Suppr超能文献

探索药学教育研究人员对定性研究的认知和经验。

An Exploration of Pharmacy Education Researchers' Perceptions and Experiences Conducting Qualitative Research.

机构信息

UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Guest Editor, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Arlington, Virginia.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Mar;84(3):ajpe7129. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7129.

Abstract

To investigate pharmacy education researchers' experiences in conducting qualitative research and their perceptions of qualitative research in pharmacy education A phenomenological approach was used to conduct one-time, in-depth interviews with 19 participants from 12 schools and colleges of pharmacy. Interview transcripts were coded and themes were identified using a modified form of the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift method of data analysis. Faculty members were the largest subgroup in the sample, followed by graduate students, postdoctoral fellows/scholars, and residents. Pharmacy education researchers had varying levels of training in conducting qualitative research and some had none at all. Salient findings included that pharmacy educators' lack of training and exposure to qualitative research was a barrier to entry to conducting qualitative research; the lack of understanding and value of qualitative research in pharmacy education impacts the acceptability of qualitative research projects in Journals and academic meetings; and qualitative research offers several benefits in answering complex research questions. The application of rigorous qualitative research in pharmacy education holds great potential in addressing complex and evolving healthcare problems. This work provides empirical evidence of the ongoing anecdotal dialogue that has long existed in pharmacy education concerning why some researchers are hesitant to conduct qualitative research, the challenges encountered by those who employ qualitative approaches, and the benefits qualitative approaches provide.

摘要

为了调查药学教育研究人员在进行定性研究方面的经验以及他们对药学教育中定性研究的看法,本研究采用现象学方法,对来自 12 所药学院校的 19 名参与者进行了一次性深入访谈。对访谈记录进行编码,并使用数据分析的“Sort and Sift, Think and Shift”方法的一种修改形式来确定主题。

在样本中,教职员工是最大的亚组,其次是研究生、博士后研究员/学者和住院医师。药学教育研究人员在进行定性研究方面的培训程度参差不齐,有些人根本没有接受过培训。突出的发现包括,药学教育者缺乏进行定性研究的培训和经验是进入定性研究的障碍;药学教育中对定性研究的理解和重视不足,影响了定性研究项目在期刊和学术会议上的可接受性;定性研究在回答复杂研究问题方面具有多项优势。

严格的定性研究在药学教育中的应用具有很大的潜力,可以解决复杂和不断发展的医疗保健问题。这项工作提供了实证证据,证明了长期以来在药学教育中一直存在的轶事对话,即为什么有些研究人员不愿意进行定性研究,那些采用定性方法的人所面临的挑战,以及定性方法提供的好处。

相似文献

3
Conducting and presenting qualitative research in pharmacy education.开展并展示药学教育中的定性研究。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Jun;11(6):638-650. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验