• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁在使用可穿戴活动追踪器以及为何使用?美国过去与现在用户的比较。

Who Uses Wearable Activity Trackers and Why? A Comparison of Former and Current Users in the United States.

作者信息

Friel Ciarán P, Garber Carol Ewing

机构信息

Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, 21611Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2020 Sep;34(7):762-769. doi: 10.1177/0890117120919366. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1177/0890117120919366
PMID:32329355
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been an explosion in the use of wearable activity trackers (WATs), but we do not fully understand who wears them and why. This study's purpose was to describe the characteristics of WAT users and to compare current and former users.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A variety of internet-based resources (eg, Craigslist, Facebook) were used to recruit current and former WAT users. Respondents completed a web-based survey, where they provided information on sociodemographic characteristics, health, physical activity behavior, and about their WAT use.

RESULTS

Of the 2826 respondents who gave informed consent, 70.8% (n = 2002) met inclusion criteria for this analysis. Respondents ranged from 18 to 81 years old (mean 32.9 ± 12.2 standard deviation) with 73.8% women. Most were current WAT users (68.7%), and the average length of WAT use overall was 9.3 ± 9.7 months. On average, current users wore the device for 3.7 months longer than former users. Compared to current users, former users had a lower body mass index (1.2 kg/m less), reported fewer medical conditions, shared data from their device less often, and received the device as a gift more frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

Current and former users varied in their reasons for using a WAT and how they used their device. Differences identified between these groups support further exploration of associations between WAT users' profiles and their physical activity behavior.

摘要

背景

可穿戴活动追踪器(WATs)的使用呈爆发式增长,但我们尚未完全了解哪些人佩戴它们以及原因。本研究的目的是描述WAT用户的特征,并比较当前用户和以前的用户。

材料与方法

利用各种基于互联网的资源(如克雷格列表网、脸书)招募当前和以前的WAT用户。受访者完成了一项基于网络的调查,在调查中他们提供了社会人口学特征、健康状况、身体活动行为以及关于其WAT使用情况的信息。

结果

在2826名给予知情同意的受访者中,70.8%(n = 2002)符合本分析的纳入标准。受访者年龄在18岁至81岁之间(平均32.9±12.2标准差),女性占73.8%。大多数是当前的WAT用户(68.7%),总体上WAT的平均使用时长为9.3±9.7个月。当前用户平均佩戴该设备的时间比以前的用户长3.7个月。与当前用户相比,以前的用户体重指数较低(低1.2kg/m²),报告的健康问题较少,较少分享设备数据,且更频繁地将设备作为礼物收到。

结论

当前用户和以前的用户在使用WAT的原因以及使用设备的方式上存在差异。这些群体之间发现的差异支持进一步探索WAT用户特征与其身体活动行为之间的关联。

相似文献

1
Who Uses Wearable Activity Trackers and Why? A Comparison of Former and Current Users in the United States.谁在使用可穿戴活动追踪器以及为何使用?美国过去与现在用户的比较。
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Sep;34(7):762-769. doi: 10.1177/0890117120919366. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
2
Establishing a Consensus-Based Framework for the Use of Wearable Activity Trackers in Health Care: Delphi Study.建立基于共识的可穿戴活动追踪器在医疗保健中使用的框架:德尔菲研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Aug 23;12:e55254. doi: 10.2196/55254.
3
Users' experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study.可穿戴活动追踪器的用户体验:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4888-1.
4
The frequency of using wearable activity trackers is associated with minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity among cancer survivors: Analysis of HINTS data.佩戴可穿戴活动追踪器的频率与癌症幸存者的中高强度身体活动时间有关:HINTS 数据分析。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;88:102491. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102491. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
5
Physical Activity Surveillance Through Smartphone Apps and Wearable Trackers: Examining the UK Potential for Nationally Representative Sampling.通过智能手机应用程序和可穿戴追踪器进行身体活动监测:研究英国全国代表性抽样的潜力。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 29;7(1):e11898. doi: 10.2196/11898.
6
Associations Among Wearable Activity Tracker Use, Exercise Motivation, and Physical Activity in a Cohort of Cancer Survivors: Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.癌症幸存者队列中可穿戴活动追踪器的使用、运动动机与身体活动之间的关联:健康信息国家趋势调查的二次数据分析
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Apr 12;7(2):e24828. doi: 10.2196/24828.
7
Factors Associated with Older Adults' Long-Term Use of Wearable Activity Trackers.与老年人长期使用可穿戴活动追踪器相关的因素。
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Jun;26(6):769-775. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0052. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
8
Reciprocal Reinforcement Between Wearable Activity Trackers and Social Network Services in Influencing Physical Activity Behaviors.可穿戴活动追踪器与社交网络服务在影响身体活动行为方面的相互促进作用。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jul 5;4(3):e84. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5637.
9
The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Older Adults: Focus Group Study of Tracker Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers in the Maintenance Stage of Behavior Change.可穿戴活动追踪器在老年人中的使用:行为改变维持阶段的追踪器感知、动机和障碍的焦点小组研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 5;7(4):e9832. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9832.
10
Physical Activity Surveillance Using Wearable Activity Monitors: Are US Adults Willing to Share Their Data?使用可穿戴活动监测器进行身体活动监测:美国成年人愿意共享其数据吗?
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Jul;34(6):672-676. doi: 10.1177/0890117119900587. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of consumer-grade physical activity monitors: Insight into psychosocial determinants and technology acceptance.消费级身体活动监测器的使用:对心理社会决定因素和技术接受度的洞察。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Jun 30;46:101516. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101516. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Usage Trends and Data Sharing Practices of Healthcare Wearable Devices Among US Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.美国成年人使用医疗可穿戴设备的趋势及数据共享行为:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 21;27:e63879. doi: 10.2196/63879.
3
Unveiling wearables: exploring the global landscape of biometric applications and vital signs and behavioral impact.
揭开可穿戴设备的面纱:探索生物识别应用、生命体征及行为影响的全球格局。
BioData Min. 2024 Jun 11;17(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13040-024-00368-y.
4
Assessment of ownership of smart devices and the acceptability of digital health data sharing.智能设备所有权评估及数字健康数据共享的可接受性
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Feb 22;7(1):44. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01030-x.
5
Electronic Wearable Device Use for Physical Activity in Older Adults: A Qualitative Study.老年人使用电子可穿戴设备进行身体活动:一项定性研究。
Work Aging Retire. 2022 Nov 12;10(1):25-37. doi: 10.1093/workar/waac023. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Use Patterns of Smartphone Apps and Wearable Devices Supporting Physical Activity and Exercise: Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Survey.使用支持身体活动和锻炼的智能手机应用程序和可穿戴设备模式:大规模横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Nov 22;11:e49148. doi: 10.2196/49148.
7
The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers in Schools to Promote Child and Adolescent Physical Activity: A Descriptive Content Analysis of School Staff's Perspectives.可穿戴活动追踪器在学校中促进儿童和青少年身体活动的使用:学校工作人员观点的描述性内容分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14067. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114067.
8
Feasibility of using activity trackers and apps to increase physical activity in whole families: The Step it Up Family intervention.使用活动追踪器和应用程序增加全家庭身体活动的可行性:“行动起来家庭”干预措施
Digit Health. 2022 Oct 6;8:20552076221129083. doi: 10.1177/20552076221129083. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Experiences of activity monitoring and perceptions of digital support among working individuals with hip and knee osteoarthritis - a focus group study.工作人群髋膝关节骨关节炎活动监测体验和数字支持感知的焦点小组研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):1641. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14065-0.
10
What drives the use of wearable healthcare devices? A cross-country comparison between the US and Korea.是什么推动了可穿戴医疗设备的使用?美国和韩国的跨国比较。
Digit Health. 2022 Aug 17;8:20552076221120319. doi: 10.1177/20552076221120319. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.