• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦本科及研究生阶段护理专业学生的健康素养、数字素养和电子健康素养:一项横断面研究。

Health literacy, digital literacy and eHealth literacy in Danish nursing students at entry and graduate level: a cross sectional study.

作者信息

Holt Kamila Adellund, Overgaard Dorthe, Engel Lisbeth Vinberg, Kayser Lars

机构信息

Faculty of Health, Department of Nursing and Nutrition, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark.

2Department of Public Health, Section of Health Service Research, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2020 Apr 10;19:22. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00418-w. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-020-00418-w
PMID:32308559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7149891/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing number of people living with one or more chronic conditions imposes a growing demand on healthcare providers. One way to handle this challenge is by re-orientating the way care is provided, empower people and increase their ability to manage their condition. This requires, amongst other factors, sufficient level of health literacy (HL) and digital competences among both patients and the healthcare providers, who serve them. The focus of this study is the level of HL, digital literacy (DL), and eHealth literacy (eHL) in nursing students in Denmark.The objective was to examine the level of these three literacies in entry- and graduate-level nursing students and examine sociodemographic characteristics and self-rated health (SRH) associations.

METHODS

A cross sectional study was conducted among 227 students at entry-level and 139 students at graduate-level from a nursing program. The survey consisted of the health literacy questionnaire (HLQ (nine scales)), the eHealth Literacy Assessment toolkit (eHLA (seven scales)), the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ (seven scales)), questions soliciting sociodemographic data, and a single item assessing the students' SRH. Pearson's chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney test were used to examine the differences in HL, DL, and eHL and between groups, and Kendall's tau-b test to examine correlations between SRH and HL, DL, and eHL.

RESULTS

The level of HL, DL and eHL tended to be higher among graduate-level students than in entry-level students and was satisfactory. Age, sex, country of origin, and parents' educational level and occupational background influenced students' HL levels. SRH was higher in students at the graduate level. Amongst entry-level students, SRH was positively associated to seven HLQ, four EHLA and four eHLQ, amongst graduate-level students, SRH was positively associated to seven HLQ and six eHLQ.

CONCLUSIONS

Educators must be aware of how sociodemographic factors affects students' literacies and increase learning opportunities by mixing students when planning activities. Considering the higher SRH in graduate-level students, HL, DL, and eHL levels indicate that current curricula and study activities are appropriate, but there is still room for improvement.

摘要

背景

患有一种或多种慢性病的人数不断增加,这对医疗服务提供者的需求也日益增长。应对这一挑战的一种方法是重新调整护理提供方式,赋予人们权力并提高他们管理自身病情的能力。这除其他因素外,还需要患者及其服务的医疗服务提供者具备足够水平的健康素养(HL)和数字能力。本研究的重点是丹麦护理专业学生的健康素养、数字素养(DL)和电子健康素养(eHL)水平。目的是检查本科和研究生阶段护理专业学生的这三种素养水平,并研究社会人口学特征和自评健康(SRH)之间的关联。

方法

对一个护理专业项目中的227名本科学生和139名研究生进行了横断面研究。调查包括健康素养问卷(HLQ(九个量表))、电子健康素养评估工具包(eHLA(七个量表))、电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ(七个量表))、征集社会人口学数据的问题,以及一个评估学生自评健康的单项问题。使用Pearson卡方检验和Mann-Whitney检验来检查本科和研究生组之间HL、DL和eHL的差异,使用Kendall's tau-b检验来检查SRH与HL、DL和eHL之间的相关性。

结果

研究生阶段学生的HL、DL和eHL水平往往高于本科学生,且水平令人满意。年龄、性别、原籍国、父母的教育水平和职业背景会影响学生的HL水平。研究生阶段学生的SRH更高。在本科学生中,SRH与七个HLQ量表、四个eHLA量表和四个eHLQ量表呈正相关,在研究生阶段学生中,SRH与七个HLQ量表和六个eHLQ量表呈正相关。

结论

教育工作者必须意识到社会人口学因素如何影响学生的素养,并在规划活动时通过混合不同学生来增加学习机会。考虑到研究生阶段学生的SRH较高,HL、DL和eHL水平表明当前的课程和学习活动是合适的,但仍有改进空间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eff/7149891/e53a2b8e851c/12912_2020_418_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eff/7149891/e53a2b8e851c/12912_2020_418_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eff/7149891/e53a2b8e851c/12912_2020_418_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Health literacy, digital literacy and eHealth literacy in Danish nursing students at entry and graduate level: a cross sectional study.丹麦本科及研究生阶段护理专业学生的健康素养、数字素养和电子健康素养:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2020 Apr 10;19:22. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00418-w. eCollection 2020.
2
Differences in the Level of Electronic Health Literacy Between Users and Nonusers of Digital Health Services: An Exploratory Survey of a Group of Medical Outpatients.数字健康服务使用者与非使用者之间的电子健康素养水平差异:一组门诊患者的探索性调查
Interact J Med Res. 2019 Apr 5;8(2):e8423. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.8423.
3
Profiles of health literacy and digital health literacy in clusters of hospitalised patients: a single-centre, cross-sectional study.住院患者群体的健康素养和数字健康素养特征:一项单中心、横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 20;14(5):e077440. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077440.
4
ehealth literacy and health literacy among immigrants and their descendants compared with women of Danish origin: a cross-sectional study using a multidimensional approach among pregnant women.与丹麦裔女性相比,移民及其后代的电子健康素养和健康素养:一项对孕妇采用多维度方法的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 7;10(5):e037076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037076.
5
Serbian Version of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation Study Among Primary Health Care Users.电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)塞尔维亚语版:初级卫生保健用户翻译、文化调适和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 9;26:e57963. doi: 10.2196/57963.
6
Validity Testing and Cultural Adaptation of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Among People With Chronic Diseases in Taiwan: Mixed Methods Study.电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)在台湾慢性病患者中的有效性检验和文化调适:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 19;24(1):e32855. doi: 10.2196/32855.
7
Validity Evidence of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Part 2: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Test Content, Response Process, and Internal Structure in the Australian Community Health Setting.电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)第二部分的有效性证据:在澳大利亚社区卫生环境中评估测试内容、反应过程和内部结构的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 8;24(3):e32777. doi: 10.2196/32777.
8
The mediating effects of digital literacy and self-efficacy on the relationship between learning attitudes and Ehealth literacy in nursing students: A cross-sectional study.数字素养和自我效能感对护生学习态度与电子健康素养关系的中介作用:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jun;113:105378. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105378. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
9
Validity Evidence Based on Relations to Other Variables of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): Bayesian Approach to Test for Known-Groups Validity.基于与其他变量关系的电子健康素养问卷 (eHLQ) 的有效性证据:用于检验已知组有效性的贝叶斯方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 14;23(10):e30243. doi: 10.2196/30243.
10
eHealth Literacy of Australian Undergraduate Health Profession Students: A Descriptive Study.澳大利亚本科健康专业学生的电子健康素养:一项描述性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10751. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710751.

引用本文的文献

1
Indonesian medical students' experiences and challenges of enhancing information literacy skills: a mixed-method study.印度尼西亚医学生提高信息素养技能的经历与挑战:一项混合方法研究。
Korean J Med Educ. 2025 Sep;37(3):303-317. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2025.343. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
2
Access to healthy ınformatıon: the ınteractıon of medıa lıteracy and health lıteracy.获取健康信息:媒体素养与健康素养的相互作用。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 16;25(1):2800. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24022-2.
3
Factors predicting eHealth literacy: A profile of California, USA.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-reported eHealth literacy skills among nursing students in Sri Lanka: A cross-sectional study.斯里兰卡护理专业学生自我报告的电子健康素养技能:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Jul;78:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
2
A new understanding of health related empowerment in the context of an active and healthy ageing.在积极健康老龄化背景下对健康相关赋权的新认识。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 24;19(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4082-5.
3
Differences in the Level of Electronic Health Literacy Between Users and Nonusers of Digital Health Services: An Exploratory Survey of a Group of Medical Outpatients.
预测电子健康素养的因素:美国加利福尼亚州概况
PEC Innov. 2025 Jun 28;7:100410. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100410. eCollection 2025 Dec.
4
Psychological Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and eHealth Literacy Among Nursing Students in the United States and Türkiye, 2022.2022年美国和土耳其护理专业学生中新冠疫情的心理影响及电子健康素养
Public Health Rep. 2025 Jun 9:333549251341230. doi: 10.1177/00333549251341230.
5
Digital natives: A systematic review of the digital health literacy and influencing factors among Chinese college students.数字原生代:中国大学生数字健康素养及其影响因素的系统评价
Digit Health. 2025 May 25;11:20552076251346006. doi: 10.1177/20552076251346006. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Digital empowerment in nursing: A cross-sectional exploration of digital competencies in healthcare services among nurses.护理中的数字赋能:护士在医疗服务中数字能力的横断面探索。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Jan 31;14:26. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_439_24. eCollection 2025.
7
The Impact of eHealth Literacy on Health Behaviors for Non-communicable Disease Prevention Among University Students in Japan and Indonesia.电子健康素养对日本和印度尼西亚大学生预防非传染性疾病健康行为的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 3;17(2):e78450. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78450. eCollection 2025 Feb.
8
Sociodemographic Determinants of Health Literacy Among University Students of Health Sciences in Kosovo.科索沃健康科学专业大学生健康素养的社会人口学决定因素
Zdr Varst. 2025 Feb 28;64(2):121-128. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2025-0015. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Health literacy and influencing factors in university students across diverse educational fields in Kazakhstan.哈萨克斯坦不同教育领域大学生的健康素养及其影响因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):3197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87049-w.
10
Behavioral correlates of health literacy among university students of health sciences in Kosovo: a cross-sectional study.科索沃健康科学专业大学生健康素养的行为关联:一项横断面研究。
Croat Med J. 2024 Dec 30;65(6):493-500. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.493.
数字健康服务使用者与非使用者之间的电子健康素养水平差异:一组门诊患者的探索性调查
Interact J Med Res. 2019 Apr 5;8(2):e8423. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.8423.
4
Development of the Multidimensional Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY) Tool to Measure Individuals' Health Technology Readiness: Initial Testing in a Cancer Rehabilitation Setting.用于测量个体健康技术准备情况的健康技术多维准备与赋能指数(READHY)工具的开发:在癌症康复环境中的初步测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 12;21(2):e10377. doi: 10.2196/10377.
5
Improving the digital literacy competence of nursing and midwifery students: A qualitative study of the experiences of NICE student champions.提高护理和助产学学生的数字素养能力:NICE 学生冠军经验的定性研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Jan;34:192-198. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.11.016. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
Investigation of health literacy and affecting factors of nursing students.护理专业学生健康素养及其影响因素的调查。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Jan;34:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
7
The right way for nurses to prescribe, administer and critique digital therapies.护士开具、管理和评估数字疗法的正确方式。
Contemp Nurse. 2018 Aug-Oct;54(4-5):543-545. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2018.1507679. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
8
The ability to obtain, appraise and understand health information among undergraduate nursing students in a medical university in Chongqing, China.中国重庆某医科大学本科护理专业学生获取、评估和理解健康信息的能力。
Nurs Open. 2018 May 21;5(3):384-392. doi: 10.1002/nop2.161. eCollection 2018 Jul.
9
Assessing Competencies Needed to Engage With Digital Health Services: Development of the eHealth Literacy Assessment Toolkit.评估参与数字健康服务所需的能力:电子健康素养评估工具包的开发。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 10;20(5):e178. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8347.
10
A Multidimensional Tool Based on the eHealth Literacy Framework: Development and Initial Validity Testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ).基于电子健康素养框架的多维工具:电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)的开发与初始效度测试
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 12;20(2):e36. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8371.