UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Guest Editor, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Arlington, Virginia.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Mar;84(3):ajpe7129. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7129.
To investigate pharmacy education researchers' experiences in conducting qualitative research and their perceptions of qualitative research in pharmacy education A phenomenological approach was used to conduct one-time, in-depth interviews with 19 participants from 12 schools and colleges of pharmacy. Interview transcripts were coded and themes were identified using a modified form of the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift method of data analysis. Faculty members were the largest subgroup in the sample, followed by graduate students, postdoctoral fellows/scholars, and residents. Pharmacy education researchers had varying levels of training in conducting qualitative research and some had none at all. Salient findings included that pharmacy educators' lack of training and exposure to qualitative research was a barrier to entry to conducting qualitative research; the lack of understanding and value of qualitative research in pharmacy education impacts the acceptability of qualitative research projects in Journals and academic meetings; and qualitative research offers several benefits in answering complex research questions. The application of rigorous qualitative research in pharmacy education holds great potential in addressing complex and evolving healthcare problems. This work provides empirical evidence of the ongoing anecdotal dialogue that has long existed in pharmacy education concerning why some researchers are hesitant to conduct qualitative research, the challenges encountered by those who employ qualitative approaches, and the benefits qualitative approaches provide.
为了调查药学教育研究人员在进行定性研究方面的经验以及他们对药学教育中定性研究的看法,本研究采用现象学方法,对来自 12 所药学院校的 19 名参与者进行了一次性深入访谈。对访谈记录进行编码,并使用数据分析的“Sort and Sift, Think and Shift”方法的一种修改形式来确定主题。
在样本中,教职员工是最大的亚组,其次是研究生、博士后研究员/学者和住院医师。药学教育研究人员在进行定性研究方面的培训程度参差不齐,有些人根本没有接受过培训。突出的发现包括,药学教育者缺乏进行定性研究的培训和经验是进入定性研究的障碍;药学教育中对定性研究的理解和重视不足,影响了定性研究项目在期刊和学术会议上的可接受性;定性研究在回答复杂研究问题方面具有多项优势。
严格的定性研究在药学教育中的应用具有很大的潜力,可以解决复杂和不断发展的医疗保健问题。这项工作提供了实证证据,证明了长期以来在药学教育中一直存在的轶事对话,即为什么有些研究人员不愿意进行定性研究,那些采用定性方法的人所面临的挑战,以及定性方法提供的好处。