Suppr超能文献

视听和词汇线索不会相加增强感知适应。

Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Donders Centre for Cognition, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 AH, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Aug;27(4):707-715. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01728-5.

Abstract

When listeners experience difficulty in understanding a speaker, lexical and audiovisual (or lipreading) information can be a helpful source of guidance. These two types of information embedded in speech can also guide perceptual adjustment, also known as recalibration or perceptual retuning. With retuning or recalibration, listeners can use these contextual cues to temporarily or permanently reconfigure internal representations of phoneme categories to adjust to and understand novel interlocutors more easily. These two types of perceptual learning, previously investigated in large part separately, are highly similar in allowing listeners to use speech-external information to make phoneme boundary adjustments. This study explored whether the two sources may work in conjunction to induce adaptation, thus emulating real life, in which listeners are indeed likely to encounter both types of cue together. Listeners who received combined audiovisual and lexical cues showed perceptual learning effects similar to listeners who only received audiovisual cues, while listeners who received only lexical cues showed weaker effects compared with the two other groups. The combination of cues did not lead to additive retuning or recalibration effects, suggesting that lexical and audiovisual cues operate differently with regard to how listeners use them for reshaping perceptual categories. Reaction times did not significantly differ across the three conditions, so none of the forms of adjustment were either aided or hindered by processing time differences. Mechanisms underlying these forms of perceptual learning may diverge in numerous ways despite similarities in experimental applications.

摘要

当听众在理解说话者时遇到困难时,词汇和视听(或唇读)信息可以成为有帮助的指导来源。这些嵌入在语音中的两种信息也可以指导感知调整,也称为重新校准或感知调谐。通过重新调谐或重新校准,听众可以使用这些上下文线索来暂时或永久地重新配置语音类别内部表示,以更轻松地适应和理解新的对话者。这两种类型的感知学习,以前在很大程度上是分别研究的,它们非常相似,都允许听众使用语音外部信息来进行语音边界调整。本研究探讨了这两种来源是否可以协同作用以引起适应,从而模拟现实生活,在现实生活中,听众确实可能同时遇到这两种类型的线索。同时接受视听和词汇线索的听众表现出与仅接受视听线索的听众相似的感知学习效果,而仅接受词汇线索的听众的效果则比其他两组听众弱。线索的组合并没有导致附加的重新调谐或重新校准效果,这表明词汇和视听线索在听众如何利用它们来重塑感知类别方面的作用不同。反应时间在三种条件下没有显著差异,因此,这些调整形式都没有因处理时间差异而受到帮助或阻碍。尽管实验应用相似,但这些形式的感知学习的潜在机制可能会在许多方面出现分歧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验