Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
J Nutr Sci. 2020 Apr 6;9:e15. doi: 10.1017/jns.2020.8. eCollection 2020.
Obesity indicators are known to predict the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, evidence for which indicator best identifies undiagnosed T2DM in the Indian population is still very limited. In the present study we examined the utility of different obesity indicators to identify the presence of undiagnosed T2DM and determined their appropriate cut point for each obesity measure. Individuals were recruited from the large-scale population-based Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program. Oral glucose tolerance tests was performed to diagnose T2DM. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to compare the association of different obesity indicators with T2DM and to determine the optimal cut points for identifying T2DM. A total of 357 new cases of T2DM and 1352 individuals without diabetes were identified. The mean age of the study participants was 46⋅4 (sd 7⋅4) years and 62 % were men. Waist circumference (WC), waist:hip ratio (WHR), waist:height ratio (WHtR), BMI, body fat percentage and fat per square of height were found to be significantly higher ( < 0⋅001) among those with diabetes compared with individuals without diabetes. In addition, ROC for WHR (0⋅67; 95 % 0⋅59, 0⋅75), WHtR (0⋅66; 95 % 0⋅57, 0⋅75) and WC (0⋅64; 95 % 0⋅55, 0⋅73) were shown to better identify patients with T2DM. The proposed cut points with an optimal sensitivity and specificity for WHR, WHtR and WC were 0⋅96, 0⋅56 and 86 cm for men and 0⋅88, 0⋅54 and 83 cm for women, respectively. The present study has shown that WHR, WHtR and WC are better than other anthropometric measures for detecting T2DM in the Indian population. Their utility in clinical practice may better stratify at-risk patients in this population than BMI, which is widely used at present.
肥胖指标已知可预测 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的存在;然而,在印度人群中,哪种指标最能识别未确诊的 T2DM 的证据仍然非常有限。在本研究中,我们检查了不同肥胖指标识别未确诊的 T2DM 的效用,并确定了它们对每种肥胖测量的适当切点。个体是从大规模的基于人群的喀拉拉邦糖尿病预防计划中招募的。口服葡萄糖耐量试验用于诊断 T2DM。接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析用于比较不同肥胖指标与 T2DM 的关联,并确定用于识别 T2DM 的最佳切点。共确定了 357 例新的 T2DM 病例和 1352 例无糖尿病个体。研究参与者的平均年龄为 46.4(标准差 7.4)岁,62%为男性。与无糖尿病个体相比,患有糖尿病的个体的腰围(WC)、腰臀比(WHR)、腰围身高比(WHtR)、BMI、体脂肪百分比和体脂肪平方高度明显更高(<0.001)。此外,WHR(0.67;95%置信区间 0.59, 0.75)、WHtR(0.66;95%置信区间 0.57, 0.75)和 WC(0.64;95%置信区间 0.55, 0.73)的 ROC 显示出更好的识别 T2DM 患者的能力。男性最佳敏感性和特异性的 WHR、WHtR 和 WC 切点分别为 0.96、0.56 和 86cm,女性为 0.88、0.54 和 83cm。本研究表明,WHR、WHtR 和 WC 比其他人体测量指标更能检测印度人群中的 T2DM。它们在临床实践中的应用可能比目前广泛使用的 BMI 更好地对该人群中的高危患者进行分层。