Parr G D, Poole P H
Ciba-Geigy Pharmaceuticals, Horsham, West Sussex, UK.
J Hum Hypertens. 1988 Oct;2(3):153-6.
Random zero and standard sphygmomanometers were compared in a balanced study performed by 36 members of a General Practitioner Clinical Research Group. In addition the influence of arm position, supported versus dependent, was examined. There was minimal difference between the mean blood pressures measured by the two sphygmomanometers, although the results from the random zero were more variable. The mean blood pressures with the arm supported were consistently lower than with the arm dependent: 127/79 mmHg arm supported vs 131/83 mmHg arm dependent. It is recommended that the position of the arm should be standardised to that of being supported roughly horizontally at heart level. The random zero machine should be used for clinical trial work where the elimination of observer bias is important, and when proper training of observers can be undertaken.
在一项由全科医生临床研究小组的36名成员进行的均衡研究中,对随机零点血压计和标准血压计进行了比较。此外,还研究了手臂位置(支撑与下垂)的影响。两种血压计测得的平均血压之间差异极小,尽管随机零点血压计的结果更具变异性。手臂支撑时的平均血压始终低于手臂下垂时:手臂支撑时为127/79 mmHg,手臂下垂时为131/83 mmHg。建议将手臂位置标准化为大致水平支撑于心脏水平。在消除观察者偏差很重要且能够对观察者进行适当培训的临床试验工作中,应使用随机零点血压计。