mg once daily had numerically higher efficacy in terms of ACR response and clinical remission among approved JAK combination therapies and monotherapies for csDMARD-IR patients with RA.

摘要

简介

Janus 激酶 (JAK) 抑制剂是一类针对类风湿关节炎 (RA) 的靶向治疗药物,具有明确的临床疗效。然而,目前对于这些药物之间的疗效比较知之甚少。本项网状荟萃分析(NMA)旨在评估目前已获批用于治疗对常规合成疾病修饰抗风湿药物 (csDMARD-IR) 反应不足的中重度 RA 患者的三种 JAK 抑制剂(托法替布、巴瑞替尼和乌帕替尼)的疗效。采用贝叶斯 NMA,分别在 12 周和 24 周评估美国风湿病学会 (ACR) 20/50/70 缓解和临床缓解(定义为 DAS28-CRP < 2.6)作为单药或联合治疗的疗效。

方法

针对评估三种获批 JAK 抑制剂(托法替布、巴瑞替尼和乌帕替尼)作为单药或联合治疗对 csDMARD-IR 患者疗效的 III 期随机对照试验(RCT)进行了有针对性的文献回顾。这些 RCT 纳入了中重度 RA 患者,这些患者对 csDMARD 反应不足。采用贝叶斯 NMA,分别在 12 周和 24 周评估美国风湿病学会(ACR)20/50/70 缓解和临床缓解(定义为 DAS28-CRP < 2.6)作为单药或联合治疗的疗效。

结果

共确定了 11 项 RCT 并纳入了 NMA。所有 JAK 抑制剂均显示出优于 csDMARD 的显著疗效。在联合治疗中,乌帕替尼 15mg 在 12 周时具有最高的 ACR50 缓解率(中位数 [95%可信区间]:43.4% [33.4%,54.5%]),其次是托法替布 5mg(38.7% [28.6%,49.8%])、巴瑞替尼 2mg(37.1% [25.0%,50.6%])和巴瑞替尼 4mg(36.7% [27.2%,47.0%])。在 ACR20/70 和 24 周时也观察到类似的结果。在 12 周时,乌帕替尼 15mg+csDMARD 还具有最高的临床缓解率(29.8% [16.9%,47.0%]),其次是托法替布 5mg(24.3% [12.7%,40.2%])、巴瑞替尼 4mg(22.8% [11.8%,37.5%])和巴瑞替尼 2mg(20.1% [8.6%,37.4%])。在 24 周时也观察到类似的结果。在单药治疗中,乌帕替尼的 ACR50 缓解率(38.5% [25.3%,53.2%])高于托法替布(30.4% [18.3%,45.5%])。这些 JAK 抑制剂之间的疗效差异无统计学意义。

结论

本 NMA 发现,乌帕替尼 15mg 每日一次在获批用于治疗 csDMARD-IR 患者的 JAK 联合治疗和单药治疗中,在 ACR 缓解和临床缓解方面具有更高的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f2/7467453/48999ea36b64/12325_2020_1303_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f2/7467453/771b53a43c7b/12325_2020_1303_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f2/7467453/2f192f15756d/12325_2020_1303_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f2/7467453/00324f77d0af/12325_2020_1303_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f2/7467453/7e6dadaf576c/12325_2020_1303_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f2/7467453/48999ea36b64/12325_2020_1303_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f2/7467453/771b53a43c7b/12325_2020_1303_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f2/7467453/2f192f15756d/12325_2020_1303_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f2/7467453/00324f77d0af/12325_2020_1303_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f2/7467453/7e6dadaf576c/12325_2020_1303_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f2/7467453/48999ea36b64/12325_2020_1303_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors for Moderate-To-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.比较中重度类风湿关节炎 JAK 抑制剂的疗效:网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):2356-2372. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01303-3. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy for active rheumatoid arthritis.托法替布、巴瑞替尼、乌帕替尼、费卢替尼和培非替尼单药治疗活动性类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性比较。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Aug;45(4):674-681. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13142. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
Relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in comparison to adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.托法替布、巴瑞替尼、乌帕替尼和非戈替尼与阿达木单抗相比在活动性类风湿关节炎患者中的相对疗效和安全性。
Z Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;79(8):785-796. doi: 10.1007/s00393-020-00750-1.
4
Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib versus methotrexate for disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis.比较托法替布、巴瑞替尼、乌帕替尼和氟可替尼与甲氨蝶呤在类风湿关节炎初治患者中的疗效和安全性。
Z Rheumatol. 2021 Nov;80(9):889-898. doi: 10.1007/s00393-020-00889-x. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
5
The efficacy and safety of different Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.不同 Janus 激酶抑制剂单药治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性:一项贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0305621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305621. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.比较托法替布、巴瑞替尼、乌帕替尼和菲卓替尼治疗生物制剂难治性活动性类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性。
Z Rheumatol. 2021 May;80(4):379-392. doi: 10.1007/s00393-020-00796-1.
7
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较托法替布和乌帕替尼在活动性类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性:一项基于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Aug;22(8):1563-1571. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13616. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
8
Relative remission rates of Janus kinase inhibitors in comparison with adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis.与阿达木单抗相比,Janus 激酶抑制剂治疗活动性类风湿关节炎患者的相对缓解率:一项网络荟萃分析。
Z Rheumatol. 2024 Feb;83(Suppl 1):88-96. doi: 10.1007/s00393-022-01165-w. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
9
Relative Remission and Low Disease Activity Rates of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib, and Filgotinib versus Methotrexate in Patients with Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug-Naive Rheumatoid Arthritis.在初治的类风湿关节炎患者中,与甲氨蝶呤相比,托法替布、巴瑞替尼、乌帕替尼和菲诺替尼的缓解率和低疾病活动率相对较高。
Pharmacology. 2023;108(6):589-598. doi: 10.1159/000527186. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
10
Comparative efficacy of five approved Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.五种已获批的 Janus 激酶抑制剂作为单药治疗及联合治疗中重度活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 24;15:1387585. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1387585. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
An Analysis of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, Other Adverse Events, and Efficacy in Patients with Rheumatic Disease Receiving Targeted Therapy: Experience from a Third-Level Hospital.接受靶向治疗的风湿性疾病患者的主要不良心血管事件、其他不良事件及疗效分析:来自一家三级医院的经验
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 2;14(13):4693. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134693.
2
Comparison of anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic effects of JAK inhibitors in IL-6 and TNFα-stimulated fibroblast-like synoviocytes derived from patients with RA.JAK抑制剂对类风湿关节炎患者来源的IL-6和TNFα刺激的成纤维样滑膜细胞的抗炎和抗血管生成作用比较。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 21;15(1):9736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94894-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Upadacitinib Versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.乌帕替尼治疗甲氨蝶呤应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者的 III 期、双盲、随机对照研究结果。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;71(11):1788-1800. doi: 10.1002/art.41032. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
2
Upadacitinib as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate (SELECT-MONOTHERAPY): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 study.乌帕替尼单药治疗对甲氨蝶呤应答不足的活动性类风湿关节炎患者(SELECT-MONOTHERAPY):一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲 3 期研究。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 8;393(10188):2303-2311. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30419-2. Epub 2019 May 23.
3
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of JAK Inhibitors in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.
JAK抑制剂治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效与安全性比较:网状Meta分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jan 28;18(2):178. doi: 10.3390/ph18020178.
4
Switching to biological DMARDs versus cycling among JAK inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and with inadequate response to JAK inhibitors: from FIRST registry.类风湿关节炎患者对JAK抑制剂反应不足时,从JAK抑制剂间循环用药转换为使用生物改善病情抗风湿药:来自FIRST注册研究
RMD Open. 2025 Jan 21;11(1):e004987. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004987.
5
Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes and treatment continuation in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving non-TNF-targeted therapies.肥胖对接受非肿瘤坏死因子靶向治疗的类风湿关节炎患者临床结局及治疗持续性的影响。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Dec 23;16:1759720X241308027. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241308027. eCollection 2024.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Upadacitinib vs. Tofacitinib for moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis in China.在中国,乌帕替尼与托法替布治疗中重度类风湿关节炎的成本效益分析
Immunotherapy. 2024;16(18-19):1141-1151. doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2024.2426972. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
7
Comparative efficacy of five approved Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.五种已获批的 Janus 激酶抑制剂作为单药治疗及联合治疗中重度活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 24;15:1387585. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1387585. eCollection 2024.
8
Impact of upadacitinib on the risk of digestive events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.乌帕替尼对类风湿关节炎患者消化事件风险的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 4;9(6):e17002. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17002. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Importance of Time-integrated Cumulative Parameters for Radiographic Progression Prediction of Rheumatoid Arthritis.时间积分累积参数对类风湿关节炎影像学进展预测的重要性
J Rheum Dis. 2022 Jul 1;29(3):129-131. doi: 10.4078/jrd.2022.29.3.129.
10
Efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis.Janus 激酶抑制剂在类风湿关节炎中的疗效。
Inflamm Res. 2023 May;72(5):1121-1132. doi: 10.1007/s00011-023-01717-z. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
Peficitinib: First Global Approval.培非替尼:全球首次获批。
Drugs. 2019 Jun;79(8):887-891. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01131-y.
4
In vitro and in vivo characterization of the JAK1 selectivity of upadacitinib (ABT-494).乌帕替尼(ABT-494)对JAK1选择性的体外和体内特性研究
BMC Rheumatol. 2018 Aug 28;2:23. doi: 10.1186/s41927-018-0031-x. eCollection 2018.
5
Treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis - are we there yet?类风湿关节炎的达标治疗——我们做到了吗?
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019 Mar;15(3):180-186. doi: 10.1038/s41584-019-0170-5.
6
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.托法替布与巴瑞替尼治疗活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Z Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;78(6):559-567. doi: 10.1007/s00393-018-0531-5.
7
Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.乌帕替尼治疗对常规合成改善病情抗风湿药物应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者的安全性和疗效(SELECT-NEXT):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2503-2512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31115-2. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
8
JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases.JAK抑制作为免疫和炎症性疾病的一种治疗策略。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):78. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.267.
9
Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib with methotrexate, and adalimumab with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ORAL Strategy): a phase 3b/4, double-blind, head-to-head, randomised controlled trial.托法替布单药治疗、托法替布联合甲氨蝶呤与阿达木单抗联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性(ORAL Strategy):一项 IIIb/IV 期、双盲、头对头、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 29;390(10093):457-468. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31618-5. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
10
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update.EULAR 推荐的类风湿关节炎治疗策略:2016 年更新版
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):960-977. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715. Epub 2017 Mar 6.