• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of Formal Care Use on Informal Care from Children after the Launch of Long-Term Care Insurance in Shanghai, China.长期护理保险在中国上海推出后对子女提供非正式护理的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 24;17(8):2938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082938.
2
Well-being losses by providing informal care to elderly people: Evidence from 310 caregivers in Shanghai, China.为老年人提供非正规护理的福利损失:来自中国上海 310 名护理者的证据。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 May;29(3):694-702. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13330. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
3
Long-term care insurance and the well-being of older adults and their families: Evidence from China.长期护理保险与老年人及其家庭的福祉:来自中国的证据
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114745. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114745. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
4
Typologies of dependency, household characteristics, and disparity in formal and informal care use: analysis of community-dwelling long-term care insurance claimants in an urban municipality of China.依赖类型、家庭特征与正规和非正规照料使用的差距:对中国一城市社区长期护理保险参保者的分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Nov 10;22(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02048-5.
5
Effect of reduced formal care availability on formal/informal care patterns and caregiver health: a quasi-experimental study using the Japanese long-term care insurance reform.减少正规照料服务供给对正规/非正规照料模式和照料者健康的影响:利用日本长期护理保险改革进行的准实验研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jun 12;20(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01588-7.
6
Individual determinants of task division in older adults' mixed care networks.老年人混合照护网络中任务分工的个体决定因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Jan;22(1):57-66. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12061. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
7
Socioeconomic inequalities in activities of daily living limitations and in the provision of informal and formal care for noninstitutionalized older Brazilians: National Health Survey, 2013.2013年巴西全国健康调查:非机构化老年人日常生活活动受限情况以及非正式和正式照料提供方面的社会经济不平等
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov 17;15(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0429-2.
8
Choice of formal and informal care among community-dwelling older people with or without dementia under a long-term care insurance pilot program in China.在我国长期护理保险试点项目下,有或没有痴呆症的社区居住老年人对正式和非正式护理的选择。
Australas J Ageing. 2024 Jun;43(2):248-255. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13277. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
9
Willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept of informal caregivers of dependent elderly people in Shanghai, China.中国上海失能老人非正式照护者的支付意愿和接受意愿。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05481-2.
10
Examining the Impact of Long-Term Care Insurance on the Care Burden and Labor Market Participation of Informal Carers: A Quasi-Experimental Study in China.考察长期护理保险对非正规护理者的护理负担和劳动力市场参与的影响:中国的准实验研究。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 May 1;79(5). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae023.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Long-Term Care Insurance on health out-of-pocket expenditure ratios for older adults.长期护理保险对老年人医疗自付费用比例的影响。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 15;13:1616761. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1616761. eCollection 2025.
2
The system effect and group benefit equity of long-term care insurance from the perspective of short-term policy pilot.短期政策试点视角下长期护理保险的制度效应与群体受益公平性
Front Public Health. 2025 May 30;13:1580349. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1580349. eCollection 2025.
3
Can Informal Care Be a Substitute for Formal Care? Evidence from Older People with Disabilities in Beijing, China.非正式照料能否替代正式照料?来自中国北京残疾老年人的证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;12(24):2508. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12242508.
4
Can long-term care insurance prevent worsening of frailty among older Chinese adults? A difference-in-differences study based on CHARLS data.长期护理保险能否预防中国老年人身体衰弱状况的恶化?一项基于中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)数据的双重差分研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 12;10(18):e37074. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37074. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
5
Recent innovations in long-term care coverage and financing: a rapid scoping review.长期护理覆盖范围和融资的最新创新:快速范围界定审查。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 22;14(2):e077309. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077309.
6
Different impact on health outcomes of long-term care insurance between urban and rural older residents in China.中国城乡老年居民长期护理保险对健康结果的影响不同。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 5;13(1):253. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27576-6.
7
The Impact of Long-Term Care Insurance on Medical Utilization and Expenditures: Evidence from Jingmen, China.长期护理保险对医疗利用和支出的影响:来自中国荆门的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;19(19):12275. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912275.
8
The impact of long-term care insurance in China on beneficiaries and caregivers: A systematic review.中国长期护理保险对受益人和照护者的影响:一项系统评价
J Glob Health Econ Policy. 2021;1. doi: 10.52872/001c.29559. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
9
Evaluating the long-term care insurance policy from medical expenses and health security equity perspective: evidence from China.从医疗费用和健康保障公平性角度评估长期护理保险政策:来自中国的证据
Arch Public Health. 2022 Jan 4;80(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00761-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptions of health and well-being among older adult caregivers: Comparisons of current caregivers with former and never caregivers.老年照顾者的健康和幸福感认知:当前照顾者与曾经和从未照顾者的比较。
Geriatr Nurs. 2020 Jul-Aug;41(4):429-435. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
2
Development of a self-management support program for caregivers of relatives with dementia in Shanghai.开发针对上海痴呆症患者亲属照顾者的自我管理支持计划。
Geriatr Nurs. 2020 Mar-Apr;41(2):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
3
Disability in the Individual ADL, IADL, and Mobility among Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.老年人个体日常生活活动能力、工具性日常生活活动能力及移动能力方面的残疾:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(8):897-903. doi: 10.1007/s12603-017-0891-6.
4
Time-bound opportunity costs of informal care: consequences for access to professional care, caregiver support, and labour supply estimates.有时间限制的非正式护理机会成本:对获得专业护理、护理人员支持和劳动力供应估计的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Nov;73(10):1508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.027. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
5
Informal and formal care among single-living elderly in Europe.欧洲独居老年人的非正式和正式照料情况。
Health Econ. 2008 Mar;17(3):393-409. doi: 10.1002/hec.1275.
6
The chicken or the egg? Endogeneity in labour market participation of informal carers in England.鸡生蛋还是蛋生鸡?英国非正式护理人员劳动力市场参与中的内生性问题。
J Health Econ. 2007 May 1;26(3):536-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
7
Spatial analysis of elderly access to primary care services.老年人获得初级保健服务的空间分析。
Int J Health Geogr. 2006 May 15;5:19. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-5-19.
8
Household responses to public home care programs.家庭对公共居家护理项目的反应。
J Health Econ. 2006 Jul;25(4):674-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.03.009. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
9
Informal care and health care use of older adults.老年人的非正式照料与医疗保健利用情况
J Health Econ. 2004 Nov;23(6):1159-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.04.008.
10
STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION.老年人疾病研究。日常生活活动能力指数:生物和心理社会功能的标准化测量方法。
JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016.

长期护理保险在中国上海推出后对子女提供非正式护理的影响。

Impact of Formal Care Use on Informal Care from Children after the Launch of Long-Term Care Insurance in Shanghai, China.

机构信息

School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.

School of Political Science and Public Administration, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 24;17(8):2938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082938.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17082938
PMID:32344522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7216006/
Abstract

The impact of formal care (co-paid by long term care (LTC) insurance) on informal care is critical to the improvement and promotion of public policy. We conducted an interview-based survey to examine how the use of formal care impacts the use of informal care in Shanghai, which was one of China's first long-term insurance pilots in 2016. In addition to total informal care time, the following four types of informal care were considered: (1) household activities of daily living (HDL) tasks, (2) activities of daily living (ADL) tasks, (3) instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) tasks, and (4) supervision tasks. Of the 407 families, an average of 12.36 h (SD = 6.70) of informal care was crowded out each week. Among them, ADL tasks, HDL tasks, and supervision tasks were reduced an average of 4.60 (SD = 3.59), 5.50 (SD = 3.38), and 2.10 h (SD = 3.06) per week, respectively. Each additional hour of formal care reduced 0.473 h of informal care. Care recipients' gender and health status were also determined to be associated with crowding out hours of informal care. These findings can be utilized as empirical evidence for decision-makers to consider the scope of funding for formal care, and this study provides comparable results to developing countries and regions.

摘要

正式护理(由长期护理保险共同支付)对非正式护理的影响对改善和促进公共政策至关重要。我们进行了一项基于访谈的调查,以研究上海使用正式护理对非正式护理使用的影响,上海是中国 2016 年首批长期保险试点城市之一。除了总非正式护理时间外,还考虑了以下四种类型的非正式护理:(1)日常生活活动(ADL)的家务活动,(2)ADL 任务,(3)工具性日常生活活动(IADL)任务,和(4)监督任务。在 407 个家庭中,平均每周有 12.36 小时(SD = 6.70)的非正式护理被挤出。其中,ADL 任务、HDL 任务和监督任务每周分别减少 4.60(SD = 3.59)、5.50(SD = 3.38)和 2.10 小时(SD = 3.06)。每增加 1 小时的正式护理,就会减少 0.473 小时的非正式护理。护理接受者的性别和健康状况也被确定与挤出的非正式护理时间有关。这些发现可以作为决策者考虑正式护理资金范围的经验证据,本研究为发展中国家和地区提供了可比的结果。