Paes de Andrade Fabienne Louise Juvêncio, Jerez-Roig Javier, Belém Louise Natália Mesquita, de Lima Kenio Costa
Postgraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal-RN, Brazil.
Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare. Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Spain.
J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2019 Jun 1;4(2):51-60. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-04-051. eCollection 2019 Jun.
Verify the prevalence of frailty and its associated factors in institutionalized older people.
Cross-sectional study carried out in 10 nursing homes in Natal (Brazil), between October/2013 and January/2014. All institutionalized older people 60+ that were not hospitalized, in terminal state, coma or under palliative care were included in the study. The dependent variable of the study was the presence/absence of frailty, classified according to the following criteria: severe cognitive decline and/or impossibility of independent walking or being bedridden. The 5 criteria (muscular weakness, unintentional weight loss, low physical activity level, slowness and exhaustion) of Fried et al. were considered for those with preserved cognitive and walking capacity. The chi-square test or Fisher's test and logistic regression were used for bivariate and multiple analysis, respectively. Sociodemographic, institution-related and health-related variables were also included.
Of the 321 participating older people, 80.1% were considered frail, 16.8% pre-frail and 3.1% non-frail. The final model demonstrated association of frailty with age (OR=2.67; 95%CI 1.39-5.14; p=0.003), presence of chronic diseases (OR=10.27; 95%CI 3.42-30.90; p<0.001), systemic arterial hypertension (OR=0.11; 95%CI 0.05-0.27; p<0.001) and institutionalization due to lack of caregiver (OR=2.55; 95%CI 1.36-4.76; p=0.003) adjusted by sex and type of institution.
Frailty was highly prevalent in institutionalized older people and its association with multi-factor aspects suggested that action of health services and government representations could aid in the prevention or delay of frailty onset, improving the life quality of older people.
核实机构养老老年人中衰弱的患病率及其相关因素。
于2013年10月至2014年1月在巴西纳塔尔的10家养老院开展横断面研究。研究纳入了所有60岁及以上、未住院、非终末期、非昏迷且未接受姑息治疗的机构养老老年人。研究的因变量为衰弱的存在与否,根据以下标准分类:严重认知衰退和/或无法独立行走或卧床不起。对于认知和行走能力保留的老年人,考虑采用Fried等人的5项标准(肌肉无力、非故意体重减轻、低体力活动水平、行动迟缓及疲惫)。分别采用卡方检验或Fisher检验以及逻辑回归进行双变量分析和多变量分析。还纳入了社会人口学、机构相关及健康相关变量。
在321名参与研究的老年人中,80.1%被认为衰弱,16.8%为衰弱前期,3.1%为非衰弱。最终模型显示,经性别和机构类型调整后,衰弱与年龄(比值比[OR]=2.67;95%置信区间[CI] 1.39 - 5.14;p=0.003)、慢性病的存在(OR=10.27;95%CI 3.42 - 30.90;p<0.001)、系统性动脉高血压(OR=0.11;95%CI 0.05 - 0.27;p<0.001)以及因缺乏照料者而入住机构(OR=2.55;95%CI 1.36 - 4.76;p=0.003)相关。
衰弱在机构养老老年人中高度流行,其与多因素方面的关联表明,卫生服务机构和政府部门的行动有助于预防或延缓衰弱的发生,提高老年人的生活质量。