Giardina Traber D, Royse Kathryn E, Khanna Arushi, Haskell Helen, Hallisy Julia, Southwick Frederick, Singh Hardeep
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 May;46(5):282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
Patients can provide valuable information missing from traditional sources of safety data, thus adding new insights about factors that lead to preventable harm. In this study, researchers determined associations between patient-reported contributory factors and patient-reported harms experienced after an adverse event (AE).
A secondary analysis was conducted of a national sample of patient-reported AEs (surgical, medication, diagnostic, and hospital-acquired infection) gathered through an online questionnaire between January 2010 and February 2016. Generalized logit multivariable regression was used to assess the association between patient-reported contributory factors and patient-reported harms (grouped as nonphysical harm only, physical harm only, physical harm and emotional or financial harm, and all three harms) and adjusted for patient and AE characteristics.
One third of patients (32.6%) reported experiencing all three harms, 27.3% reported physical harms and one additional harm, 25.5% reported physical harms only, and 14.7% reported nonphysical harms only. Patients reporting all three harms were 2.5 times more likely to have filed a report with a responsible authority (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-5.01) and 3.3 times more likely to have also experienced a surgical complication (95% CI = 1.42-7.51). Odds of reporting problems related to communication between clinician and patients/families or clinician-related behavioral issues was 13% higher in those experiencing all three harm types (95% CI = 1.07-1.19).
Patients' experiences are important to identify safety issues and reduce harm and should be included in patient safety measurement and improvement activities. These findings underscore the need for policy and practice changes to identify, address, and support harmed patients.
患者能够提供传统安全数据来源中缺失的有价值信息,从而为导致可预防伤害的因素增添新的见解。在本研究中,研究人员确定了患者报告的促成因素与不良事件(AE)后患者报告的伤害之间的关联。
对2010年1月至2016年2月期间通过在线问卷收集的全国患者报告的不良事件(手术、用药、诊断和医院获得性感染)样本进行二次分析。使用广义对数多变量回归来评估患者报告的促成因素与患者报告的伤害(分为仅非身体伤害、仅身体伤害、身体伤害以及情感或经济伤害,以及所有三种伤害)之间的关联,并针对患者和不良事件特征进行调整。
三分之一的患者(32.6%)报告经历了所有三种伤害,27.3%报告了身体伤害和另外一种伤害,25.5%仅报告了身体伤害,14.7%仅报告了非身体伤害。报告所有三种伤害的患者向责任机构提交报告的可能性高2.5倍(95%置信区间[CI]=1.23 - 5.01),同时经历手术并发症的可能性高3.3倍(95%CI = 1.42 - 7.51)。在经历所有三种伤害类型的患者中,报告与临床医生和患者/家属之间沟通问题或临床医生相关行为问题的几率高13%(95%CI = 1.07 - 1.19)。
患者的经历对于识别安全问题和减少伤害很重要,应纳入患者安全测量和改进活动中。这些发现强调了政策和实践变革以识别、解决和支持受伤害患者的必要性。