• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰患者和护士个体化护理量表的心理测量学验证研究。

The Dutch Individualised Care Scale for patients and nurses - a psychometric validation study.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care - University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Mar;35(1):308-318. doi: 10.1111/scs.12853. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1111/scs.12853
PMID:32301170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7984034/
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Translating and psychometrically assessing the Individualised Care Scale (ICS) for patients and nurses for the Flemish and Dutch healthcare context.

BACKGROUND

Individualised care interventions have positive effects on health outcomes. However, there are no valid and reliable instruments for evaluating individualised care for the Flemish and Dutch healthcare context.

DESIGN

Psychometric validation study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

In Flemish hospitals, data were collected between February and June 2016, and in Dutch hospitals, data were collected between December 2014 and May 2015. Nurses with direct patient contact and a working experience of minimum 6 months on the wards could participate. Patient inclusion criteria were being an adult, being mentally competent, having an expected hospital stay of minimum 1 day, and being able to speak and read the Dutch language. In total, 845 patients and 569 nurses were included.

METHODS

The ICS was translated into Dutch using a forward-backward translation process. Minimal linguistic adaptations to the Dutch ICS were made to use the scale as a Flemish equivalent. Omega, Cronbach's Alpha, mean inter-item correlations and standardised subscale correlations established the reliability and confirmatory factor analysis the construct validity of the ICS.

RESULTS

Internal consistency using Omega (Cronbach's Alpha) ranged from 0.83 to 0.96 (0.82-0.95) for the ICS-Nurse and from 0.88 to 0.96 (0.87-0.96) for the ICS-Patient. Fit indices of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good model fit, except for the root mean square error of approximation, which indicated only moderate model fit.

CONCLUSION

The Dutch version of the ICS showed acceptable psychometric performance, supporting its use for the Dutch and Flemish healthcare context.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Knowledge of nurses' and patients' perceptions on individualised care will aid to target areas in the Dutch and Flemish healthcare context in which work needs to be undertaken to provide individualised nursing care.

摘要

目的和目标

将个体化护理量表(ICS)翻译并进行心理计量学评估,适用于 Flemish 和荷兰医疗保健环境中的患者和护士。

背景

个体化护理干预对健康结果有积极影响。然而, Flemish 和荷兰医疗保健环境中还没有用于评估个体化护理的有效且可靠的工具。

设计

心理计量验证研究。

地点和参与者

在 Flemish 医院,数据收集于 2016 年 2 月至 6 月之间,在荷兰医院,数据收集于 2014 年 12 月至 2015 年 5 月之间。具有直接患者接触且在病房工作经验至少 6 个月的护士可以参与。患者纳入标准为成年、精神健全、预计住院时间至少 1 天,并且能够说和阅读荷兰语。共有 845 名患者和 569 名护士参与。

方法

ICS 使用前后翻译过程被翻译成荷兰语。对荷兰 ICS 进行了最小的语言调整,使其成为 Flemish 的等效物。omega、Cronbach's Alpha、平均项目间相关性和标准化子量表相关性建立了 ICS 的可靠性和验证性因素分析的结构效度。

结果

使用 omega(Cronbach's Alpha)的内部一致性范围为 ICS-Nurse 从 0.83 到 0.96(0.82-0.95),ICS-Patient 从 0.88 到 0.96(0.87-0.96)。验证性因素分析的拟合指数表明模型拟合良好,除了均方根误差接近,这表明仅具有适度的模型拟合。

结论

ICS 的荷兰语版本表现出可接受的心理计量性能,支持其在荷兰和 Flemish 医疗保健环境中的使用。

临床实践意义

了解护士和患者对个体化护理的看法将有助于确定荷兰和 Flemish 医疗保健环境中需要开展工作的领域,以提供个体化护理。

相似文献

1
The Dutch Individualised Care Scale for patients and nurses - a psychometric validation study.荷兰患者和护士个体化护理量表的心理测量学验证研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Mar;35(1):308-318. doi: 10.1111/scs.12853. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
2
Individualised care in Flemish and Dutch hospitals: Comparing patients' and nurses' perceptions.个体化护理在佛兰芒语和荷兰语医院中的实践:比较患者和护士的感知。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2022 Sep;36(3):635-649. doi: 10.1111/scs.13016. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
Individualised Care Scale-Nurse: Construct validity and internal consistency of the Spanish version.个性化护理量表-护士版:西班牙语版本的结构效度和内部一致性
Scand J Caring Sci. 2022 Jun;36(2):404-415. doi: 10.1111/scs.13051. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
4
Validation of the Dutch-language version of Nurses' Moral Courage Scale.验证荷兰语版护士道德勇气量表。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Aug;28(5):809-822. doi: 10.1177/0969733020981754. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
5
Structural validity and construct validity of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS physical function-upper extremity version 2.0 item bank in Dutch patients with upper extremity injuries.荷兰-佛兰德 PROMIS 上肢功能 2.0 版本简体中文版条目库在荷兰上肢损伤患者中的结构效度和建构效度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Apr;43(8):1176-1184. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1651908. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
6
Nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards aged sexuality: validity and internal consistency of the Dutch version of the Aging Sexual Knowledge and Attitudes Scale.护士对老年人性行为的知识和态度:荷兰版老龄化性知识和态度量表的效度和内部一致性。
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Nov;69(11):2584-96. doi: 10.1111/jan.12113. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Gratitude at Work Scale in Employed Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.工作感恩量表中文版在在职护士中的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
J Nurs Res. 2024 Aug 1;32(4):e336. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000620.
8
Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Problems and Needs in Palliative Care questionnaire-short version in advanced cancer patients.中文版晚期癌症患者舒缓护理问题和需求问卷简表的心理计量学评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 6;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0450-5.
9
Validation and psychometric evaluation of the Dutch person-centred care of older people with cognitive impairment in acute care (POPAC) scale.荷兰急性护理中认知障碍老年人以患者为中心护理(POPAC)量表的验证与心理测量学评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06048-x.
10
Validation of the Dutch language version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-NL).荷兰语版安全态度问卷(SAQ-NL)的验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 15;16(a):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1648-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the oncofertility barriers scales among nurses: A methodological study.护士群体中韩国版生育力保留障碍量表的心理测量学特性:一项方法学研究。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jul 10;10(9):100275. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100275. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Individualized Health Care for Older Diabetes Patients from the Perspective of Health Professionals and Service Consumers.从健康专业人员和服务消费者角度看老年糖尿病患者的个性化医疗保健
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 27;11(7):608. doi: 10.3390/jpm11070608.
3
Feasibility and early effectiveness of the Tell-us Card communication tool to increase in-hospital patient participation: a cluster randomised controlled pilot study.用于提高住院患者参与度的Tell-us Card沟通工具的可行性和早期效果:一项整群随机对照试验研究
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Sep 21;35(3):911-22. doi: 10.1111/scs.12909.

本文引用的文献

1
How is patient involvement measured in patient centeredness scales for health professionals? A systematic review of their measurement properties and content.如何在以患者为中心的卫生专业人员量表中衡量患者的参与度?对其测量特性和内容的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3798-y.
2
Individualized Care Scale-patient: A Spanish validation study.个体化护理量表-患者:西班牙语验证研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Sep;26(6):1791-1804. doi: 10.1177/0969733018769351. Epub 2018 May 7.
3
How to practice person-centred care: A conceptual framework.如何实践以患者为中心的护理:概念框架。
Health Expect. 2018 Apr;21(2):429-440. doi: 10.1111/hex.12640. Epub 2017 Nov 19.
4
A Monte Carlo Investigation of Methods for Controlling Type I Errors with Specification Searches in Structural Equation Modeling.结构方程模型中通过规范搜索控制I型错误方法的蒙特卡洛研究
Multivariate Behav Res. 1998 Jul 1;33(3):365-83. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3303_3.
5
Factors Influencing Cross-Validation of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models.影响验证性因素分析模型交叉验证的因素
Multivariate Behav Res. 1993 Jul 1;28(3):351-74. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2803_3.
6
Model Modification in Covariance Structure Modeling: A Comparison among Likelihood Ratio, Lagrange Multiplier, and Wald Tests.协方差结构建模中的模型修正:似然比、拉格朗日乘数和 Wald 检验的比较。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Jan 1;25(1):115-36. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_13.
7
The German version of the Individualized Care Scale - assessing validity and reliability.《个性化护理量表》德文版——评估效度和信度。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Mar 23;9:483-94. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S77486. eCollection 2015.
8
A systematic review of instruments measuring patients' perceptions of patient-centred nursing care.一项关于测量患者对以患者为中心的护理服务认知的工具的系统评价。
Nurs Inq. 2015 Jun;22(2):106-20. doi: 10.1111/nin.12078. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
9
Patient-centered approaches to health care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.以患者为中心的医疗保健方法:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Dec;70(6):567-96. doi: 10.1177/1077558713496318. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
10
Patient satisfaction as an outcome of individualised nursing care.患者满意度作为个性化护理的一项成果。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Jun;26(2):372-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00943.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10.