• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用电子健康记录活动来代表跨学科护理团队并考察其对住院时间的影响。

Using Electronic Health Record Activity to Represent Interdisciplinary Care Teams and Examining their Contribution to Hospital Length of Stay.

作者信息

Walpitage Dammika L, Garcia Amy, Harper Ellen, Sharma Neena K, Waitman Lemuel R

机构信息

Division of Medical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine.

School of Nursing.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:883-892. eCollection 2019.

PMID:32308885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7153122/
Abstract

Modeling variance in patient outcomes using medical claims and other forms of aggregated administrative data may ignore significant contributions associated with providers who are not recorded in billing transactions. We examined the association between interdisciplinary provider factors and length of stay (LOS) for 1,099 lumbar spine surgery patients. Interdisciplinary provider "dose" (number of providers/case), "workload" (care of other patients), and "activity" factors were defined and generated. Hierarchical Regression models were used to test the impact of these provider factors controlling for the effect of socio-demographic and clinical factors. Interdisciplinary provider factors explained 12% of additional variance in LOS. EHR-based interdisciplinary care team representations hold promise in contributing to our understanding of health care delivery and quality. interdisciplinary care, nursing documentation, workload, length of stay, electronic health records (EHR).

摘要

使用医疗理赔数据和其他形式的汇总管理数据对患者预后的差异进行建模,可能会忽略与未记录在计费交易中的医疗服务提供者相关的重大贡献。我们研究了1099例腰椎手术患者的跨学科医疗服务提供者因素与住院时间(LOS)之间的关联。定义并生成了跨学科医疗服务提供者的“剂量”(每个病例的医疗服务提供者数量)、“工作量”(对其他患者的护理)和“活动”因素。使用分层回归模型来测试这些医疗服务提供者因素在控制社会人口统计学和临床因素影响方面的作用。跨学科医疗服务提供者因素解释了住院时间额外12%的差异。基于电子健康记录(EHR)的跨学科护理团队表现有望有助于我们理解医疗服务的提供和质量。跨学科护理、护理记录、工作量、住院时间、电子健康记录(EHR)。

相似文献

1
Using Electronic Health Record Activity to Represent Interdisciplinary Care Teams and Examining their Contribution to Hospital Length of Stay.利用电子健康记录活动来代表跨学科护理团队并考察其对住院时间的影响。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:883-892. eCollection 2019.
2
Modeling Care Team Structures in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit through Network Analysis of EHR Audit Logs.通过电子健康记录审计日志的网络分析对新生儿重症监护病房的护理团队结构进行建模。
Methods Inf Med. 2019 Nov;58(4-05):109-123. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702237. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
3
Factors affecting length of stay after elective posterior lumbar spine surgery: a multivariate analysis.影响择期腰椎后路手术后住院时间的因素:一项多因素分析
Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.022. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
4
Defragmenting care: testing an intervention to increase the effectiveness of interdisciplinary health care teams.优化护理:测试一项提高跨学科医疗团队有效性的干预措施。
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2010 Jun;22(2):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 May 14.
5
Medicaid payer status and other factors associated with hospital length of stay in patients undergoing primary lumbar spine surgery.接受原发性腰椎手术患者的医疗补助支付者身份和其他因素与住院时间的关系。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;188:105570. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105570. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
6
Predictors of extended length of stay, discharge to inpatient rehab, and hospital readmission following elective lumbar spine surgery: introduction of the Carolina-Semmes Grading Scale.择期腰椎手术后延长住院时间、出院至住院康复机构以及再次入院的预测因素:卡罗莱纳-塞姆斯分级量表的引入
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):382-390. doi: 10.3171/2016.12.SPINE16928. Epub 2017 May 12.
7
Comparing Population-based Risk-stratification Model Performance Using Demographic, Diagnosis and Medication Data Extracted From Outpatient Electronic Health Records Versus Administrative Claims.使用从门诊电子健康记录与行政索赔中提取的人口统计学、诊断和用药数据比较基于人群的风险分层模型性能。
Med Care. 2017 Aug;55(8):789-796. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000754.
8
The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: A systematic review.电子健康记录系统对临床文档记录时间的影响:系统评价。
Health Policy. 2018 Aug;122(8):827-836. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
9
Anesthesia Clinical Workload Estimated From Electronic Health Record Documentation vs Billed Relative Value Units.从电子健康记录文档中估算的麻醉临床工作量与计费相对值单位。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328514. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28514.
10
A team approach to anterior lumbar spine surgery in the military.军队中腰椎前路手术的团队协作方法。
Vascular. 2014 Aug;22(4):246-51. doi: 10.1177/1708538113478757. Epub 2013 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding hospital activity and outcomes for people with multimorbidity using electronic health records.利用电子健康记录了解患有多种疾病的患者的医院活动及治疗结果。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 12;15(1):8522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92940-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Robust clinical marker identification for diabetic kidney disease with ensemble feature selection.基于集成特征选择的糖尿病肾病稳健临床标志物识别。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Mar 1;26(3):242-253. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy165.
2
Feature Ranking in Predictive Models for Hospital-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury.预测模型中用于医院获得性急性肾损伤的特征排名。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 23;8(1):17298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35487-0.
3
Reduced length of stay and hospitalization costs among inpatient hysterectomy patients with postoperative pain management including IV versus oral acetaminophen.与术后仅使用口服对乙酰氨基酚相比,接受包括静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚在内的术后疼痛管理的住院子宫切除术患者的住院时间和住院费用减少。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203746. eCollection 2018.
4
Associations of Nurse Staffing and Education With the Length of Stay of Surgical Patients.护士人员配备和教育与手术患者住院时间的关联。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Mar;50(2):210-218. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12366. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
The impact of the advanced practice nursing role on quality of care, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost in the emergency and critical care settings: a systematic review.高级实践护理角色对急诊和危重症护理环境中的护理质量、临床结果、患者满意度和成本的影响:系统评价。
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Sep 11;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12960-017-0237-9.
6
Impact of Provider Characteristics on Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis in New York State.提供者特征对纽约州无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术结局的影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;45:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 31.
7
Variation in Physician Spending and Association With Patient Outcomes.医生支出的差异及其与患者预后的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):675-682. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0059.
8
Important factors in predicting mortality outcome from stroke: findings from the Anglia Stroke Clinical Network Evaluation Study.预测卒中死亡率的重要因素:来自安格利亚卒中临床网络评估研究的发现。
Age Ageing. 2017 Jan 28;46(1):83-90. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw175.
9
Role of Patient and Practice Characteristics in Variance of Treatment Quality in Type 2 Diabetes between General Practices.患者及诊所特征在全科诊所2型糖尿病治疗质量差异中的作用
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 2;11(11):e0166012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166012. eCollection 2016.
10
Opportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review.利用电子健康记录数据开发风险预测模型的机遇与挑战:一项系统综述
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):198-208. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw042. Epub 2016 May 17.