School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.
J Chem Inf Model. 2020 Jun 22;60(6):3131-3144. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00217. Epub 2020 May 13.
Preorganization of large, directionally oriented, electric fields inside protein active sites has been proposed as a crucial contributor to catalytic mechanism in many enzymes, and it may be efficiently investigated at the atomistic level with molecular dynamics simulations. Here, we evaluate the ability of the AMOEBA polarizable force field, as well as the additive Amber ff14SB and Charmm C36m models, to describe the electric fields present inside the active site of the peptidyl-prolyl isomerase cyclophilin A. We compare the molecular mechanical electric fields to those calculated with a fully first-principles quantum mechanical (QM) representation of the protein, solvent, and ions, and find that AMOEBA consistently shows far greater correlation with the QM electric fields than either of the additive force fields tested. Catalytically relevant fields calculated with AMOEBA were typically smaller than those observed with additive potentials, but were generally consistent with an electrostatically driven mechanism for catalysis. Our results highlight the accuracy and the potential advantages of using polarizable force fields in systems where accurate electrostatics may be crucial for providing mechanistic insights.
在许多酶中,蛋白质活性部位内的大、定向的电场的预先组织被认为是催化机制的关键贡献者,并且可以通过分子动力学模拟在原子水平上有效地研究。在这里,我们评估了 AMOEBA 极化力场以及附加的 Amber ff14SB 和 Charmm C36m 模型,以描述肽基脯氨酰异构酶 cyclophilin A 活性部位内存在的电场。我们将分子力学电场与使用蛋白质、溶剂和离子的完全第一性原理量子力学(QM)表示计算的电场进行比较,发现 AMOEBA 与 QM 电场的相关性始终远大于测试的任何附加力场。用 AMOEBA 计算的与催化相关的场通常小于用附加势观察到的场,但通常与催化的静电驱动机制一致。我们的结果突出了在准确的静电学可能对提供机制见解至关重要的系统中使用极化力场的准确性和潜在优势。