Xin Xiuqing, Li Ju, Zhao Dongdong, Li Siwei, Xie Qianwen, Li Zhongkang, Fan Feiyu, Bi Changhao, Zhang Xueli
College of Biotechnology , Tianjin University of Science & Technology , Tianjin 300457 , PR China.
Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Tianjin 300308 , PR China.
ACS Synth Biol. 2019 Dec 20;8(12):2629-2634. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00284. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
With the development of CRISPR/Cas9 technology, a new generation of editing methods that convert specific bases has enabled precise single-base mutations. To date, conversion of cytosine to thymidine and adenine to guanine has been achieved using the cytidine deaminase and adenosine deaminase (TadA), respectively. However, the base editing efficiency can be unacceptably low in some cell types or at certain target loci. One reason might be the lack of a selective pressure against the survival of nonedited cells. Few studies on ABE in prokaryotes have been reported, probably due to the relatively low editing efficiency of TadA. Improving the editing efficiency is the key for establishing base editing techniques and especially the ABE technologies. In this work, a selective pressure against nonedited cells was implemented to increase the base editing efficiency. First, we fused nCas9 or dCas9 with TadA to compare the editing efficiency of nCas9-TadA and dCas9-TadA fusion complexes in the model prokaryote . While nCas9-TadA was able to achieve A to G base editing (ABE) with a moderate efficiency, dCas9-TadA had a very low efficiency. To enrich for edited cells and increase the base-editing efficiency, we utilized the induction of double-strand breaks by active Cas9, which leads to the death of prokaryotic cells. By introducing an inducible active Cas9 with the same editing gRNA as the nCas9-TadA in the base editing process, the cells with nonedited target bases remained vulnerable to Cas9 and were eliminated. Thus, a double-check base editing (DBE) method was established, which significantly improved the editing efficiency of ABE in , reaching 99.0% for some sites. By placing a selective pressure against nonedited cells, the DBE strategy might also be applied to various scenarios to increase the efficiency of many different base editing targets or even for epigenetic DNA modification techniques.
随着CRISPR/Cas9技术的发展,新一代能够转换特定碱基的编辑方法实现了精确的单碱基突变。迄今为止,分别使用胞苷脱氨酶和腺苷脱氨酶(TadA)实现了胞嘧啶向胸腺嘧啶以及腺嘌呤向鸟嘌呤的转换。然而,在某些细胞类型或特定靶位点,碱基编辑效率可能低到无法接受。一个原因可能是缺乏针对未编辑细胞存活的选择压力。关于原核生物中腺嘌呤碱基编辑器(ABE)的研究报道很少,可能是由于TadA的编辑效率相对较低。提高编辑效率是建立碱基编辑技术尤其是ABE技术的关键。在这项工作中,通过对未编辑细胞施加选择压力来提高碱基编辑效率。首先,我们将nCas9或dCas9与TadA融合,以比较nCas9-TadA和dCas9-TadA融合复合物在模式原核生物中的编辑效率。虽然nCas9-TadA能够以中等效率实现A到G的碱基编辑(ABE),但dCas9-TadA的效率非常低。为了富集编辑后的细胞并提高碱基编辑效率,我们利用活性Cas9诱导双链断裂,这会导致原核细胞死亡。通过在碱基编辑过程中引入与nCas9-TadA具有相同编辑gRNA的可诱导活性Cas9,具有未编辑靶碱基的细胞仍然易受Cas9影响并被消除。因此,建立了一种双重检查碱基编辑(DBE)方法,该方法显著提高了ABE在[具体物种]中的编辑效率,某些位点达到了99.0%。通过对未编辑细胞施加选择压力,DBE策略也可能应用于各种情况,以提高许多不同碱基编辑靶点的效率,甚至用于表观遗传DNA修饰技术。