• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院外心脏骤停后出院时神经学预后评分对长期神经状态的预测价值:一项系统评价

Predictive value of hospital discharge neurological outcome scores for long-term neurological status following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.

作者信息

Wu Wen, Chopra Amit, Ziegler Carolyn, McLeod Shelley L, Lin Steve

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2020 Jun;151:139-144. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.013
PMID:32304801
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Neurological status following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is commonly assessed using measures such as the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) at hospital discharge. However, it remains unclear if these measures accurately reflect long-term neurological status after discharge. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the association between post-arrest neurological outcome scores at hospital discharge and long-term (>6 months) neurological outcome scores.

METHODS

Comprehensive database searches of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library databases from inception to August 2019 were conducted and reference lists were hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and prospective observational studies were included.

RESULTS

After screening 7844 titles and abstracts independently and in duplicate, we included 7 studies with a total of 602 patients from 6 prospective observational studies and 1 RCT. Four studies reported long-term follow-up at 6 months post-arrest and three studies reported follow-up at 1 year. In the studies with 6-month follow-up, 368 patients (82.7%) had favorable short-term neurological scores (CPC 1-2) at discharge or 30 days post-arrest, and 352 patients (79.1%) had favorable scores at 6 months post-arrest. In the studies with 1-year follow-up, 101 patients (64.3%) had favorable neurological scores at discharge or 30 days post-arrest, and 91 patients (59.5%) patients had favorable neurological scores at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term neurological outcome scores following OHCA were consistent with short-term outcome at hospital discharge or 30 days post-arrest. All included studies measured neurological outcome using CPC, further studies are needed using other standards to better elucidate patient-centered long-term neurological outcome.

摘要

引言

院外心脏骤停后的神经功能状态通常在出院时使用诸如脑功能分级(CPC)等指标进行评估。然而,这些指标是否能准确反映出院后的长期神经功能状态仍不清楚。本系统评价的目的是确定出院时心脏骤停后神经功能结局评分与长期(>6个月)神经功能结局评分之间的关联。

方法

对Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库从创建到2019年8月进行全面检索,并手工检索参考文献列表。纳入随机对照试验(RCT)和前瞻性观察性研究。

结果

在独立且重复筛选7844篇标题和摘要后,我们纳入了7项研究,共602例患者,来自6项前瞻性观察性研究和1项RCT。4项研究报告了心脏骤停后6个月的长期随访,3项研究报告了1年的随访。在6个月随访的研究中,368例患者(82.7%)在出院时或心脏骤停后30天有良好的短期神经功能评分(CPC 1-2),352例患者(79.1%)在心脏骤停后6个月有良好的评分。在1年随访的研究中,101例患者(64.3%)在出院时或心脏骤停后30天有良好的神经功能评分,91例患者(59.5%)在1年时有良好的神经功能评分。

结论

院外心脏骤停后的长期神经功能结局评分与出院时或心脏骤停后30天的短期结局一致。所有纳入研究均使用CPC测量神经功能结局,需要进一步使用其他标准进行研究,以更好地阐明以患者为中心的长期神经功能结局。

相似文献

1
Predictive value of hospital discharge neurological outcome scores for long-term neurological status following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.院外心脏骤停后出院时神经学预后评分对长期神经状态的预测价值:一项系统评价
Resuscitation. 2020 Jun;151:139-144. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Predictors of long-term survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the impact of Activities of Daily Living and Cerebral Performance Category scores.院外心脏骤停后长期生存的预测因素:日常生活活动和脑功能分类评分的影响。
Resuscitation. 2014 Aug;85(8):1052-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.03.312. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
3
Community first responders for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults and children.成人及儿童院外心脏骤停的社区第一响应者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 19;7(7):CD012764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012764.pub2.
4
Comparison of prognosis between extracorporeal CPR and conventional CPR for patients in cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外心肺复苏与传统心肺复苏治疗心搏骤停患者预后比较的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 27;24(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01058-y.
5
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with cardiac arrest: a comparative meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.成人心脏骤停患者体外心肺复苏与传统心肺复苏的比较:一项比较性荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Oct;11(10):883-893. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00137-6. Epub 2023 May 22.
6
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.持续胸外按压与间断胸外按压用于非窒息性院外心脏骤停心肺复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD010134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2.
7
Impact of Early Vasopressor Administration on Neurological Outcomes after Prolonged Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.早期使用血管升压药对长时间院外心脏骤停后神经功能结局的影响。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Jun;32(3):297-304. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17000115. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
8
Association between functional status at hospital discharge and long-term survival after out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest.出院时的功能状态与院外心脏骤停后长期生存的关系。
Resuscitation. 2021 Jul;164:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.04.031. Epub 2021 May 19.
9
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus delayed defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停时心肺复苏(CPR)加延迟除颤与立即除颤的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 12;2014(9):CD009803. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009803.pub2.
10
Does care at a cardiac arrest centre improve outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? - A systematic review.心脏骤停中心的护理是否能改善院外心脏骤停后的预后?——系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2019 Apr;137:102-115. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-resuscitation pneumothorax: retrospective analysis of incidence, risk factors and outcome-relevance.复苏后气胸:发生率、危险因素和预后相关性的回顾性分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Sep 5;32(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01260-8.
2
Misconceptions and do-not-resuscitate preferences of healthcare professionals commonly involved in cardiopulmonary resuscitations: A national survey.参与心肺复苏的医护人员的误解及不进行心肺复苏的偏好:一项全国性调查。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Feb 13;17:100575. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100575. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Prehospital predicting factors using a decision tree model for patients with witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and an initial shockable rhythm.
使用决策树模型预测院外目击心脏骤停且初始可除颤节律患者的院前预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):16180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43106-w.
4
"Do-not-resuscitate" preferences of the general Swiss population: Results from a national survey.瑞士普通民众的“不进行心肺复苏”偏好:一项全国性调查的结果。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Apr 5;14:100383. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100383. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Efficacy of acupuncture for cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.针刺用于心肺脑复苏的疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Integr Med Res. 2023 Mar;12(1):100925. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2023.100925. Epub 2023 Feb 5.