Dror Itiel E
UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences, University College London, London, U.K.
Cognitive Consultants Internationals (CCI-HQ), London, U.K.
J Forensic Sci. 2020 Jul;65(4):1034-1039. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14435. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
Establishing error rates is crucial for knowing how well one is performing, determining whether improvement is needed, measuring whether interventions are effective, as well as for providing transparency. However, the flurry of activities in establishing error rates for the forensic sciences has largely overlooked some fundamental issues that make error rates a problematic construct and limit the ability to obtain a meaningful error rate. These include knowing the ground truth, establishing appropriate databases, determining what counts as an error, characterizing what is an acceptable error rate, ecological validity, and transparency within the adversarial legal system. Without addressing these practical and theoretical challenges, the very notion of a meaningful error rate is limited.
确定错误率对于了解自身表现、判断是否需要改进、衡量干预措施是否有效以及提高透明度至关重要。然而,在为法医学确定错误率时的一系列活动,很大程度上忽略了一些基本问题,这些问题使得错误率成为一个有问题的概念,并限制了获得有意义错误率的能力。这些问题包括了解基本事实、建立合适的数据库、确定什么算作错误、界定可接受的错误率、生态效度以及对抗性法律体系中的透明度。如果不解决这些实践和理论挑战,有意义错误率这一概念本身就会受到限制。