• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

LI-RADS 2018 初始治疗反应在预测 TACE 后肝细胞癌患者生存中的表现:一项回顾性、单中心队列研究。

Performance of initial LI-RADS 2018 treatment response in predicting survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following TACE: a retrospective, single-center cohort study.

机构信息

Doctoral School, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec;147(12):3673-3683. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03603-9. Epub 2021 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00432-021-03603-9
PMID:33778924
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8557150/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Treatment response following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is frequently evaluated with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Treatment Response (LR-TR) algorithm, but its association with patients' outcomes is not supported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to provide such data.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 99 TACE patients with stage A/B hepatocellular carcinoma according to Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer staging system was performed. Two radiologists assessed LR-TR, while a third radiologist re-assessed divergent results. Overall survival (OS) and time to disease progression (TTP) were the primary endpoints of the study, while the Cox proportional hazard model was used for outcome analyses.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement was substantial between the two readers with κ = 0.69 (95% CI 0.58-0.81). The median OS in viable, equivocal, and non-viable groups were 27, 27, and 73 months, respectively (p < 0.001). However, after adjustment for confounding factors, there was no significant association between initial viable response and OS (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.37-2.63], p = 0.97), while equivocal response remained statistically significant (HR 3.52. [95% CI 1.27-9.71], p = 0.015). No significant association was noted when viable and equivocal groups were analyzed in aggregate (HR 1.03 [95% CI 0.4-2.4], p = 0.96). The median TTP did not differ between non-viable and viable groups (23 vs 18 months, respectively; p = 0.98). None of the analyzed predictors was associated with TTP.

CONCLUSION

Initial LR-TR response was not an independent predictor for OS nor TTP. The preliminary results suggest the necessity for more aggressive management of equivocal patients.

摘要

目的

经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)后的治疗反应通常通过肝脏成像报告和数据系统治疗反应(LR-TR)算法进行评估,但该算法与患者预后的关系在文献中并未得到证实。本研究旨在提供相关数据。

方法

对 99 例巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期系统分期为 A/B 期的肝细胞癌患者进行回顾性分析。两名放射科医生评估 LR-TR,第三位放射科医生对分歧结果进行重新评估。总生存期(OS)和疾病进展时间(TTP)是本研究的主要终点,采用 Cox 比例风险模型进行结果分析。

结果

两位读者之间的观察者间一致性较高,κ 值为 0.69(95%可信区间 0.58-0.81)。在有活力、不确定和无活力组中,中位 OS 分别为 27、27 和 73 个月,差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。然而,在校正混杂因素后,初始有活力反应与 OS 之间无显著关联(HR 0.98 [95%可信区间 0.37-2.63],p=0.97),而不确定反应仍具有统计学意义(HR 3.52 [95%可信区间 1.27-9.71],p=0.015)。当将有活力和不确定组进行汇总分析时,未观察到显著关联(HR 1.03 [95%可信区间 0.4-2.4],p=0.96)。无活力和有活力组之间的中位 TTP 无差异(分别为 23 个月和 18 个月,p=0.98)。分析的预测因子均与 TTP 无关。

结论

初始 LR-TR 反应不是 OS 或 TTP 的独立预测因子。初步结果表明,需要对不确定患者进行更积极的治疗管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6352/11802098/2bb68edde623/432_2021_3603_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6352/11802098/194a53a7bab1/432_2021_3603_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6352/11802098/be9adbd145a3/432_2021_3603_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6352/11802098/2bb68edde623/432_2021_3603_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6352/11802098/194a53a7bab1/432_2021_3603_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6352/11802098/be9adbd145a3/432_2021_3603_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6352/11802098/2bb68edde623/432_2021_3603_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of initial LI-RADS 2018 treatment response in predicting survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following TACE: a retrospective, single-center cohort study.LI-RADS 2018 初始治疗反应在预测 TACE 后肝细胞癌患者生存中的表现:一项回顾性、单中心队列研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec;147(12):3673-3683. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03603-9. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
2
LI-RADS version 2018 treatment response algorithm on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and the added value of ancillary features.LI-RADS 版本 2018 经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌患者的细胞外对比增强 MRI 治疗反应算法:诊断性能和辅助特征的附加价值。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Sep;49(9):3045-3055. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04275-y. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
3
Reproducibility of LI-RADS treatment response algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional therapy.LI-RADS 治疗反应算法在局部区域治疗后对肝细胞癌的可重复性。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Sep;101(9):547-553. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
LI-RADS treatment response algorithm after first-line DEB-TACE: reproducibility and prognostic value at initial post-treatment CT/MRI.DEB-TACE 一线治疗后 LI-RADS 治疗反应算法:初始治疗后 CT/MRI 时的可重复性和预后价值。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Aug;46(8):3708-3716. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03043-6. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
5
Incorporation of Ancillary MRI Features Into the LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Impact on Diagnostic Performance After Locoregional Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.将辅助 MRI 特征纳入 LI-RADS 治疗反应算法:对肝细胞癌局部治疗后诊断性能的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Mar;218(3):484-493. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26677. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
6
Inter-observer agreement using the LI-RADS version 2018 CT treatment response algorithm in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with conventional transarterial chemoembolization.使用 LI-RADS 版本 2018 CT 治疗反应算法评估常规经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌患者的观察者间一致性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Jan;47(1):115-122. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03272-9. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
7
Post-treatment CT LI-RADS categories: predictors of overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma post bland transarterial embolization.治疗后 CT LI-RADS 分类:肝动脉栓塞后肝细胞癌总体生存的预测因素。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Aug;46(8):3738-3747. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02775-1. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
8
Sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization versus transarterial chemoembolization alone for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching study.索拉非尼联合经动脉化疗栓塞术与单纯经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗晚期肝细胞癌的倾向评分匹配研究
PLoS One. 2014 May 9;9(5):e96620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096620. eCollection 2014.
9
Added Value of CT Arterial Subtraction Images in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Treatment Response Categorization for Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.CT 动脉减影图像在经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的肝脏影像报告和数据系统治疗反应分类中的附加价值。
Invest Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;56(2):109-116. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000714.
10
The safety and efficacy of balloon-occluded transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.球囊阻塞经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗常规经导管动脉化疗栓塞术抵抗的肝细胞癌的安全性和有效性。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Oct;30(10):5650-5662. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06911-9. Epub 2020 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between Time to Local Tumor Control and Treatment Outcomes Following Repeated Loco-Regional Treatment Session in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study.肝细胞癌患者重复局部区域治疗疗程后局部肿瘤控制时间与治疗结果的关联:一项回顾性单中心研究
Life (Basel). 2021 Oct 9;11(10):1062. doi: 10.3390/life11101062.
2
Inter-observer agreement using the LI-RADS version 2018 CT treatment response algorithm in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with conventional transarterial chemoembolization.使用 LI-RADS 版本 2018 CT 治疗反应算法评估常规经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌患者的观察者间一致性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Jan;47(1):115-122. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03272-9. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Hepatocellular carcinoma Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems treatment response assessment: Lessons learned and future directions.肝细胞癌肝脏影像报告和数据系统治疗反应评估:经验教训与未来方向。
World J Hepatol. 2020 Oct 27;12(10):738-753. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i10.738.
2
LI-RADS 4 or 5 categorization may not be clinically relevant for decision-making processes: A prospective cohort study.LI-RADS 4 或 5 分类对于决策过程可能没有临床意义:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Hepatol. 2020 Nov-Dec;19(6):662-667. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Performance of LI-RADS version 2018 CT treatment response algorithm in tumor response evaluation and survival prediction of patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation.
2018版LI-RADS CT治疗反应算法在单发性肝细胞癌患者射频消融术后肿瘤反应评估及生存预测中的性能
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):388. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.120.
4
Reproducibility of LI-RADS treatment response algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional therapy.LI-RADS 治疗反应算法在局部区域治疗后对肝细胞癌的可重复性。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Sep;101(9):547-553. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
5
Hepatocellular Carcinoma-How to Determine Therapeutic Options.肝细胞癌——如何确定治疗方案
Hepatol Commun. 2020 Jan 22;4(3):342-354. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1481. eCollection 2020 Mar.
6
LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features.钆塞酸增强 MRI 的 LI-RADS 治疗反应分类:与 mRECIST 的诊断性能比较及辅助特征的附加价值。
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2861-2870. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06623-9. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
7
Assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response with LI-RADS: a pictorial review.使用肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)评估肝细胞癌的治疗反应:图文综述
Insights Imaging. 2019 Dec 18;10(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0801-z.
8
LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm: The Evidence Is Accumulating.肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)2018版治疗反应算法:证据正在积累。
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):327-328. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192484. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
9
The LI-RADS Version 2018 MRI Treatment Response Algorithm: Evaluation of Ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.LI-RADS 版本 2018 MRI 治疗反应算法:消融治疗肝细胞癌的评估。
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):320-326. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191581. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
10
Lipiodol retention pattern after TACE for HCC is a predictor for local progression in lesions with complete response.经 TACE 治疗 HCC 后,碘油潴留模式是完全缓解病灶局部进展的预测因子。
Cancer Imaging. 2019 Nov 15;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0260-2.