Suppr超能文献

口服对乙酰氨基酚与口服布洛芬治疗动脉导管未闭的随机、对照、非劣效性试验。

Oral Paracetamol vs Oral Ibuprofen in Patent Ductus Arteriosus: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial.

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; Department of Pediatrics, Research and Referral, Army Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Department of Neonatology, Fernandez Hospital, Bogulakunta, Hyderabad, India.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2020 Jul;222:79-84.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.01.058. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that oral paracetamol is non-inferior to oral ibuprofen in closing hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) with an a priori noninferiority (NI) margin of 15%.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized, controlled, NI trial conducted in level III neonatal intensive care units. Consecutively inborn preterm neonates of <32 weeks of gestation with hsPDA were included. Those with structural heart disease, major malformations, and contraindications for enteral feeding or for administration of study drugs were excluded. Interventions included oral paracetamol in the experimental arm and oral ibuprofen in the active control arm. The primary outcome was closure of hsPDA by 24 hours from the last dose of the study drug. Secondary outcome measures included closure of hsPDA by 24 hours after the first course of the study drug, rate of reopening after the first course, and adverse events associated with the study drug.

RESULTS

Out of 1250 neonates screened, 161 were randomized. Oral paracetamol was noninferior to oral ibuprofen in closure of hsPDA by both per protocol analysis (62 [95.4%] vs 63 [94%]; relative risk [RR], 1.01 [95% CI, 0.94-1.1]; risk difference [RD], 1.4 [95% CI, -6 to 9]; P = .37) and intention-to-treat analysis (63 [89%] vs 65 [89%]; RR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.89-1.12]; RD, -0.3 [95% CI, -11 to 10]; P = .47). All adverse events were comparable in the 2 study arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral paracetamol is noninferior to oral ibuprofen for the closure of hsPDA in preterm neonates of <32 weeks of gestation. No difference was observed in the adverse events studied.

摘要

目的

检验假设,即口服扑热息痛在闭合血流动力学显著动脉导管未闭(hsPDA)方面不亚于口服布洛芬,预设非劣效性(NI)边界为 15%。

研究设计

在三级新生儿重症监护病房进行的多中心、随机、对照、NI 试验。纳入连续出生的胎龄<32 周、hsPDA 的早产儿。排除患有结构性心脏病、重大畸形以及存在肠内喂养禁忌或研究药物给药禁忌的患儿。干预措施包括实验组口服扑热息痛,活性对照组口服布洛芬。主要结局是自研究药物最后一次给药后 24 小时内 hsPDA 闭合。次要结局指标包括首次研究药物疗程后 24 小时内 hsPDA 闭合、首次疗程后再开放率以及与研究药物相关的不良事件。

结果

在筛选的 1250 名新生儿中,161 名被随机分组。根据方案分析,口服扑热息痛在 hsPDA 闭合方面不亚于口服布洛芬(62[95.4%]比 63[94%];相对风险[RR],1.01[95%CI,0.94-1.1];差值[RD],1.4[95%CI,-6 至 9];P=0.37)和意向治疗分析(63[89%]比 65[89%];RR,0.99[95%CI,0.89-1.12];RD,-0.3[95%CI,-11 至 10];P=0.47)。2 个研究组的所有不良事件均相似。

结论

在胎龄<32 周的早产儿中,口服扑热息痛在闭合 hsPDA 方面不亚于口服布洛芬。在研究的不良事件方面未观察到差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验