Doctoral School, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec;147(12):3673-3683. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03603-9. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
Treatment response following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is frequently evaluated with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Treatment Response (LR-TR) algorithm, but its association with patients' outcomes is not supported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to provide such data.
A retrospective analysis of 99 TACE patients with stage A/B hepatocellular carcinoma according to Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer staging system was performed. Two radiologists assessed LR-TR, while a third radiologist re-assessed divergent results. Overall survival (OS) and time to disease progression (TTP) were the primary endpoints of the study, while the Cox proportional hazard model was used for outcome analyses.
Interobserver agreement was substantial between the two readers with κ = 0.69 (95% CI 0.58-0.81). The median OS in viable, equivocal, and non-viable groups were 27, 27, and 73 months, respectively (p < 0.001). However, after adjustment for confounding factors, there was no significant association between initial viable response and OS (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.37-2.63], p = 0.97), while equivocal response remained statistically significant (HR 3.52. [95% CI 1.27-9.71], p = 0.015). No significant association was noted when viable and equivocal groups were analyzed in aggregate (HR 1.03 [95% CI 0.4-2.4], p = 0.96). The median TTP did not differ between non-viable and viable groups (23 vs 18 months, respectively; p = 0.98). None of the analyzed predictors was associated with TTP.
Initial LR-TR response was not an independent predictor for OS nor TTP. The preliminary results suggest the necessity for more aggressive management of equivocal patients.
经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)后的治疗反应通常通过肝脏成像报告和数据系统治疗反应(LR-TR)算法进行评估,但该算法与患者预后的关系在文献中并未得到证实。本研究旨在提供相关数据。
对 99 例巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期系统分期为 A/B 期的肝细胞癌患者进行回顾性分析。两名放射科医生评估 LR-TR,第三位放射科医生对分歧结果进行重新评估。总生存期(OS)和疾病进展时间(TTP)是本研究的主要终点,采用 Cox 比例风险模型进行结果分析。
两位读者之间的观察者间一致性较高,κ 值为 0.69(95%可信区间 0.58-0.81)。在有活力、不确定和无活力组中,中位 OS 分别为 27、27 和 73 个月,差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。然而,在校正混杂因素后,初始有活力反应与 OS 之间无显著关联(HR 0.98 [95%可信区间 0.37-2.63],p=0.97),而不确定反应仍具有统计学意义(HR 3.52 [95%可信区间 1.27-9.71],p=0.015)。当将有活力和不确定组进行汇总分析时,未观察到显著关联(HR 1.03 [95%可信区间 0.4-2.4],p=0.96)。无活力和有活力组之间的中位 TTP 无差异(分别为 23 个月和 18 个月,p=0.98)。分析的预测因子均与 TTP 无关。
初始 LR-TR 反应不是 OS 或 TTP 的独立预测因子。初步结果表明,需要对不确定患者进行更积极的治疗管理。