State Key Laboratory of Biomembrane and Membrane Biotechnology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Shanghai Laiyi Center for Biopharmaceutical R&D, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Microb Cell Fact. 2020 Apr 25;19(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01345-w.
CRISPR/Cas9 systems have been repurposed as canonical genome editing tools in a variety of species, but no application for the model strain Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 was unveiled.
Here we showed two kinds of programmable base editing systems, cytosine base editors (CBEs) and adenine base editors (ABEs), generated by fusing endonuclease Cas9 variant to cytosine deaminase PmCDA1 or heterodimer adenine deaminase TadA-TadA*, respectively. Using CBEs, we were able to obtain C-to-T mutation of single and double targets following the first induction step, with the efficiency of up to 97% and 43%; while the second induction step was needed in the case of triple target, with the screening rate of 47%. Using ABEs, we were only able to gain A-to-G mutation of single target after the second induction step, with the screening rate of 30%. Additionally, we performed a knockout analysis to identify the genes responsible for coenzyme Q10 biosynthesis and found that ubiF, ubiA, ubiG, and ubiX to be the most crucial ones.
Together, CBEs and ABEs serve as alternative methods for genetic manipulation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides and will shed light on the fundamental research of other bacteria that are hard to be directly edited by Cas9-sgRNA.
CRISPR/Cas9 系统已被重新用作多种物种的标准基因组编辑工具,但尚未揭示其在模式菌株球形红杆菌 2.4.1 中的应用。
在这里,我们展示了两种可编程碱基编辑系统,胞嘧啶碱基编辑器(CBEs)和腺嘌呤碱基编辑器(ABEs),它们分别通过融合内切酶 Cas9 变体与胞嘧啶脱氨酶 PmCDA1 或异二聚体腺嘌呤脱氨酶 TadA-TadA* 产生。使用 CBEs,我们能够在第一诱导步骤后获得单靶和双靶的 C 到 T 突变,效率高达 97%和 43%;而在三靶的情况下需要进行第二诱导步骤,筛选率为 47%。使用 ABEs,我们只能在第二诱导步骤后获得单靶的 A 到 G 突变,筛选率为 30%。此外,我们进行了敲除分析以鉴定辅酶 Q10 生物合成的相关基因,发现 ubiF、ubiA、ubiG 和 ubiX 是最重要的基因。
总之,CBEs 和 ABEs 为球形红杆菌的遗传操作提供了替代方法,并为难以直接由 Cas9-sgRNA 编辑的其他细菌的基础研究提供了新的思路。