Möllmann Charlotte J, Kielland-Kaisen Ulrikke, Paul Bettina, Schulze Sally, Jennewein Lukas, Louwen Frank, Brüggmann Dörthe
FRABAT Frankfurt Breech at Term Study Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
FRABAT Frankfurt Breech at Term Study Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:588-593. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.053. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
3-4% of pregnant women present with a fetal breech position at term. National societies regard vaginal breech delivery as a safe option, but only for a specific and thoroughly counseled group of patients. To avoid adverse outcome, many practitioners recommend elective cesarean section once their patients go past the estimated due date. Since encompassing evidence is missing, the evaluation on this common clinical practice is needed.
This study compares the short-term maternal and fetal outcome in intended vaginally breech deliveries before the estimated due date (until 40 0/7 weeks of gestation) to the outcome of deliveries carried out past the estimated due date (later than 40 0/7 weeks of gestation).
This prospective cohort study includes 827 women who presented for an intended vaginal breech delivery of a singleton at our perinatal center between January 2010 and December 2016.
447 patients (54%) delivered before or at their estimated due date, 380 (46%) of pregnancies continued after the estimated due date. Comparing both groups, no significant difference in maternal and neonatal short-term mortality and morbidity was found. The rate of caesarian sections was increased in the group of patients, who delivered later than 40 1/7 weeks of gestation. Here, the likelihood for delivery maneuvers was also increased.
This study provides evidence, that an elective cesarean section for breech presentations at term is not obligatory when the estimated due date has passed in singleton pregnancy.
3%至4%的孕妇在足月时出现胎儿臀位。各国学会认为阴道臀位分娩是一种安全的选择,但仅适用于经过特定且充分咨询的特定患者群体。为避免不良后果,许多从业者建议一旦患者超过预产期,就进行选择性剖宫产。由于缺乏全面的证据,需要对这种常见的临床做法进行评估。
本研究比较了预计预产期前(直至妊娠40 0/7周)计划经阴道臀位分娩的母婴短期结局与超过预计预产期(超过妊娠40 0/7周)分娩的结局。
这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了2010年1月至2016年12月期间在我们围产期中心计划经阴道单胎臀位分娩的827名女性。
447名患者(54%)在预计预产期或之前分娩,380名(46%)妊娠在预计预产期后继续。比较两组,母婴短期死亡率和发病率无显著差异。妊娠超过40 1/7周分娩的患者组剖宫产率增加。在此组中,助产操作的可能性也增加。
本研究提供了证据,即单胎妊娠超过预计预产期时,足月臀位选择性剖宫产并非必要。