测试API（20E）、肠杆菌鉴定管和Pathotec系统的可重复性。
Test reproducibility of the API (20E), Enterotube, and Pathotec systems.
作者信息
Holmes B, Willcox W R, Lapage S P, Malnick H
出版信息
J Clin Pathol. 1977 Apr;30(4):381-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.4.381.
Abstract
Thirty-three strains of bacteria (30 Enterobacteriaceae and one strain each of Aeromonas formicans, A. hydrophila, and Plesiomonas shigelloides) were tested three times in each of 27 conventional tests and in the API, Enterotube, and Pathotec systems. The results obtained were analysed for test reproducibility within each kit, correlation of the kit tests with the equivalent conventional media, and the identification of the strains by the kits. Difficulties in evaluation and comparison of identifications are discussed. A practical evaluation of the kits was also made.
摘要
33株细菌（30株肠杆菌科细菌以及各1株蚁气单胞菌、嗜水气单胞菌和类志贺邻单胞菌）在27项常规试验以及API、Enterotube和Pathotec系统中每项都进行了3次测试。对每个试剂盒内测试的可重复性、试剂盒测试与等效常规培养基的相关性以及用试剂盒对菌株进行鉴定所获得的结果进行了分析。讨论了鉴定评估和比较中的困难。还对试剂盒进行了实际评估。
相似文献
1
Test reproducibility of the API (20E), Enterotube, and Pathotec systems.测试API（20E）、肠杆菌鉴定管和Pathotec系统的可重复性。
J Clin Pathol. 1977 Apr;30(4):381-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.4.381.
2
A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.两种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的商业方法（API 20E和Enterotube）与传统方法的比较。
J Clin Pathol. 1976 Feb;29(2):158-61. doi: 10.1136/jcp.29.2.158.
3
[Comparative evaluation of 3 miniaturized systems (API 20E, Enterotube II, Sensititre AP60) commonly used in clinical microbiology laboratories].
Quad Sclavo Diagn. 1983 Jun;19(2):159-75.
4
Identification of the Enterobacteriaceae: a comparison of the Enterotube II with the API 20E.肠杆菌科细菌的鉴定：Enterotube II与API 20E的比较
J Clin Pathol. 1984 Mar;37(3):344-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.3.344.
5
Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.六种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的系统的比较。
G Batteriol Virol Immunol. 1983 Jan-Jun;76(1-6):3-19.
6
Clinical comparison of the enterotube II and API 20E systems for bacterial identification.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Mar;79(3):367-70. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/79.3.367.
7
Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the API 20E system.使用API 20E系统鉴定肠杆菌科细菌。
J Clin Pathol. 1978 Jan;31(1):22-30. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.1.22.
8
Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.自动微生物鉴定系统与API、肠杆菌鉴定管、微量鉴定系统、微量培养基系统以及用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的传统方法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Nov;12(5):659-62. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.5.659-662.1980.
9
Evaluation of five test-kits-API, AuxoTab, Enterotube, PathoTec and R-B-for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.评估五种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的检测试剂盒——API、AuxoTab、Enterotube、PathoTec和R-B。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 1974 Mar 22;159(3):211-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02121337.
10
引用本文的文献
1
Evaluation of RapID onE system for identification of 379 strains in the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-negative, gram-negative nonfermenters.评估RapID onE系统对肠杆菌科379株菌株以及氧化酶阴性革兰氏阴性非发酵菌的鉴定能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Apr;32(4):931-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.931-934.1994.
2
Misuse and interlaboratory test reproducibility of API 20E system.API 20E系统的误用及实验室间测试的可重复性
J Clin Pathol. 1985 Aug;38(8):937-41. doi: 10.1136/jcp.38.8.937.
3
Evaluation of the Titertek-NF system for identification of gram-negative nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacteria.用于鉴定革兰氏阴性非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌的Titertek-NF系统的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jun;27(6):1201-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1201-1205.1989.
4
Biotyping of Candida albicans: results of an international collaborative survey.白色念珠菌的生物分型：一项国际合作调查的结果。
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jul;27(7):1506-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.7.1506-1509.1989.
5
Comparative evaluation of the Roche Cobas IDA and Enterotube II systems for identifying members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.罗氏Cobas IDA系统与肠杆菌科鉴定管II系统用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌成员的比较评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 May;27(5):1027-30. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.5.1027-1030.1989.
6
API and Minitek systems in identification of clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and Clostridium species.API和Minitek系统在鉴定革兰氏阴性厌氧杆菌和梭菌属临床分离株中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Jul;10(1):14-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.1.14-18.1979.
7
Identification of Pseudomonas pseudomallei in the clinical laboratory.临床实验室中嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的鉴定。
J Clin Pathol. 1979 May;32(5):500-4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.32.5.500.
8
Identification of Gram-negative non-fermenters and oxidase-positive fermenters by the Oxi/Ferm tube.使用氧化/发酵管鉴定革兰氏阴性非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌。
J Clin Pathol. 1979 Jan;32(1):78-85. doi: 10.1136/jcp.32.1.78.
9
Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the API 20E system.使用API 20E系统鉴定肠杆菌科细菌。
J Clin Pathol. 1978 Jan;31(1):22-30. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.1.22.
本文引用的文献
1
The comparison of percentages in matched samples.匹配样本中百分比的比较。
Biometrika. 1950 Dec;37(3-4):256-66.
2
Evaluation of five test-kits-API, AuxoTab, Enterotube, PathoTec and R-B-for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.评估五种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的检测试剂盒——API、AuxoTab、Enterotube、PathoTec和R-B。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 1974 Mar 22;159(3):211-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02121337.
3
A clinical evaluation of the API microtube system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Am J Med Technol. 1974 Feb;40(2):55-61.
4
Identification of bacteria by computer: general aspects and perspectives.利用计算机鉴定细菌：总体情况与展望。
J Gen Microbiol. 1973 Aug;77(2):273-90. doi: 10.1099/00221287-77-2-273.
5
Carbon source utilization tests as an aid to the classification of non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria.碳源利用试验辅助非发酵革兰氏阴性菌的分类
J Gen Microbiol. 1973 Jan;74(1):9-20. doi: 10.1099/00221287-74-1-9.
6
The influence on numerical taxonomic similarities of errors in microbiological tests.微生物学检测中的误差对数值分类学相似性的影响。
J Gen Microbiol. 1972 Sep;72(2):377-92. doi: 10.1099/00221287-72-2-377.
7
Reproducibility of the analytab (API 20E) system.安纳塔布（API 20E）系统的可重复性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Oct;2(4):322-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.4.322-326.1975.
8
A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.两种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的商业方法（API 20E和Enterotube）与传统方法的比较。
J Clin Pathol. 1976 Feb;29(2):158-61. doi: 10.1136/jcp.29.2.158.
Zotero 插件