• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个由多方利益相关者共识驱动的研究议程,旨在更好地理解和支持有害事件对患者及其家庭的情感影响。

A Multi-Stakeholder Consensus-Driven Research Agenda for Better Understanding and Supporting the Emotional Impact of Harmful Events on Patients and Families.

作者信息

Bell Sigall K, Etchegaray Jason M, Gaufberg Elizabeth, Lowe Elizabeth, Ottosen Madelene J, Sands Kenneth E, Lee Barbara Sarnoff, Thomas Eric J, Van Niel Melinda, Kenney Linda

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Jul;44(7):424-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.03.007
PMID:30008355
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The nature and consequences of patient and family emotional harm stemming from preventable medical error, such as losing a loved one or surviving serious medical injury, is poorly understood. Patients and families, clinicians, social scientists, lawyers, and foundation/policy leaders were brought together to establish research priorities for this issue.

METHODS

A one-day conference of diverse stakeholder groups to establish a consensus-driven research agenda focused on (1) priorities for research on the short-term and long-term emotional impact of harmful events on patients and families, (2) barriers and enablers to conducting such research, and (3) actionable steps toward better supporting harmed patients and families now.

RESULTS

Stakeholders discussed patient and family experiences after serious harmful events, including profound isolation, psychological distress, damaging aspects of medical culture, health care aversion, and negative effects on communities. Stakeholder groups reached consensus, defining four research priorities: (1) Establish conceptual framework and patient-centered taxonomy of harm and healing; (2) Describe epidemiology of emotional harm; (3) Determine how to make emotional harm and long-term impacts visible to health care organizations and society at large; and (4) Develop and implement best practices for emotional support of patients and families. The group also created a strategy for overcoming research barriers and actionable "Do Now" approaches to improve the patient and family experience while research is ongoing.

CONCLUSION

Emotional and other long-term impacts of harmful events can have profound consequences for patients and families. Stakeholders designed a path forward to inform approaches that better support harmed patients and families, with both immediately actionable and longer-term research strategies.

摘要

背景

可预防的医疗差错给患者及其家属带来的情感伤害的性质和后果,如失去亲人或在严重医疗伤害中幸存,目前还知之甚少。患者及其家属、临床医生、社会科学家、律师以及基金会/政策领导人齐聚一堂,为该问题确定研究重点。

方法

召开了为期一天的会议,参会人员来自不同利益相关者群体,目的是建立一个以共识为驱动的研究议程,重点关注:(1)有害事件对患者及其家属短期和长期情感影响的研究重点;(2)开展此类研究的障碍和促进因素;(3)目前更好地支持受伤害患者及其家属的可采取行动的步骤。

结果

利益相关者讨论了严重有害事件后患者及其家属的经历,包括深刻的孤立感、心理困扰、医疗文化的有害方面、对医疗保健的反感以及对社区的负面影响。利益相关者群体达成了共识,确定了四个研究重点:(1)建立伤害与康复的概念框架和以患者为中心的分类法;(2)描述情感伤害的流行病学;(3)确定如何让医疗保健机构和整个社会了解情感伤害及其长期影响;(4)制定并实施对患者及其家属进行情感支持的最佳实践。该小组还制定了克服研究障碍的策略以及在研究进行期间改善患者及其家属体验的可立即采取行动的“现在就做”方法。

结论

有害事件的情感及其他长期影响可能会给患者及其家属带来深远后果。利益相关者设计了一条前进道路,为更好地支持受伤害患者及其家属的方法提供信息,既有可立即采取行动的策略,也有长期研究策略。

相似文献

1
A Multi-Stakeholder Consensus-Driven Research Agenda for Better Understanding and Supporting the Emotional Impact of Harmful Events on Patients and Families.一个由多方利益相关者共识驱动的研究议程,旨在更好地理解和支持有害事件对患者及其家庭的情感影响。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Jul;44(7):424-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 May 30.
2
Emotional Harm Following Incidents in Health Care: What Can Researchers Do?医疗保健事件后的情感伤害:研究人员能做什么?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Jul;44(7):421-423. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
Third Things as Inspiration and Artifact: A Multi-Stakeholder Qualitative Approach to Understand Patient and Family Emotions after Harmful Events.作为灵感与产物的第三事物:一种多利益相关者定性研究方法,用于理解有害事件后患者及家属的情绪
J Med Humanit. 2019 Dec;40(4):489-504. doi: 10.1007/s10912-019-09563-z.
4
Prioritizing Possibilities for Child and Family Health: An Agenda to Address Adverse Childhood Experiences and Foster the Social and Emotional Roots of Well-being in Pediatrics.优先考虑儿童和家庭健康的可能性:解决不良儿童经历问题并促进儿科学中幸福感的社会和情感根源的议程。
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7S):S36-S50. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.06.002.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
7
Making inpatient medication reconciliation patient centered, clinically relevant and implementable: a consensus statement on key principles and necessary first steps.使住院患者用药重整以患者为中心、具有临床相关性且切实可行:关于关键原则和必要初步措施的共识声明。
J Hosp Med. 2010 Oct;5(8):477-85. doi: 10.1002/jhm.849.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
Long-Term Impacts Faced by Patients and Families After Harmful Healthcare Events.有害医疗保健事件后患者及其家庭面临的长期影响。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1145-e1151. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000451.
10
Toward patient-centered cancer care: patient perceptions of problematic events, impact, and response.迈向以患者为中心的癌症护理:患者对问题事件的看法、影响和反应。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1784-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.1384. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The TRANS-SAFE Patient Safety Learning Laboratory: A Protocol for Systems Improvement for Psychosocial Safety in Transgender Care.跨性别者安全患者安全学习实验室:跨性别护理中心理社会安全系统改进方案
J Patient Saf. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001383.
2
What do patients and families observe about pediatric safety?: A thematic analysis of real-time narratives.患者及其家属如何观察儿科安全性?:实时叙事的主题分析。
J Hosp Med. 2024 Sep;19(9):765-776. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13388. Epub 2024 May 13.
3
Disclosure following a medical error: lessons learned from a national initiative of workshops with patients, healthcare teams, and executives.
医疗差错后的披露:从一项面向患者、医疗团队和管理人员的全国性研讨会倡议中吸取的经验教训。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Mar 11;13(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00599-8.
4
Developing a Next-of-Kin Involvement Guide in Cancer Care-Results From a Consensus Process.制定癌症护理中亲属参与指南——基于共识过程的结果。
Cancer Nurs. 2021;44(6):E447-E457. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000869.
5
Health Care Provider Factors Associated with Patient-Reported Adverse Events and Harm.与患者报告的不良事件和伤害相关的医疗服务提供者因素。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 May;46(5):282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
6
Third Things as Inspiration and Artifact: A Multi-Stakeholder Qualitative Approach to Understand Patient and Family Emotions after Harmful Events.作为灵感与产物的第三事物:一种多利益相关者定性研究方法,用于理解有害事件后患者及家属的情绪
J Med Humanit. 2019 Dec;40(4):489-504. doi: 10.1007/s10912-019-09563-z.